Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Underwear Bomber=Obama NOT Keeping US Safe-THEN-Shoe Bomber=Bush Did NOT Keep Us Safe After 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 10:14 AM
Original message
If Underwear Bomber=Obama NOT Keeping US Safe-THEN-Shoe Bomber=Bush Did NOT Keep Us Safe After 9/11
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 10:25 AM by kpete
If Underwear Bomb=Obama NOT Keeping US Safe-then-Shoe Bomb=Bush Did NOT Keep Us Safe After 9/11

Does.Not.Compute.

If an underwear bomb means we're not safe under Obama, does a shoe bomb mean Bush didn't really keep us safe after 9/11?

CHENEY:

"As I've watched the events of the last few days it is clear once again that President Obama is trying to pretend we are not at war. He seems to think if he has a low key response to an attempt to blow up an airliner and kill hundreds of people, we won't be at war. He seems to think if he gives terrorists the rights of Americans, lets them lawyer up and reads them their Miranda rights, we won't be at war. He seems to think if we bring the mastermind of 9/11 to New York, give him a lawyer and trial in civilian court, we won't be at war.

"He seems to think if he closes Guantanamo and releases the hard-core al Qaeda trained terrorists still there, we won't be at war. He seems to think if he gets rid of the words, 'war on terror,' we won't be at war. But we are at war and when President Obama pretends we aren't, it makes us less safe. Why doesn't he want to admit we're at war? It doesn't fit with the view of the world he brought with him to the Oval Office. It doesn't fit with what seems to be the goal of his presidency - social transformation -- the restructuring of American society. President Obama's first object and his highest responsibility must be to defend us against an enemy that knows we are at war."

http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/12/cheney-on-flight-253-obama-trying-to-pretend-we-are-not-at-war.php?ref=fpblg

....................

As for who released the "hard-core al Qaeda trained terrorists" behind this particular terrorist attack,
Dick Cheney has nothing to say. Let's remind him:



Two al Qaeda Leaders Behind Northwest Flight 253 Terror Plot Were Released by U.S.

Former Guantanamo Prisoners Believed Behind Northwest Airlines Bomb Plot;
Sent to Saudi Arabia in 2007


http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/men-believed-northwest-airlines-plot-set-free/story?id=9434065

Shoe bomber' used same explosive
Tuesday, December 29, 2009

Read more: http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=2386882#ixzz0bBZh1jL0

Bush Waited Six Days To Discuss Shoe Bomber With No GOP Complaints
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/29/bush-waited-nine-days-to_n_406307.html

....................

Here's my prize for the day. Who can be the first to get an answer out of Hoekstra, King, Ridge et al. about why they're saying the Xmas bomber needs a military trial when they supported a regular trial for the "shoe bomber". We don't get many examples in politics where a perfect apples to apples comparison demonstrably shows a series of politicians as complete hypocrites and fibbers. Not that we don't see that a lot, but seldom is it quite this straightforward. I'm going to put some reporters on it up here. But others must be asking too, right? When you see someone's got an answer, please let us know.

more:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/12/cheney_3.php?ref=fpblg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess I am wondering- How are we "not safe"?
Who got hurt other than the Fruit of the Boom guy? So Obama isn't keeping the terrorists safe from themselves? Someone should ask the righties about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. negative scenarios only apply to democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danascot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Exactly, plus everyone knows Bush inherited the shoe bomber from Clinton
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. How about 9/11 = ultimate FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. All that has to happen is for one commentator to ask the republicans
"How come the republicans did not do the job of keeping us safe. If you had then we wouldn't have to be taking more stringent measures to protect us from would be bombers. What did you as a majority in congress and the bush administration do to prevent these type of things from happening?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Excellent post! k&r
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. It'll depend on the investigation
This looks like a screw up on the part of airport personnel in other countries. I'll be interested to see if there have been any relaxing of security rules in the past few months that created an environment of laxness. If so, look for the rules to snap back to post 9/11 level and even moreso.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. 911 was LIHOP or MIHOP. Until * & Cheney are sent to the Hague for their crimes
and the truth about 911 comes out, expect more of this underwear style terrorism. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC