Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't ask, don't call home - - fiercely serving the US while gay & afraid to write home

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:27 PM
Original message
Don't ask, don't call home - - fiercely serving the US while gay & afraid to write home
Washington (CNN) -- There's a constant fear that hangs over some service members deployed to a war zone -- and it's not necessarily the threat from insurgents or roadside bombs.

One Marine serving in Afghanistan said suppressing the truth about his sexual orientation is gut-wrenching.

"I do worry a lot about being outed and kicked out," he said in an e-mail to CNN. "So far the military has been my livelihood and my source of work/income for the past six years. I don't want that all taken away from me and me being discharged anything but honorably."

The Marine requested anonymity because of the military's 1993 congressionally mandated "don't ask, don't tell" law prohibiting gay, lesbian and bisexual service members from coming out...

" all the time, especially on the phone," the Marine said. "If I call with him, it's brief and just yes/no answers. When I am on Facebook, I'll view my gay friends' pages but most of them are supporters and have a lot of don't ask, don't tell headlines so I quickly scroll or minimize the page in case anyone next to me happens to peep."

Even in his e-mail correspondence to CNN, the Marine said that he was using an extra small font in case someone peeking over his shoulder could see the words on the screen.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/12/23/gay.military.communication/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. K and R
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. I left the navy after 10 years because I got tired of being
Edited on Mon Dec-28-09 06:54 PM by jonnyblitz
paranoid that i would get caught. I figured it was only a matter of time because i was getting up in rank and more noticed, particularly when most others of my rank where married with children and I didn't even have a girlfriend. People always "asked" nosey questions about ones personal life. It is a bizarre situation and feeling to be "illegal" based on orientation. Never fucking again.

On occasion I chat on yahoo with a closeted late 20's gay army captain who is presently in Kabul and we only discuss superficial stuff for fear of what is mentioned in the article. He was deployed to Iraq twice before that and i have been talking to him since about 2004 or 2005 when he responded to a profile I had on a gay "social" site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I look for the day
when service to country doesn't consider orientation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. while I was in most people who i confided in (which was always
a risk) didn't give a shit, ESPECIALLY since I told them after they knew me well. Some serious bonding goes on between service members stationed together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I'm a straight female and I got investigated by NIS for being gay.
Apparently, I wasn't responding with appropriate enthusiasm to some of the lunkheads who were hitting on me. Oh, and I had a short haircut. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Another good reason to end DADT: Straight women can say "no" without being investigated.
And "lunkheads" is a nice term for some of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. dont ask dont tell - his xmas president from obama and the dems nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. So fucking ridiculous. This could be ended today.
Except it would take political courage. Nevermind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. I know! We'll just get our "fierce advocate" in the White House to end it with

his signature on an Executive Order. Unless of course he's busy praying and singing with Donnie McClosetcase and Pastor Purpose Driven Homophobe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. One word from the Commander-In-Chief
is all it would take.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, not exactly. It would take one word
plus actually giving a shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I was trying to avoid charges of
"hate."

But I do wonder who he's caving to. I really believe he would change the policy if there were not something he fears in response.

Regardless, the president I thought I voted for would have done it by now.

I'm afraid he's courting the Center.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. No it would not. Changing the law requires an act of Congress.
Please do some research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Actually, you are correct
"Don't ask, don't tell" is a policy, not law. But the policy was Clinton's way of implementing the Military Personnel Eligibility Act of 1993. So, it would take no more than a word from Obama to reverse the policy, but more than a word to get the federal law repealed.

However, it seems to me that by eliminating the policy, and using his authority as Commander-In-Chief to prioritize enforcement of this federal law in the military under his ultimate command according to seriousness of the offense, I believe Obama could made a much better fight of it than he has.

All that said, I don't understand why any GLBT person would serve in the military of a nation that doesn't treat them equally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Sort of.
"Don't ask, don't tell" was the Clinton compromise to try and moderate the existing policy, which was that any servicemember could be directly asked if they were gay and prosecuted if they lied. The original intent of DADT--which originally "don't ask, don't tell, don't pursue, don't harass"--was that sexual orientation should be ignored so long as no one else brought it up. (Obviously that backfired, and there have actually been more discharges under DADT than under the old policy, but that's beside the point.)

The sticking issue is that whatever the announced policy of the White House, Pentagon, etcetera, the government is still bound by the Military Personnel Eligibility Act of 1993, which explicitly says that anyone who "demonstrate(s) a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts" is basically unfit for military service, making it possible to toss them out. In other words, anything short of a new federal law is simply lip service, and to get anything more fair than the original principle of DADT (which obviously doesn't work) we're going to need to scrap that law. Currently that's slated to be a part of the 2011 Defense Authorization Act, which will be passing through Congress in 2010. Exactly what time next year is unknown, but I suspect it will be earlier rather than later. So within 12 months, this conversation should all be moot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I think if I were a leader in the GLBT community, I might
announce a specific and reasonable date, upon which I wound ask all GLBT members of the service to tell if DADT is still in effect.

We'd see how that affects operational readiness.

I have a relative who left the service because of DADT. I'm ashamed of the policy (and the law).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R. What a inhumane and wicked policy this is.
I can not believe that we have a Democrat in the White House that turns his head away to such injustice and cruelty.

But then, as Bill Moyers said, we hae a Nobel Peace Prize winning President who refuses to sign the international ban of land mines.

Thanks for posting this story, BlueBear.

Real lives. Real hurt. Real injustice. And we don't need to leave the United States to find it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes, actually similar
to the prejudice that homeless people face.

And, among "progressives" to boot.

Too bad there isn't real support from one group to another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. In your honor . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Awww..... sorry I didn't catch this earlier!
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 09:59 PM by bobbolink
thank you soooo much!

I'm at a place where I feel like it's hopeless to try to work for more humane treatment of ALL humans.... it seems like we are determined as a species to make life miserable for each other. :cry:

Here's a bear hug---:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R. History repeats itself once again.
Like the American citizens of color who fought courageously for this country in a segregated military only to come home to more of the same, gay and lesbian servicepeople are asked to fight for their second-class status. Despicable beyond words.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. k&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-28-09 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
20. I can't imagine serving in a war and not being able to draw on support from home.
:( The time to end this is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. Kicking this up again.
Real lives. Real hurt. Real injustice. Right here in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreeState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-29-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. Error: you can only recommend threads which were started in the past 24 hours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC