Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Incrementalism in a time of rapid change

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:59 AM
Original message
Incrementalism in a time of rapid change
There are many posters out there that HCR is but a first step, that our government is designed to move in increments. In normal times, under normal circumstances, they're right.

But these aren't normal times or normal circumstances. Thousands of people are dying, going broke due to our current health care system, and this so called "reform" isn't going to relieve that, but rather exacerbate the problem in some ways.

Meanwhile we've got a rapidly changing climate, one that is changing much too fast for the slow-ass do nothing pace of Kyoto and Copenhagen, where nothing seeming got done except the US promised to give away money that we don't have and lots of pollution was released so the elite could attend. We also got NAFTA and free trade which is quickly killing the labor force in this country, and many, many other issues.

All of these problems are rapidly developing, moving at a pace far faster than our incrementally inclined Congress can keep up with. It is time for a change.

FDR was faced with this same problem when he came into office, a set of rapidly developing problems and Congress that moved slower than a snail's ass. Yet he managed to light a fire under that Congress, that is why his First Hundred Days is still a notable thing.

Obama needs to start channeling FDR, he needs to start lighting a fire under Congress to get things done. In fact he should have done this months ago. If he had opened up his administration like FDR did, we would have a much better HCR bill, and it would have been signed, sealed and delivered before the August break. Instead he dithered, allowing Congress to drift, and now we're going to pay the price.

He needs to learn from this lesson, and start becoming much more hands on. Otherwise, the change that he promised isn't going to come about. Or maybe that's the way he wants it:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Incrementalism worked extremely well for the Far Right
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 11:09 AM by FreakinDJ
Limpdick used to preach it on a daily basis

Considering 8 years of Bush, 14 years of a RATpubliCON controlled House and Senate, Deregulation of Banking, Demise of American Manufacturing, Off-Shoring of Millions of American jobs - I would say it was the single most effective strategy in progressing Raegenomics / Trickle Down Theory / and the Demise of the American Working Class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. Wasn't Social Security just for widows and orphans when it was first passed?
I think FDR was more incrementalist than you're making him out to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. But taken as a whole body of work,
Social Security, Unemployment Insurance, the various works projects, all of this added up to a very radical change in a very short amount of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Some thought he was maddeningly incremental going into WWll
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. *cough* let's not get into Pearl Harbor NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. understood
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texanwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am tired of waiting for what we should have had years ago.
We have the money, look at all the money we can spent on war.

Money for war, money for some kind of national health care.

Some people don't have time to wait, tell it to their cancer or bad heart.

FDR came into office and started to work, we another FDR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. the Supreme Court believed 'Separate but Equal' was incremental as well...
Edited on Thu Dec-24-09 12:36 AM by JCMach1
When it comes to basic human rights like discrimination and health care, I am not a fan of incremental!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. Obama didn't run on incrementalism. We didn't vote for incrementalism.
If this is what Obama meant by HOPE and CHANGE and YES WE CAN, he can keep it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC