AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:09 AM
Original message |
Ben and Jerry's Ice Cream |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 10:10 AM by AllentownJake
Was once owned by Ben and Jerry two former hippies. It used to be an independent Ice Cream maker in Vermont. It was very popular amongst progressives because of the social mission of the company and the values of it's founders
In 2000 it was sold to Unilever a British and Dutch food conglomerate.
The brand still does socially good things, but people are fooling themselves if they think the decisions are being made by Ben and Jerry or that the brand would ever engage in any activism that would be not in the best interest of Unilever.
This is my analogy for the democratic party.
Feel free to discuss.
|
ThatsMyBarack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:10 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I have a B&J shop a few blocks from my house. |
|
After I see a movie across the street, I always pick up a pint of Peanut Butter & Chocolate on the way home! :9
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:10 AM
Response to Original message |
2. except that the birth of the dem party doesn't parallel Ben and Jerry's |
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Modern democratic party was born in 1932 |
|
The Modern GOP has nothing to do with it's founders ideology either, it was founded in 1980.
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:14 AM
Response to Original message |
4. I think I'll mention your total inability to post anything pro-active. |
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message |
5. A better analogy would be the Twilight Zone episode where all |
|
the neighbors fed off each others paranoia to the point where they were convinced a simple power outage was the prelude to an Alien invasion.
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. With Rahm the one in the space ship |
catbyte
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
Just give me a pint of their Chocolate Fudge Brownie! :hide:
Diane
Anishanbe inMI
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
At least they are still making good Ice Cream.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. You can put anyone you want in your imagined space ship |
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. In that epsiode there was an actual spaceship |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 10:24 AM by AllentownJake
:rofl:
Sitting on a mountain watching the neighborhood playing with the power.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. like I said you are free to believe in little green men if you want |
|
hell even unicorns and pixies are fair game
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. I just PM'd you the synopsis of the episode. |
|
Should have used a different analogy. Back it up on that one.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Remember the ending
The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, prejudices, to be found only in the minds of men. For the record, prejudices can kill, and suspicion can destroy, and the frightened, thoughtless search for a scapegoat has a fallout all of its own: for the children, and the children yet unborn. And the pity of it is that these things cannot be confined to the Twilight Zone.
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. There were aliens playing with the lights |
|
The people just turned on each other in response, right now your government is run by corporate stooges playing with the lights through campaign donations.
You can not serve two masters type of thing. If you have to represent the interest of both your donors and your voters, than you are stuck in a decision when they conflict. Generally speaking, money is always the deciding factor.
:rofl:
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. I would respectfully suggest you do less laughing and more reflection |
|
that description could just as easily apply to the destructive group mentality we are witnessing in the liberal blog sphere.
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
18. That mentality is a battle between two subsets of people |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 11:11 AM by AllentownJake
One that realizes that their government is for sale, and another that is afraid of dominionist boogeyman.
What is the biggest threat is the debate being had right now.
The people playing with the lights, are playing with them in both parties. They don't care who wins, as long as they control them.
|
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
20. That is far more the purview of others rather than jake's. Jake is a realist. |
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. Jake is an idealist, not a pragmatist, which is why we don't see eye to eye |
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. Actually, Jake is very boots on the ground and capable of understanding |
|
the actual nuts and bolts of politics. He understands cause and effect, which is why he is insiteful.And his experience is not limited to campigns, but party politics as well.
|
NJmaverick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
24. Exactly he is the idealist boots on the ground type |
|
I have to work within the government structure so I have the sort of pragamatic attitude most of the people who actually have to produce in the system tend to take.
|
AllentownJake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. I've been in the back room locally |
|
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 12:14 PM by AllentownJake
Can you say this. Trust me, I know more about the realities of what is going on than you do.
|
LastNaturalist
(374 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message |
dave29
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
17. I would stick with dysfunctional family. |
Romulox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
19. Can I add that Ben and Jerry's has been coasting on its past reputation for YEARS now? nt |
kctim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Does that mean 10 out of every 100 B&J eaters get really pissed off when B&J's doesn't make a flavor EXACTLY as that 10 wanted? Do those 10 stomp their feet, hold their breath and swear off B&J's forever? Do those 10 call the B&J eaters who disagree with them 'Blue Bunny Ice Creamers' simply because they know that with current machinary, it is impossible to make it EXACTLY as the 10 want?
If so, then this is a true analogy for the Democratic Party.
|
Echo In Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Same reason we burn Goloka or Red Nag Champa instead of what the stores now carry |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |