Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On MSNBC: Hamsher told Schuster that she had formed common cause with Grover Norquist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:01 PM
Original message
On MSNBC: Hamsher told Schuster that she had formed common cause with Grover Norquist
and they are joined in moving against Rahm Emanuel on wealth transfers associated with Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.

I just have the most queasy feeling with where this is headed. Having spent years pushing against the likes of Norquist, he is among a particularly odious type of R that I would not wish to find myself recruiting as an ally. People, it doesn't pass the smell test for someone like Norquist to suddenly develop a concern for the common man. I fear that progressives are setting themselves up to be used as tools in the zeal to just be against. I don't necessarily disagree with most of the issues out there, but at a common sense level, this just ain't right.

Sorry, but I'm standing on the platform for a bit, until I'm certain that the right train has pulled in the station.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomCADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. I Don't Believe It. Transcript?
Grover Norquist is a corporate pimp of the highest magnitude. Harper's magazine did a story on him and how he pretty much created astroturf as a money making industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Believe it. I just watched her being interviewed by Schuster along
with some one of those Republican robots they send out every day--don't know his name. I'm sure others have seen it and I don't have the means hear to make a transcrip for you. Was on MSNBC at about 3 pm CST.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I saw it too. Shuster was surprised and asked Jane to explain. She said
Edited on Wed Dec-23-09 04:15 PM by Parker CA
something to the effect that in the current climate Dems and Reps are closer than ever in wanting to fight the corporate HC industry and big phrma. Look for a youtube clip or video on DU later.

Surprising to say the least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. It's true. Hamsher has joined forces with Norquist...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Her sell out is complete, young Skywalker.
Boy, that didn't take long after her appearance on Fox, did it?

I look forward to hearing from Jane's DU apologists. Outside of KKKarl :thumbsdown: Rove & Glenn :crazy: Beck, I can't think of any person more odious to be cuddling up with than Grover Norquist.

Looks like Jane :wtf: Hamsher has aligned herself with the dark side. Maybe she can get busy producing black face pictures of Pelosi, Franken and the other Ds who are supporting the Senate HCR bill. I'm sure Grover would give her a hand with those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeschutesRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Believe it - I just saw it too on MSNBC.
I must have not understood who Jane Hamscher was, because what I just heard didn't resonate with the kind of person I thought she was.

That Grover dude is a hawked up piece of hairball - I am not impressed by anyone who has so little fortitude or conviction that she must partner with a person of this ilk to further her agenda. I am gonna turn the volume down when J. Hamscher comes on the air. She no longer has anything to say that is of interest to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. I saw it it is true
I love Jane but I am a bit wary of this as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. Why don't you believe it? Teabagger Jane isn't shy about it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Jane Hamsher, Grover Norquist Call for Rahm Emanuel’s Resignation
"Before the White House commits any more money to Fannie and Freddie, we call on the Public Integrity Section in the Justice Department to begin an investigation into the cause of Fannie and Freddie’s conservatorship, into Rahm Emanuel’s activities on the board of Freddie Mac (including any violations of his fiduciary duties to shareholders), into the decision-making behind the continued vacancy of Fannie and Freddie’s Inspector General post, and into potential public corruption by Rahm Emanuel in connection with his time in Congress, in the White House, and on the board of Freddie Mac.

We also call for the immediate appointment of an Inspector General with a complete remit to go after this information.

We both come from differing political ideologies. One of us is the conservative head of a transparency foundation, and the other is the publisher of a liberal political blog. But we make common cause today out of grave concern for the future of our country in the wake of corruption-riddled bailouts. These bailouts continue to rob Main Street to benefit Wall Street, and, because of that, we together demand the resignation of Mr. Emanuel, a man who has steadfastly worked to obstruct both oversight and inquiry into the matter. Rahm Emanuel’s conflicts of interest render him far too compromised to serve as gatekeeper to the President of the United States."

http://firedoglake.com/2009/12/23/jane-hamsher-grover-norquist-call-for-rahm-emmanuel%E2%80%99s-resignation/#comments

Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Unless this is what we want to stand with--NO WAY IN HELL


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. See this is where people just stop thinking.
If I found myself suddenly in agreement with some crazy nutjob on the right, you bet I would reexamine my position --I might not change it, but I would damn well consider it.

And yeah, I don't relish being on the same side as Lieberman and/or Nelson, but I'm not on the same side as Norquist, Coburn or DeMint.

The association thing is a point to consider.

And when you actively seek to undermine help for the poor by joining with Grover Norquist, that's damned unforgivable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hamsher is a teabagger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Bullshit.
But she sure doesn't worship at Obama's altar.

So you be sure to destroy her.

I seem to recall plenty of opposition to Rahm's appointment here on DU. Suddenly he's sacred and untouchable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. she's destroying herself and her own credibility by this kind of move.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
37. I admire all that Hamsher has done. And I admire her bringing attention...
to this barf-bag of a health-care bill, but I can't
see WHY IN THE WORLD she felt she needed to join with
GROVER NORQUIST for ANY reason.

He is a complete tool.

She is making a stupid move here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. Strange days. Obama standing with Billy Tauzin. Hamsher standing with Grover Norquist.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Politics make STRANGE bedfellows!
:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Indeed. Other famous examples in history:
Dick Armey and Bob Barr worked as consultants to the ACLU during some of the Bush years

Not as dramatic: Tsongas and Rudman forming the Concord Coalition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Tsongas and Rudman probably one of the BEST!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Agreed. Liked them both nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama critic detected. Must. Destroy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. If anyone's curious, the video link is here and the discussion starts at 4:19
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
13. It's settled then, Hamsher is officially the enemy
every bit as much as Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. She turned me into a newt!
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
14. That's it for me.
I have always liked Hamsher. However, there are a lot of ways to protest the health care bill. Doing ANYTHING with Grover Norquist isn't one of them.

Norquist and his minions are one of the reasons the US is in such bad shape to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Norquist is who organized the meetings where talking points were settled upon & disseminated
for Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. Finally someone on the left has the balls to
step out of their corporate assigned role as official punching bag.
It's going to be hard for our corporate masters to play the left against the right on this one. Not to mention Rahm's guilty as sin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yep this went beyond health care
it seems her goal her is to bring down Rahm. I wish her well on that. I don't know if joining forces with foes like Norquist is wise or could possibly achieve anything. BUT, her gist is ultimately true-Obama/Rahm are selling America to the highest bidder while we stand by and hope for the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
21. Details are at the link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wardoc Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
23. I get that, but honestly I don't mind allying with a slug if it kills this POS bill because...
unlike those that are lapping this garbage up, we are in it for the purpose not because it comes in the prettier packaging. If our best tactic is to ally with whoever in accomplishing the goal, by all means let us do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. Good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. She really likes being the RW's token liberal stooge, doesn't she?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
27. She's an idiot.
Why is she so popular on here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. That's bipartisanship, isn't it?
True, the result is likely to be harmful to the progressive members of the effort, and either neutral or empowering to the right wing side.

What's new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. The status quo, don't make waves progressive effort has failed. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. A "status quo progressive"
is an oxymoron. Could be why the effort has failed :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Exactly.
Defending the status quo and calling backwards legislation progressive is, mildly put, self defeating. Not being able to stand on a single principle because something is better than nothing is cowardly and has failed miserably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. I know who Grover Norquist is(all too well) but who is this Jane Hamster?
Is she someone I should have heard of before? Whats her claim to fame? Actress? Activist? What? Is she related to Orly Tortits?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
39. Let me just pose a question here, leaving out the personalities involved,
What if the allegations are true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC