Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What would folks here say if Obama invited Limbaugh to the Whitehouse for a meeting?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:09 PM
Original message
What would folks here say if Obama invited Limbaugh to the Whitehouse for a meeting?
Limbaugh is arguably the Leader of the Republican Party at the moment. Republicans do make up a substantial portion of America and can not just be shut out. It would be interesting to see if there were anything at all that they could agree upon. If there were anything they shared Common Ground with. Then Obama could start with that. I think it is important for someone to begin to Unite America instead of the opposite. Obama is trying hard to do just that and in fact many here think he is doing way to much of that. IMO if he is to really achieve Greatness it will be for that and not Reforming Health Care or Transforming our Economy..I think inviting Rush Limbaugh for a one on one meeting would be extremely good Politics. Sort of like sending a personal letter to the leader of North Korea or setting up a personal meeting with the Russian President..Find Common Ground and expand upon it..If America continues to have such a Divide, governing will become virtually impossible. Rush Limbaugh is their current Leader and so that is where it should begin. "Nothing Ventured, Nothing Gained."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Our President has high standards. The thought of an event of that
nature would never cross his mind. Rahm....well maybe..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Why
Edited on Sun Dec-27-09 12:26 PM by Kalun D
would your thoughts and ideals be any different at all from your right hand man?

Since Obama installed Rahm, did he not know how he was? Or is he just using him to do his dirty work so he can keep his hands clean?

It's all a clever ruse, a shell game, Obama is just bush with a higher polish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think it should have already be done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. About the same things as were said when he invited that nutjob
to give the invocation (is that the right term?) at the inauguration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. If
Rush left the WH with a bruised face (pretzel damage, ya know) and a pronounced limp from his right leg and muttering something about how he was mandated, I'd say: justice delivered.

Otherwise it would be a waste of time. Obama needs to be bipartisan with the dem folks first.... the pubbies are a waste of time unless they come away limping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. same thing they say about Obama continuing GW Bush policies nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. In other words, you're admitting that you don't know jack-squat..
about what people who support the President think.

Give it a fucking rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'd say: Can I come & watch?
After Bill Shanter intellectually pummeled Rush, I would love to see what Obama could do to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Limbaugh is a racist, sexist, homphobic POS...there are people
one should never try and united with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Shouldn't Regis be invited first?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SargeUNN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. problem is Rush is a fraud
Rush is interested only in Rush and has no desire to be part of an America discussion for solutions. He is just an airbag and will not be part of any meaningful discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. Rush's influence extends to approximately 20% of the population.
They aren't going to form a more positive impression of our president because of a meeting at the White House. Neither will Rush, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. Where did you get you figures?????????
The U.S. population is about 305 million people and Rush's audience, at it's most optimistic, is between 14 and 20 million. That just doesn't add up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #33
43. I was guessing.
It's the number who still think Bush was the best president EVAH! So I figure they all tune in to Rush to find out what they're supposed to be thinking today. Pesky math, anyhow. I guess you're saying I overstated his influence by about 14 percent.

I stand (happily) corrected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. wtf? if he wants to do something good, then do it-sucking corporate ass is not good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. Actually
Edited on Sun Dec-27-09 12:24 PM by Kalun D
Obama and Limbaugh probably agree on some major issues. Like the bankers and health insurers should be unregulated and we should continue our wars for oil and defense industry profits.

I think the antagonism exhibited by the pigboy is in many ways just a big act, to feed the contrived divisiveness of left and right. The false dichotomy fabricated by the wealthy elite, to divide and conquer, to distract from the real conflict of the haves and the have nots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. IT'S ONLY A 2 MINUTE PRAYER!1!!!!11!@(elevens)
Something like that, anyhow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't want that fat, hate-mongering slob infesting the people's house. I don't care
how important you think this cretin is, he is a vile, despicable, fear-and-hate mongering bigot, who really ought to be in jail, NOT EVER invited into the people's house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caretha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. + 1000 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
35. Sadly, the stench of the pigboy already hangs in the air at the WH,
courtesy of two previous invitations - one from each Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
17. "Hide the good silver."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. I would say nothing---The President can invite anyone he wants,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'd argue that this radio jock itch represents NO party, as you do...
... His Reagan-era program of jock itch helped undo the one-time base of the Republican party, nothing more.

Therefore, what reason would Obama EVER have to invite this under-educated, corporatist, bag of shit "in" to the White House? Answer: None.

That bouncing pile of shit radio jock itch should keep doing what he's best at- making money from lies. They are quickly catching up with him, as he continues taking his Oxy-laden drugs. I'm betting that one day, they same interested group of people at Fox and Friends will report finding his bloated dead ass on the commode after squeezing out one after a good ole valsalva maneuver

(apologies to Elvis Presley's family).

... that's what I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. I don't think you legitimize a racist bigot like Limbaugh by bringing him to the WH.
I see nothing wrong with having a WH page meeting him at a drug rehab center.

Of course, Obama could invite him to the WH. It's not like he ever said that anybody who goes on Limbaugh's show is a traitor. If Obama needs a bit of help in finding common ground between himself and a RW nutjob like Limbaugh, he could always ask Jane Hamsher to broker a deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
21. He already hugged Rick Warren
same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevCheesehead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. "I hope Obama has a strong stomach."
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. The republicans have had us right where they want us for years
I use to be one of those moderate demdocrats that wanted to compromise. We've been seeking common ground with the republicans for years now. We've wanted to bring people together and find common ground so desperately that we've been doing all the compromising. The republicans don't compromise on anything. They know we won't fight for anything and therefore know they can have anything they want. The democrats are too far to the right now due to those compromises and I will no longer support compromising with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. Why invite someone who's being paid $33 million to call for your destruction every day
and show him as much respect as you would show to someone like Tan Boehner, who's at least elected by some people?

