Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:25 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Jane Hamsher, Rahm Emmanuel & Grover Norquist |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 08:26 PM by Junkdrawer
|
Sarah Ibarruri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Jane? Is that you? (and you've brought your palsies with you?) nt |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 08:27 PM by Sarah Ibarruri
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Seems like a fair range of options to me, but I guess that Rahm's defenders... |
|
would be unhappy with any poll other than a range of horrible deaths for Jane.
|
Sarah Ibarruri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. Oh so it is you, Jane! nt |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Sarah Ibarruri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. I don't have a boyfriend named Grover Norquist. My name isn't Jane. nt |
Name removed
(0 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
|
Sarah Ibarruri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
22. Again, I do not accept $ from Repukes like Ralphie, nor do I worship at the ass of |
|
Grover Norquist like Janie.
Stop accusing me of either of those behaviors. Blame your own leaders, Ralphie and Janie of being Repukes.
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
19. Jane, to the Firebaggers... |
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
23. She's the one who set her flying monkeys on the blogosphere |
|
to support her stupidity.
I'm just waiting for somebody to dump a bucket of water on her, but it;s more likely Norquist will drown her in the bathtub, and her little firebaggers, too.
|
TeaBagsAreForCups
(320 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Go Jane, you're a true progressive... |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 08:31 PM by TeaBagsAreForCups
... it's well past time for the day to throw Rahm off the boat; he's proven to be little more than our own Captain Queeg.
If this "investigation" moves us closer to that day, so much the better.
Then, just then, maybe we might start to enjoy all of that true and actual progressive "hope and change" promised to us by the President during his campaign.
|
rwheeler31
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. There is no real reason for all this acrimony. |
|
Do you want health care reform or not? Lots of attention seekers out there.
|
TeaBagsAreForCups
(320 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
29. "Do you want health care reform or not?..." |
|
... the operative term being "reform."
|
varelse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I support the demand for transparency but I'm very puzzled by the decision to ally with Norquist.
I will say that this whole episode has made me curious to learn more about Grover Norquist, though. I wonder how many conservatives are expressing essentially the same concerns about his alliance with a progressive, pro-big-government liberal blogger.
|
ipaint
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Michelle Malkin can't stand that he partners with liberal groups. nt |
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
8. I have had the same thoughts. Rahm is obviously pro-corporate... |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 08:46 PM by Junkdrawer
so why would Norquist agree to take him down? Then I remembered that we have an oligopoly, not a dictatorship, so there are a range of competing interests at the top.
|
Fumesucker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Ok, so how does the rest of the joke go?
|
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. The bartender says "We don't serve weasles here".... |
|
And Jane says "It's OK, they're with me."
|
Forkboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:44 PM
Response to Original message |
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Grover the unfriendly monster and Rahm the angry dwarf should share a prison cell |
|
since they are both treasonous swine, both guilty of the same thing. Enabling corporatist fascism.
|
dhpgetsit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I think we should partner with people on the right when we the cause is good. |
|
For example I think we can definitely enlist tea-party types to oppose WTO and some of the evil trade agreements that are costing us jobs.
|
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
Cessna Invesco Palin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:01 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Other: Nobody cares. What the fuck is wrong with you people? n/t |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:04 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Other: when I see a red hot poker being thrust at Rahm's ass, I don't give a shit who is wielding it |
tnlefty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
Really, love your response and it made me snort. :toast:
|
TeaBagsAreForCups
(320 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
LWolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:12 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't know enough about Hamsher to take a solid position.
I dislike Rahm Emmanuel as much as I do Grover Norquist.
Anything legitimate that clips Emmanuel's wings is fine with me.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |
26. ... walked into a bar |
|
(only way to save this one.)
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:16 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Wow this is a pretty strong indictment of rahm. |
Junkdrawer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
28. I did a poll the other day and 86% think Rahm needs to go.... |
ProSense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
32. Yup, less than 100 DUers |
|
call the AG right now.
:rofl:
|
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
33. He has 13% support. That is George Bush type numbers. |
madrchsod
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
31. rahm is a neo- republican! ..no wait.... he`s a neo- liberal! |
|
he`s everything to everyone!
someone cue-up Cream`s "Politician"
|
juno jones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Dec-26-09 11:03 PM
Response to Original message |
34. Why aren't we discussing the fact that Rahm is up to his eyeballs in |
|
Edited on Sat Dec-26-09 11:06 PM by juno jones
improprieties with Freddie and Fannie and whatever, Jane and Grover are WWC, they are Jerry Springer, they are Brangelina.
What a fucking distraction.
If there is evidence Rahm did us wrong, abused his post and betrayed the people, then all means it should be looked at. We have DO a transparent damn governmment and all, right everybody? :puke:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message |