FOR those who are not familiar with the darker side of the Gates Foundation, background information is required.
http://boycottnovell.com/wiki/index.php/Gates_Foundation_CritiqueRecently there has been a lot of coverage about Bill Gates; it’s a lot to do with his patent games in Africa <1, 2, 3, 4, 5>, not just his tax-exempt Gates Foundation.
http://boycottnovell.com/2009/10/26/gates-rockefeller-green-foundations/The Monsanto affair grows stronger as more and more money is getting pumped into its patent-based business. In the following new article we have found the term “green revolution” again (a revolution whereby impoverished populations become dependent on US patents) and Gates is said to be investing a billion dollar in this. It’s not a charity, it’s an investment, a business activity...If this revolution is truly green, then how come “environmentalists” (as Bill Gates arrogantly calls them) oppose it so strongly...?
Here is where it gets really infuriating. At the beginning of the year we showed that Bill and Melinda were using fabricated numbers
http://aidwatchers.com/2009/02/made-up-malaria-data-round-2-gates-foundation-responds-who-graciously-offers-not-to-respond/and instructing governments to give taxpayers' money to companies Bill and Melinda were investing in.
http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/31/bm-foundry-closing-a-loop/What we’re not supposed to know is that by “global health” Gates refers to the very same pharmaceutical giants whose patents he invests billions of dollars in <1, 2, 3>...
http://boycottnovell.com/2009/11/02/gates-africa-un-education/The chief of malaria for the World Health Organization has complained that the growing dominance of malaria research by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation risks stifling a diversity of views among scientists and wiping out the world health agency’s policy-making function.
“Many of the world’s leading malaria scientists are now “locked up in a ‘cartel’ with their own research funding being linked to those of others within the group,” Dr. Kochi wrote. Because “each has a vested interest to safeguard the work of the others,” he wrote, getting independent reviews of research proposals “is becoming increasingly difficult.”
“Also, he argued, the foundation’s determination to have its favored research used to guide the health organization’s recommendations “could have implicitly dangerous consequences on the policy-making process in world health.””
–New York Times, 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/science/16malaria.html?_r=2