And our president has already done lots of your "extremely good politics"-- inviting conservative personalities for a private dinner before he invited progressives, and stuff like that.

We've already done your "extremely good politics" and pandered to the right by making the HCR bill weaker and weaker just to get one little Republican vote. Our president already gambled away our national health security to play that Grovelling Bipartisan Game-- Get That One Right Wing Vote At All Costs game.

Been there, done that. Compromising and capitulating to those who vow to destroy you or at least obstruct your efforts-- that has been done already. Quite a few times.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Well Said, Overseas.

I'm not very happy with Obama as it is, and I've been giving some casual thought to what might force me to take my dissatisfaction to a higher, more publicly-organized level---I think an official Limbaugh ass-kissing would do the trick, for me and a lot of other people. When will it dawn on Obama and other Democrats that being nice to Republicans gets us absolutely nowhere? Exhibit A: The year of 2009......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #28
45. That willingness to give up our national health security to make a vote 1% bipartisan
was really disheartening.

Those disparaging comments about the Democrats hoping for more thorough change have also been really depressing.

I really had such a beautiful dream about my 21st Century FDR. And the times really provided such a mandate for a clean break from the torturers of yore. So seeing my new president kissing up to the party that supported those criminals has been really painful for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
25. Limbaugh is a radio talk show host. His lunacy may be the party's
mantra but he is not their leader and he shouldn't be treated as anything but a two-bit hack critic. You think Limbaugh and Hannity and O'Reilly and Coulter wouldn't be all over the airways touting Rush's victory over Obama? What victory you ask? In case you haven't noticed there doesn't need to be one, they will make it up.

It would be politically disastrous for Obama should he invite Limbaugh to the WH. You think the liberals who are being ignored now are pissed off? Wait till they are ignored in favor of entertaining Rush Limbaugh's lunacy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
26. HE'S ONLY GOING TO SING ONE SONG!1!!!11!!!!11!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johnny Harpo Donating Member (330 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. Then Rush Could Claim That Obama Wanted The Meeting Because.....
the President needed Rush's advice.

The last place Rush needs to be is anywhere near the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
29. Nothing good could come of collaborating with madmen, megalomaniacs, and fascists.
Ask the French.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caretha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
31. What have you been smoking? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty fender Donating Member (442 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #31
51. Exactly! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duke Newcombe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
32. hide the silverware...
...and any young boys and prescription meds...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
34. I don't think we need any more 'events' to analyze. I've had my fill.
Edited on Sun Dec-27-09 01:43 PM by peacetalksforall
The torture one has me extremely depressed - more than what the insurance companies seem to be thrilled about along with th prospect of them making more money than before.

I'm scared.

He has choices and he is not paying any attention to the people I admire and trust. Nada.

Exception: those who received life achievement cmedals two weeks ago - but I don't really know how they were/are selected.

Count me as a person very depressed ending this year and starting another with NO PROGRESS and NO REVERSALS of any Cheney and baron Republican dictums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
36. HE'S ONLY GOING TO EAT ONE SIDE OF BEEF!!!!!11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressIn2008 Donating Member (848 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
37. Some would say it's a brilliant move indicative of historic leadership. Just a wild guess. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #37
46. That would only come after the wailing and gnashing of teeth, the rending of garments,
and the great hue and cry.

After it was confirmed to be happening, THEN you'd see the spinners saying it was historic leadership in action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
38. No I wouldn't want him elevating that slime to that degree
and Obama wouldn't do that, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #38
48. But he already has. And far worse than Limbaugh.
Unless, of course, you think the people responsible for "informing" the world that gays have an average life expectancy of 42 because we eat feces (when we're not trolling playgrounds) are more above-board than Limbaugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
39. Maybe he could invite the "Ow My Balls!" airline bomber too...
... and a couple of those hookers who used to service the Bush White House. (Ewwwwww.)

Viagra, Oxycodone, X, beer, and whatever that shit was Bush was drinking when the pretzel choked him... maybe even invite Dick Cheney to shoot someone in the face and Rick Warren to save some souls. Yep, lock 'em all in a room, post the Secret Service outside to make sure none of them get out, and PARTY!

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billh58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
40. Limpballs is the
Republican "leader" only in his own bigoted, little, drug-impaired mind -- and apparently in yours as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
41. If he had high standards, he wouldn't have appointed Rahm. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
42. An invitation to Limbaugh would do 2 things:
increase his audience and give him material for months to come. Of course he shouldn't be asked to the White House. He's a whackjob radio host for heaven's sake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
44. Hey Obama, see if you can get Rush to mix beer & Oxy.
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 01:53 AM by laststeamtrain
Maybe the fat fuck would nod out.

That'd be a headline I'd like to read.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
47. Why not? He's already done worse.
Never mind Rick Warren and Donnie McClurkin; this administration has already hosted such hatemongering, lunatic theocrats as Focus on the Family, Concerned Women for America, and the Family Research Council (to name just three) for cozy little chats at the White House.

So, Limbaugh? Sure, why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
voc Donating Member (279 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
49. I wouldn't say anything . I would just LOL, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
50. a good idea only because it would finally show what a bad idea bipartisanship is
I think Bill Clinton did this once and Limbaugh didn't bite.

You are very naive if you think Limbaugh would want to find common ground. I can remember a kind of conservative commentator who might have taken that kind of bait, but they are few and far between now, and those that survive have no pull with the teabagger, religious right, frothing base of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pissedoff01 Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
52. Wouldn't surprise me a bit. Gotta be bipartisan and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
53. i would pray that President Obama would not dignify the pusbag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
54. DU would have a meltdown
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC