Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Passions over 'prosperity gospel': Was Jesus wealthy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 08:42 AM
Original message
Passions over 'prosperity gospel': Was Jesus wealthy?
By John Blake, CNN
December 25, 2009 4:12 a.m. EST

(CNN) -- Each Christmas, Christians tell stories about the poor baby Jesus born in a lowly manger because there was no room in the inn.
But the Rev. C. Thomas Anderson, senior pastor of the Living Word Bible Church in Mesa, Arizona, preaches a version of the Christmas story that says baby Jesus wasn't so poor after all.
Anderson says Jesus couldn't have been poor because he received lucrative gifts -- gold, frankincense and myrrh -- at birth. Jesus had to be wealthy because the Roman soldiers who crucified him gambled for his expensive undergarments. Even Jesus' parents, Mary and Joseph, lived and traveled in style, he says.
"Mary and Joseph took a Cadillac to get to Bethlehem because the finest transportation of their day was a donkey," says Anderson. "Poor people ate their donkey. Only the wealthy used it as transportation."
Many Christians see Jesus as the poor, itinerant preacher who had "no place to lay his head." But as Christians gather around the globe this year to celebrate the birth of Jesus, another group of Christians are insisting that Jesus' beginnings weren't so humble.
They say that Jesus was never poor -- and neither should his followers be. Their claim is embedded in the doctrine known as the prosperity gospel, which holds that God rewards the faithful with financial prosperity and spiritual gifts.

more:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/wayoflife/12/25/RichJesus/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Mary and Joseph took a Cadillac to get to Bethlehem".
I thought I was reading the Onion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. "So all you poor people can just STFU and sit down." - Anderson
Edited on Fri Dec-25-09 08:48 AM by SpiralHawk
"Rich Republicons are holier than you noisy Proles, so just STFU and put your few skanky dollars into my collection plate so I can make myself an even holier Republicon preacherman. Smirk."

- Anderson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Prosperity Pimps..
.. had their hand in the current economic mess. By convincing so many of their flocks that god wants them to be wealthy and that wealth is god's reward for a virtuous life, I'm totally convinced that this mindset contributed greatly to folks tendency to take on way more debt than they could handle. God will pay it off huh.

That didn't work out too well for them and that's only right, Jesus couldn't have been less about material possessions and anyone who thinks otherwise might want to actually read the Bible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. This guy is
filled with shit. And on Christmas yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Jesus was unemployed & homeless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. God hates poor people.
How Calvinistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. "gambled for his expensive undergarments", so THAT'S Victoria's secret
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. It could be argued that Jesus' family, if they and he even existed, might have been well to do.
Certainly a carpenter would be a highly skilled and needed trade in those days. Sorry, the message was never "Believe in me and you'll be rich" or there are a whole lot of Christians getting cheated by the Holy Payroll department. Someone in accounting is embezzling from the Big J.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ah, another seeker of truth has found the Gospel of Supply Side Jesus..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. So Jesus was rich and he also liked to make war...
Jesus is George W. Bush!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well, he had an infinite supply of wine, bread and fishes
Edited on Fri Dec-25-09 09:39 AM by Kurt_and_Hunter
So, yeah... he did okay. And that health plan was way better than mine.

<joke>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. Nah...Jesus wasn't rich. It took a while after his death
before the evangelists started raking it in. Jesus wouldn't have approved, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-25-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
13. I want the evidence for donkey eating.
That's not something I have ever heard of.

And only an idiot would call donkey transport "luxury" when the wealthy owned and rode horses.Does this ill-educated twit NOT know that horses were in the Roman-controlled area? That both the Egyptians and Alexander the Great used horses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC