Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:14 PM
Original message |
Poll question: What if 30% of American men aged 18 to 30 never flirted with a woman or asked for her phone number? |
Flaneur
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I have no fucking clue what you're on about with this one. |
|
But that's not unusual with this poster.
|
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Does "this poster" refer to you or does it refer to me? |
rug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
3. You'll get skewed results if you post this poll on an internet message board. |
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. "if you post this poll on an internet message board" |
|
Your dedication to representative samples is admirable, but your warning arrived too late. This poll has now been posted.
|
foo_bar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. I doubt it would describe the universe any better with random participants |
|
Anyone who plods through all the potential responses is already self selecting for an ability to stomach thinly veiled misogyny.
|
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. Please specify at least one answer option that shouldn't have been provided. |
|
Also, please formulate at least one answer option that ought to have been, but wasn't, included.
|
foo_bar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. it's hard for me to say, my eyes rolled all the way back to my head halfway through |
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
20. "it's hard for me to say" |
|
When your eyes roll all the way back, is the cause always exposure to misogyny? Even if the cause always is exposure to misogyny, isn't it possible that you were exposed to some misogyny via your peripheral vision, coincidentally at the time that you were reading the poll answer options?
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
23. You probly won't get skewed |
|
if you don't hit on anyone.
|
rug
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
30. That's the problem with polling internet addicts in the first place. |
deadmessengers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
5. now where's that bunny-pancake picture when I need it n/t |
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Is it a real picture of a bunny with a pancake on the head, or just a photo-shopped one? |
|
We need an authentic picture of a bunny with a pancake on the head, or we are doomed to remain in the realm of purely hypothetical bunny-pancake situations.
In 1928, when the economy had reached a permanently high plateau, only a fool would have asked, "what if the stock market crashes next year?"
|
Cirque du So-What
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |
6. What in pluperfect hell does 30% have to do with this question? |
|
Would 25% or 40% make a difference? Who cares anyway?
|
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. It's just a hypothetical, chosen to be... |
|
... enough to matter (e.g., one tenth of one percent wouldn't be noticed)
... but not so much as to strain the imagination (e.g., it wouldn't suddenly become 70% without first arriving at 30% and attracting attention at 30%. Also, poll participants might be unable to imagine it ever actually reaching 70%).
|
HysteryDiagnosis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |
8. This is a trick question.... all of the above. n/t |
timeforpeace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message |
10. When polls become stream of consciousness essays, the terrorists have won. |
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message |
12. 10 responses, a single vote--let me guess whose... nt |
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
16. Go ahead and guess. Your guess is as good as mine. |
undeterred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:35 PM
Response to Original message |
surrealAmerican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message |
14. What do you suppose the current percentage is? |
|
Assuming that about 10% of men in that age group are gay, and perhaps another 10 to 20% are socially inept, or think they don't stand a chance; I'd say there would be no difference.
|
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
17. Well, I assumed that it was less than 30%. |
|
Of course, my assumption was just a guess, and you raised an important point that needs to be considered.
|
katkat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |
19. that would be demoralizing |
|
flirt, make out, whatever, just use birth control.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message |
21. You post a lot of incomprehensible gibberish, you know that? |
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. Well, at least I don't make the body of my message a statement that the message has no body. n/t |
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
24. Hey, I love these polls. Speak for yourself! |
Edweird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message |
25. None of the above. How do we know that already isn't the case? |
|
How many men are currently incapable of initiating contact with women?
|
hayu_lol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
26. If that were to happen... |
|
then 30% of 16 year old girls would be dating 31 year old men wouldn't they?
|
Edweird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
32. It's not 1-for-1 out there. |
|
Some guys get lots of girls. Some get none. Unless things have changed dramatically since I was that age, plenty of teenage girls prefer older guys for a number of reasons.
|
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
27. My vote currently speaks for 11% of those (average age unknown) particpating |
proteus_lives
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
28. What's the point of the poll? |
TlalocW
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 05:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
That would be bad. Lack of experience would make 30% of American men aged 18 to 30 less competent socially. (first one)
Mainly because that's my situation. :) I can think of flirting once as it was done as an obvious joke between 18 and 30 in San Antonio. A friend of mine and I were on the Riverwalk, and one of the restaurants had an attractive Mexican-American waitress out front, and she asked us, "Do you want to come in for a margarita." I replied as nerdily and stiffly as I could, "That depends. Is your name Margarita? Hot-cha hot-cha!" It took her a second, but she clued into my type of sense of humor and started laughing with my friend.
Anyway, I've lost out on many opportunities because I never caught onto when girls liked me because I'm so socially incompetent. :)
TlalocW
|
hayu_lol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #29 |
31. The Riverwalk, even in early '54, was... |
AndyA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 06:03 PM
Response to Original message |
33. Maybe they're gay and don't care to date women? n/m |
inna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
perhaps belonging in the lounge, but...
|
FreedomRain
(164 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
"That would be bad for a reason not listed above, and to be posted in this thread."
30% Would have been my rough guess for the actual number anyway. It is bad because that leaves the jerks to get all the women. (Not that all extroverts are jerks , maybe only 1/3 of them.)
|
treestar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 11:14 PM
Response to Original message |
36. Do you really want women taking the initiative? |
|
Aggressive women are really scary to men and often labeled "desperate."
|
JonQ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
|
just like guys can be deemed either charming and confident, or creepy and stalkerish for pursuing a woman. All depends on the execution (being easy on the eyes and well off doesn't hurt either).
|
BlueJazz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-25-09 11:19 PM
Response to Original message |
37. To get to the other side. |
JonQ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 12:28 AM
Response to Original message |
39. Probably would lead to more equality |
|
when it comes to who is going to the extra effort to impress members of the opposite sex.
Not sure why there are so many angry responses to this poll.
|
Common Sense Party
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 12:43 AM
Response to Original message |
40. If those 30% are married, they shouldn't be flirting with anyone else |
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 12:45 AM
Response to Original message |
41. What kind of stupid fucking question is this? |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 12:45 AM by Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
hypothectical or not it's unrealistic.
|
trackfan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message |
42. What leads you to assume that more than 70% have done such? |
Liberal In Texas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 12:58 AM by Liberal In Texas
Men had NO penises? Men could have babies? Women were slave masters that needed no men and procreated by artificial insemination? Or cloning? We could wish people into the cornfield? There was magic we could buy in a shop? (Real magic!) Al Gore was President? Al Franken was President? Sara Palin was President? There was no gas? Nobody ate meat? Aliens invade? Nobody liked you anymore?
I mean you can set up all kinds of "what if" scenarios. All most all science fiction is based on it.
Men not flirting with women? Are you a member of some advance party of extraterrestrials coming to Earth from Venus where women rule to change society?
I nominate this as the stupidest post and poll of the week.
|
FreeState
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 02:00 AM
Response to Original message |
44. I love it when people assume everyone is not gay |
|
Seriously - nothing like assuming there are no gay men...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:32 AM
Response to Original message |