Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

That's all they had to do.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 04:40 PM
Original message
That's all they had to do.
All Obama and the democratic congress had to do was put together a healthcare bill based on traditional democratic principles and come out fighting hard for it. That's all we ever wanted to see and that's all they had to do to avoid splitting the party and the infighting on DU. I"m not giving up my principles. This bipartisan junk should be stuffed into the nearest dumpster with all the other trash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FLDCVADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bipartisan?
The fighting isn't with the Republicans, it's among the Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. That isn't true exactly
The corporate wing of Dems put things in the bill that were "appealing" to Snowe and Collins HOPING they would vote for it so they could call it "bipartisan"...and in essence, stripping out ANYTHING remotely progressive in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. They were hoping for Snowe or Collins
because it was believed they would be easier to deal with than Traitor Joe. Just one defecting Republic would prevent Joe from his filibuster threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. and your post isn't true either
10 billion for CHCs is progressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The only item in the shit bill even worth the ink.
But it is not enough to make this pile acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. and that didn't happen until late in the game - so YOUR post is disingenuous
Bernie had to pout, ala Nelson, to get that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. 900 billion dollar expenditure does not justify a 10 billion dollar program
Sure expanding community clinics is liberal policy but I can't help but to think we'd get more actual health care by just putting a hundred billion into that effort than giving 800+ billion to profitcare that people won't be able to afford to use.

Don't get me wrong, I'd have zero problem using the resources to do something that would actually help the American people but this Senate bill is a joke without a funny punchline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great OP
I completely agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 05:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's the conserva-Dems killing the "traditional democratic principles" that you
mention. So like it or not, your idea wouldn't have worked with the Senate we have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sure. Ask Joe (I-Aetna) Lieberman.
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 06:04 AM by denem
Democratic principles went out the Senate Door now every motion is filibustered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. They never fought for it.
They could have applied pressure to Lieberman and the conserva-dems. I didn't see any pressure being applied, did you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. They could have shouted it publicly, and got Mr Integrity's back up,
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 06:16 AM by denem
hollered on by his Honorable friend Sen. McCain. Senators love to be publicly threatened. Ask McCarthy.

60 - Nil
The Bill needed 60 - Nil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. They could have even hit the Republicans over their lockstep conformity
Didn't you love the "Lockstep Watch" campaign, with Democrats bringing up the Republicans' Soviet-esque voting pattern (95% or more followink the Party Line) every time they had an interview or had face time on a talk show?


What? You didn't see that?

Neither did anyone else :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. G.Carlin's take on it: "Bipartisan = a larger than usual deception is being carried out."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
11. "60" isn't now nor has it EVER been needed.
You'd think Senators would have read the Constitution.

Instead, we get nothing except phony excuses.

Never again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Yes it is. Get your facts straight.
Not everything in life is written in the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. Agree 100%
Even if they'd compromised down to what they have now, I'd have been happy if they'd at least come out fighting for and tried like hell for a much better bill. Instead they gave everything away right at the beginning, then caved further to Joe. There was no compromise, everything was tossed in the garbage from the start.

I think that's what pisses off the progressives/liberals I know the most. The fact that they didn't even try for single payer and bargain downwards. Had they done that, the insurance companies would've gotten on board with the compromises fairly quickly. Being allowed to continue to exist at all is a hell of an incentive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
15. K & R
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
18. It would be so much better if you were in high office
You from your keyboard see how easy it all is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
19. The bipartisanship claim is bogus. The Republicans wouldn't support
any bill. That was and is their strategy. The fact is, we must come to grips with the possibility that most of our elected representatives on the whole were against anything that had government involvement other than requiring the public finance private interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. So your solution is simply to lose, give up, and go home?
Because that's what would have happened had some of the provisions not been stripped out. The "it's that easy" nonsense is just nonsense, peddled by people who have no understanding of the politics of the situation, and would apparently rather continue to have another 20 years of unregulated insurance, pre-existing conditions, and tens of thousands of deaths a year, instead of settling for less than their ideals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. The problem is the bill we got doesn't solve any of those issues
Insurance still largely unregulated. Allowing them to retain their anti-trust exemption clearly illustrates that no serious effort at regulation is in the cards.

Pre-existing conditions-We'll get part of the way, people with significant resources will no longer be denied access but low and average income people will never be able to pay the ransom and certainly won't have money for care.

Tens of thousands of deaths-If people can't pay for care then they will continue to die. Since profitcare will be shifting more weight to the consumer then probably even more will slip through the cracks and more suffering and death will ensue.

Profitcare has no shot at surviving another 20 years without government intervention and mandating we take their crap. The rich alone won't justify their existence.

This health care reform bill is the ultimate in not doing something and saying you did, except the money gets spent. Now, of course we can blame the dying sick for not making proper use of the provided bootstraps and they are off the collective conscience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tashca Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. K&R
Yup.....I agree. It's just as simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC