Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:31 PM
Original message |
TSA announces all underwear to be worn outside pants from now on. nt. |
StarfarerBill
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Whew; I'm covered, then. |
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:34 PM
Response to Original message |
2. What if one tends to not wear underwear? |
|
Not me, naturally. Just a general question.
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Then they will give you really ugly standard issue ones to put on. |
|
Not 'you' of course, just generally.
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
15. What if the passenger is too large to wear them? Will they have to wear two pair? |
|
Two pair...is that four underwears?
I'm confused.
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. I'm confused. The thong fit under the pants, how does it now not fit over them? |
|
Those are awful thick pants. Or perhaps it is sudden water bloat. That could happen. Especially in the last hour of the flight.
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
23. What about the kids? You know they wear their pants baggy, below their butts. |
|
With their drawers showing. Will they have to hike up their pants and keep their now outer underwear all low and baggy? Like a reverse effect.
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. Could be a series problem. |
|
But yes, I think that they will have to wear their boxers around their knees and their pants up at old man height.
|
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
25. The bigger issue is going to be the infants with diapers outside their Garanimals. |
|
How the hell is that going to work?
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
27. 'bigger issue' snort! |
Peacetrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Now that is good... laughing my head off.. |
snot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Flying could get funnier.
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. The women will have to put their panties on their heads. |
icymist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
5. But then your outside pants would be your underwear! |
|
This is nothing more than declaring war on a tactic of how we wear clothes!
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. It is a pretzle inside a pickle. |
|
The line could go on forever.
|
timeforpeace
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. me too... a real lol. nt |
tigereye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Lord, it's crazy how one event becomes an endless generalization |
|
Edited on Tue Dec-29-09 10:39 PM by tigereye
to wit : the shoe guy - so now everyone has to take off their shoes
the liquid guys - so now no one can have any large bottles of liquids
now the underwear guy... recipe for bureaucratic wedgies?
I think the over-generalization is just absurd. It's like a form of insanity...
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Everyone under sixteen . . . is now sixteen. |
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:39 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Do they have to be clean? nt |
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
16. Your mother says yes. |
varelse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
14. You can be arrested for dressing like that in some states |
Canuckistanian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Is the underwear mandatory? |
|
I always go commando in memory of my combat duty in Thailand.
Although I hear the feel of the new Calvin Klein gotchies are to die for .
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. Yes. See up thread. The Maitrdi has extra house granny panties for you. |
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:47 PM
Response to Original message |
19. What does Underpants have to say about this? |
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
28. crap was Underpants thrown outta here too? |
Contrary1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
38. Nope, Undies still posting as of yesterday: |
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
22. Hmm. I haven't seen underpants lately. |
azul
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Dec-29-09 11:21 PM
Response to Original message |
26. That ain't the worst of it yet. |
|
When I saw the computer-generated animation on the news this morning of some dummy terriorist that had hidden something up his butt, I told my spouse, that's it, I'm not flying no more.
Shoe-bomber, we got shoe searches. Butt-bomber, nuh-uh, that's it!
|
Danascot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
will the GOP support airport colonoscopies to increase airport security or oppose them because it's a slippery scope from there to socialized healthcare?
|
Q3JR4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 01:11 AM
Response to Original message |
29. What if I don't wear underwear? |
grahamhgreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 02:14 AM
Response to Original message |
Greyhound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 02:24 AM
Response to Original message |
tk2kewl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
Beausoleil
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #32 |
37. no, all children under 16 years old are now... 16 years old! n/t |
NoPasaran
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 02:12 PM
Response to Original message |
34. Also, all in-flight announcements will be made in Swedish |
dysfunctional press
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message |
35. well that's just...bananas. |
Overseas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message |
36. TSA announces outsourcing baggage inspection to China. |
|
To please Jim DeMint who thinks unionization of baggage inspectors would be the most dangerous threat to our national security.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:30 PM
Response to Original message |