Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much can HCR be further watered down before you say,

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BP2 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 01:57 PM
Original message
Poll question: How much can HCR be further watered down before you say,
"I cannot support this HCR bill" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm expecting a major left turn in the House. Then I can support it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Without a MAJOR left turn in the House the Dems will be CRUSHED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThePhilosopher04 Donating Member (435 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You are correct...
if this bill doesn't emerge with a strong public option, or at the very least, no mandate, Dems will get slaughtered in 2010 and 2012...this bill is so easy to attack on many fronts - from both the left and the right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What is your expectation based on?
I ask honestly, because several people have mentioned the reconciliation process as the means to a positive end, but I'm not at all convinced that the House version of HCR would win out in committee.

Is there anything you can point to to give me some hope?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BP2 Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Last night, Stupak was very clear that
Edited on Thu Dec-24-09 03:55 PM by BP2
Ben Nelson's amendment was "unacceptable" and it would have to go back to the Senate.

That's why some of us really want Barack to start over. The reward is great, but between the Bleak Dogs and the four moderate Democrats in the Senate, the risk to Barack is also very great if things unravel in the ping pongs between the House and the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. It is political suicide not to make the changes that will improve this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. You might support it
but the Senate will never go for the current House bill, or anything more progressive than it. They've already said to the House, "This is the best you're gonna get, you may as well vote for it."

This whole thing is like a game where you toss a water balloon back and forth as the two sides step further away from each other. You bend over backwards and contort yourself wildly just to be able to catch the thing, because you think if you can toss it over just ONE more time, the other guy will be responsible for breaking it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm hoping the House can get a Medicare buy in passed
for people who reached their corporate expiration date at 55 and have no other access to insurance. Without at least that much, this bill is pure shit.

However, it's better than nothing. I say this as someone who has lived with nothing since 1987, priced out at first and then simply eliminated as an insurable person for the last 10 years.

Whether or not I can afford it now is debatable.

To say I'm disgusted by conservative Democrats in the Senate is a massive understatement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Other: indifferent re Obama, do not support this grotesquely Orwellian "reform."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-24-09 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. I am waiting to see what the final product looks like. Then I will know how
much to gnash my teeth and rend my garments. (Okay, I probably won't do that. But I might come here and complain if the end product is a true disaster.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC