Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Defends Health Bill Against Attacks From Left - NPR interview from yesterday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 06:56 AM
Original message
Obama Defends Health Bill Against Attacks From Left - NPR interview from yesterday

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=121783002
Obama Defends Health Bill Against Attacks From Left
by Kevin Whitelaw


December 23, 2009
President Obama hit back at critics within his own party over the landmark health care overhaul packages moving through Congress during an interview with NPR's All Things Considered.

"This notion I know among some on the left that somehow this bill is not everything that it should be ... I think just ignores the real human reality that this will help millions of people and end up being the most significant piece of domestic legislation at least since Medicare and maybe since Social Security," Obama told NPR's Robert Siegel and Julie Rovner.

skip

With the bill set to clear the Senate, the president is beginning to insert himself into negotiations after largely trying to avoid being pinned down on the details of the health care proposals.

Obama told NPR that he supports a key provision in the Senate bill that would raise revenues to pay for the expansive plan by taxing insurers that provide so-called Cadillac plans, or high-end employer-paid insurance plans.



I must say, that story clarifies a point I have not quite understood. So, the insurers are the ones being taxed on the "Cadillac" plans? So that means that the tax will cause those plans to disappear, because the insurance industry will just stop offering them?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think so. And its one example of the many places where I feel like the bill is absurd.
"You keep using that word.... I do not think it means what you think it means."

That's how I feel about the bill. I do not think that its going to do what lawmakers are claiming is going to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. wrong place.
Edited on Thu Dec-24-09 09:11 AM by Tim01
ignore this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. It's going to suck.
Instead of fixing Medicare, they took funding from it and created a sweeping new pile of crap that forces us to buy what they want under threat of fines or jail.

Oh, yeah, I'm really happy about this. :sarcasm: This was crap on a stick shoved down our throats just so that Obama can claim he kept a campaign promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. The Insurance companies will pass their costs on to consumers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's a 40% tax - I doubt anyone will be passing that along or that any
employer would pick it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Obama knows this.
It will probably be an across the board increase for everybody, to offset the tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Union workers gave up wages for better benefits and if the
benefit disappears, they're left empty handed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep. An underhanded way to shaft labor and unions. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC