grahamhgreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:14 PM
Original message |
Is it true that there are no limits on what insurers can charge you if u have a PRE-existing condi- |
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I thought it was only 3 or 4 times what they charge a healthy young person. |
|
Of course, I don't think there's anything to stop them from denying any claims.
|
gravity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. That difference is only based on age |
|
preexisting conditions have no part in it.
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Oh, so they'll still continue with claim denials to pad their balance sheets. nt |
Orangepeel
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:17 PM
Response to Original message |
Schema Thing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:33 PM
Response to Original message |
dgibby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The annual cap is still in the bill.
|
lamp_shade
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-24-09 06:01 AM
Response to Original message |
7. It seems to me they wouldn't even be allowed to ask the question. |
Recursion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-24-09 07:06 AM
Response to Original message |
8. No, they've capped that |
|
Some people here are vexed that they capped it at 3x the actuarial rate for your age, but it's definitely a cap.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:32 AM
Response to Original message |