Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

That would be bomber. How did we screw up again?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jellen Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:11 PM
Original message
That would be bomber. How did we screw up again?
How are we going to keep these guys off the planes, when we can't even keep party crashers out of the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Remember that recent pdf file from TSA...
...with the stuff that was improperly blacked out?

There's one way we screwed up. I'm sure there are more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who's "we"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellen Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Homeland security etal !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You mean 'they' then - I'm not in the TSA or any DHS agency
Does TSA run the screening in Amsterdam? If not, it's the Dutch who should answer that question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. He was flying INTO the US, not OUT of the US..how did "they" screw anything up?
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 01:25 PM by truebrit71
..when "they" weren't the ones responsible for the initial screening??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jellen Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. If WE didn't screw up, why is Obama calling for"Looking into the incident ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Because if he said "The Dutch screwed the pooch on this one, we're fine"..
...the right-wing M$M presstitutes would be all over him..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. Exactly!
People seem to forget the US TSA is not in charge of the whole fucking world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Touché Jellen, Touché!
Good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. In November TSA and Federal Aviation inspected Lagos airport security
and gave it a green light. Furthermore the US did not act upon the father's warning so yes the US is implicated in this security foulup.

snip

The fact that there are flights to Europe means there would have been European and international oversight," said John Trevett, who runs Flightsafe Consultants in Milton Keynes, England. Mr. Trevett said that each European airline serving Lagos would have independently assessed the airport's security to satisfy its national authorities.

Lagos is one of the few African airports that several non-African carriers serve, which helps improve scrutiny of both security and air-safety by foreign authorities. Nigeria's Arik Air Ltd. on Dec. 4 began nonstop service to New York's John F. Kennedy Airport, offering the first direct, scheduled link between Nigeria and the U.S. in many years. Before the service began, the airport and Nigerian aviation infrastructure was thoroughly inspected by U.S. authorities including the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Transport Security Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126192167418806379.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. In November the Homeland Security"s TSA and Federal Aviation inspected
the Lagos airport and gave it a green light. Furthermore the US did not act upon the father's warning so yes the US is implicated in this security foulup.

snip

The fact that there are flights to Europe means there would have been European and international oversight," said John Trevett, who runs Flightsafe Consultants in Milton Keynes, England. Mr. Trevett said that each European airline serving Lagos would have independently assessed the airport's security to satisfy its national authorities.

Lagos is one of the few African airports that several non-African carriers serve, which helps improve scrutiny of both security and air-safety by foreign authorities. Nigeria's Arik Air Ltd. on Dec. 4 began nonstop service to New York's John F. Kennedy Airport, offering the first direct, scheduled link between Nigeria and the U.S. in many years. Before the service began, the airport and Nigerian aviation infrastructure was thoroughly inspected by U.S. authorities including the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Transport Security Administration and the Federal Aviation Administration.


http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126192167418806379.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLTopStories
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Well, what would one expect of Hoaxland Security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Um..if anyone screwed up it was the Dutch authorities...
..they are the ones that didn't think it was weird that a guy with no luggage and a ticket paid for in cash wasn't worth a second look..I bet a 30 second search of whatever database they use would have pulled up the red flag the Brits had on him...seems to me someone in Holland wasn't doing their job properly on Xmas day...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. The flight originated in Amsterdam, so "we" couldn't prevent it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. The bomber boarded in Lagos at an airpost that just had been
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 02:31 PM by snagglepuss
inspected by US Homeland Security (TSA) and Federal Aviation. Security checks at Schinpol are different for passengers simply transferring to connecting flights which is not to say they don't also bare responsibilty howver US authorities would be aware of the Dutch protocols. Furthermore the guy should never have received a US visa in the first place. Its effing incompetence that the UK refused him a visa but the US who had warnings from his father issued a visa.


I really can't understand the attitude you and some other's share which seems to be deny US responsibilty even though existing evidence shows the US dropped the ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. The UK visa was only refused because he applied for a fraudulent college course,not because of any
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 03:28 PM by HipChick
terrorist potential
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Providing fraudulent reasons for entering a country is grounds for
suspecting nefarious activity so that denial should have raised alarms especially given his trips to Yemen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. We? We, the people, didn't screw up. In fact, the people saved the plane.
Passengers stopped the bombing attempt -- just as with the shoe bomber, and just as passengers died but successfully stopped the terrorist use of Flight 93 on 9/11. The immune system has been working. It's the formal system that has been screwing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. How not to screw up again - keep the GOP out of the White House
problem solved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. You're assuming that security checks are for terrorists
and not for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC