|
There are lots of different kinds of RWers, just like not everybody on the left defines "freedom" the same way.
For some, freedom involves having Congress stipulate buying health insurance. Freedom for them focuses on the right to health care, not being free from government interference. Of course, that freedom comes at the cost of having people who otherwise wouldn't buy insurance being forced to purchase it.
For some, freedom means no warrantless wiretapping of a phone call that involves an American in the US. Freedom is freedom from having the government eavesdrop, even if wiretapping the overseas person might be okay (opinions are divided on that). Freedom for them means being free from government interference, even at the risk of undetected attacks.
For some, freedom means that restaurants can't do certain things, or that smokers can't smoke in their own apts. Freedom means freedom from having to worry about bad food, or the freedom to only choose the kind of things that they like. They want freedom, even though it means others are less free.
For some, freedom means freedom from things like drug tests or vindictive anti-drug laws. They want freedom, even though cannabis--like alchohol--impairs coordination for a full 24 hours after use, so using things like forklifts becomes a bit more dangerous. Freedom is freedom for their actions, even if it increases risk to others.
For yet others, freedom is also freedom from hate speech. I've known more than one self-styled progressive who wanted to have some penalty for offensive speech. Their right to be free from perceived intimidation outweighed the other person's right to speak freely.
Now, all of these freedoms have some price. Some are freedom from government, writ at whatever size you want; some are freedom from other citizens. Freedom always involves not being subject to the whims or vagaries of something else. Freedom from worry, freedom from making bad choices, freedom from the consequences of other people's choices, freedom from government interference or observation. You are not subject to them, they do not coerce or compel you.
Now, some RWers believe in freedom to do what you want in your bedroom. Some don't. Some believe that if you're homosexual you don't have a right to marry--some for reasons of religion or culture or tradition, and they won't want to be forced to change. Some because it would require additional resources to go to gays, and they don't want to pay. Some simply don't want the government to dictate the outcome of something that is moral, religious, or cultural. (That's my wife; she's got no objection to anything here but the government's deciding for everybody.)
Some RWers want freedom from having your views foisted on them. They want to be free from being offended. Others want the freedom to only have people decide from a limited palette of choices. They want freedom from making bad choices. Others want freedom from having the government tell them what to do. They want freedom from government interference and control.
The way I put things just now was intentional. Many liberals/progressives and many conservatives/RWers are absolutely in agreement as to what freedom is. They just want freedom from different things, they want compulsion in different areas. They want the government to leave them alone when they want to be left alone, they want government to be dictatorial when they want to coerce and compel behavior. The difference isn't to be found in views of freedom (well, you can, but you really have to put a mask over the dataset so only some data are available for viewing). The difference isn't even always to be found in goals, because many arch-RWers that I know really don't want people to go hungry or die just because they're poor. Often the difference is found in morality and goals. Quite often, though, it's found elsewhere. But that's a completely different post for a different kind of thread.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(419 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
