wndycty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:16 PM
Original message |
Since folks are playing the enemy of my enemy is my friend re: HamsherNordquistEmanuel |
|
I wonder who will they choose Nordquist or Emanuel who helped us grow our majorities. Hmmmmmmmmmmm
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message |
|
A bunch of anti choice gay hating corporatists posing as "Democrats". All hail Rahm the Angry Dwarf. :eyes:
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:20 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Iirc, Emanuel has made a hobby of attacking the man that grew our majority. |
Ken Burch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. Why does Rahm hate his own party so much, anyway? |
|
Does he even REMEMBER that his mother marched for civil rights?
|
Hello_Kitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |
3. So long as Ben Nelson and Bart Stupak are respected elected Democrats. |
|
I don't honestly give a shit who Jane Hamsher hangs out with.
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |
5. None of the above. It was Howard Dean. |
David Zephyr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. It was Howard Dean. An inconvenient truth for some today. |
|
Funny how quickly people's memories fail.
Howard Dean led the majority building the Democrats now enjoy.
|
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I am the enemy of everyone |
|
So does that make me everybody's friend? Or at least, everyone with an enemy.
Damn, I miss junior high school.
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-23-09 11:39 PM
Response to Original message |
7. You DO understand where she's coming from I hope? |
|
I believe her position is fairly simple.
She (rightfully) sees the rise of corporate power permeating our government, leaving the average person powerless.
Agree so far?
The main focus of the whackjobs in the tea bagger movement is basically protesting the same thing, even if they couch their words in constitutionality of government actions.
Still with me?
There is a certain amount of overlap between the 'baggers and the far left, where both sides see the government is broken, corrupted by big money.
Its that sliver of overlap she seems determined to find common ground with, refocusing their anger and increasing the numbers of those on the same page as the left (at least on this issue).
She shouldnt be lambasted for trying, especially by the same centrist Democrats who think Obama had every right sucking up to the right winger Tom Coburn.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message |