Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich to Investigate Fannie/Freddie Bailout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:14 AM
Original message
Kucinich to Investigate Fannie/Freddie Bailout
Glad to see this isn't falling down the rabbit hole, in spite of MSM's yawning halitosis.



From Jane Hamsher at FDL:


If the White House thought they could slip the bailout of Fannie and Freddie through by announcing it in a Christmas eve news dump, think again.

Dennis Kucinich just released this statement:

As Chairman of the Domestic Policy Subcommittee of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, I’m announcing that the Subcommittee will launch an investigation into the Treasury Department’s recent decision to lift the current $400-billion cap on combined federal assistance to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, opening the way for additional, unlimited funds through the end of 2012. This investigation will include the role played by Fannie Mae chief executive Michael J. Williams and Freddie Mac chief executive Charles E. Haldeman in the decision, if any, and will seek to ensure that the additional assistance is used for homeowners and not Wall Street.

Many questions remain unanswered regarding this move by the Treasury. Why suddenly remove the cap? Indications are that Freddie and Fannie, even as millions of Americans lose their homes, have used just $111 billion of the $400 billion previously available to them. Is lifting the cap on assistance a back-door TARP?

Additionally, I want to determine whether Fannie and Freddie have a cohesive plan to buy up the under-performing mortgages that remain on the books of the big banks, at appropriate prices, and undertake a massive reworking of the terms of the mortgages so as to stem the foreclosure crisis that continues to plague our country.This new authority must be used responsibly and for the benefit of American families. This cannot be used simply to purchase toxic assets at inflated prices, thus transferring the losses to the U. S. taxpayers and acting as a back-door TARP.




On Christmas Eve they also announced $4-$6 million compensation packages for their top executives. But in they’ll start foreclosing on homeowners again in January.

Fannie and Freddie have been corrupt cesspools for years, a place where Presidents of both parties parked friends like Dennis DeConcini and Rahm Emanuel for lucrative spots on the Board of Directors as political payoff. As government sponsored entities (GSEs) selling shares to the public, they operate like hedge funds that socialize losses and privatize profits. From the LA Times last year:

This week…news broke that until August, the lobbying firm owned by McCain campaign manager Rick Davis was paid $15,000 a month by Freddie Mac, one of the mortgage giants implicated in the current crisis (now taken over by the government and under investigation by the FBI). Apparently, Freddie Mac’s plan was to gain influence with McCain’s campaign in hopes that he would help shield it from pesky government regulations.


It appears they kept looking. The Democrats have been too intimidated by leadership to start looking into the utter corruption at these entities, but Kucinich just doesn’t care.

We’ve started a fundraising page at ActBlue to thank Dennis for taking this bold step, and doing it quickly. It takes a lot of courage to stand up to leadership, the White House and the banks like that. GSEs are going to be much in the news in the upcoming year and he is announcing that he will be setting the agenda, not standing on the sidelines for a coverup.

We’ d like to get 100 donors to say “thank you” to Dennis, even if it’s only $5, so he knows it matters to the people who are watching.

Donate to Dennis Kucinich





Christmas Eve data dump


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Figures Hamsher would jump on this. Krugman
And the administration very much wants to keep this kind of intervention going. You can argue that some other policy — inflation targeting by the Fed, expanded fiscal stimulus, whatever — would be better. But none of these things seem politically possible. Keeping Fannie and Freddie fully engaged in the mortgage-support business is one of the few tools available to prop up a still very weak economy. And so they’re doing it.

link


This is on par with investigating Obama's czars.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuckleB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Go Dennis!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thank goodness.
When Kucinich picks up a cause, you know it's going nowhere.

Not surprised he's picked up Hamsher's banner and is siding with the likes of Norquist. He's always been conservative at heart... anti-abortion before he was pro-choice, changed just in time for the 2008 election and then asking Ron Paul to be his running mate. Yep, Hamsher and Kucinich belong together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thank goodness you're so transparent..
"He's (Kucinich) always been conservative at heart."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. You deny he was anti-choice and wanted Ron Paul as a running mate?
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 11:35 AM by berni_mccoy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
20. Attack what Dennis has to say
Don't attack Dennis himself or his motivations. You are engaging in some serious logical fallacies here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. When he works with the likes of Norquist, nothing he can say is worth listening to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. He is engaging in his duties as a congressman
Unless you have proof of wrong doing from Dennis, I respectfully ask you to attack the assertions being made not the parties involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. wow -- you REALLY overdosed on the koolaid if you think Dennis is a CONSERVATIVE!
Hope your people do an intervention soon :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Wow you've really gone off the deep end your blind loyalty haven't you?
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 11:34 AM by earth mom
Well you can stick it where the sun don't shine because Kuninich actually cares about this country, it's people AND The Constitution.

Which is more than can be said about your do nothing hero. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. Actually it's nuts like Kucinich and Hamsher who've gone off the deep end working with Norquist
And it's a long line of trends for Kucinich... anti-choice, Ron Paul and now Norquist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starbucks Anarchist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
34. But blind loyalty to Kucinich is okay?
:rofl:

I like both Kucinich and Obama (!), but I'm not blindly loyal to either one of them, or anybody else, for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Delusional. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. Done. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. From what I'm reading Fannie and Freddie have become Money Laundering operations nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Link? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You don't like the guy I'm reading
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Made it up, huh? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Nope we've had this fight before
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 11:39 AM by AllentownJake
and you will attack the authors not the content of what they are saying, even though the last politician one of the authors endorsed was Senator Barack Obama of Illinois for President.

So I'm not going to play the game with you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. link it anyways.
please :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I'll P-M you
I have no desire to reopen a debate with these authors with Pro and the attacks on me personally that will sure to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. Go Dennis!!!
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
12. Bloodsuckers, all of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. More of Kucinich's statement
LINK


December 29, 2009



.....

As a result of a curiously-timed Christmas Eve announcement by the Treasury Department, the mortgage giants will have access to unlimited funds without having to come back to Congress. Since the federal government is the majority owner of both companies, their operations will remain under Administration control.

This relationship between Treasury and Fannie and Freddie bears inspection, particularly in the wake of reports that the mortgage giants' chief executives will now receive $900,000 each in annual compensation, bonuses of up to $6 million each, and an additional $42 million in special compensation will be spread among a dozen other executives.




The calculated end-run by the administration around Congressional approval for this latest bailout is most distressing, because of the acutely uncomfortable implications.


God knows what people will do when they start hearing about it.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. Thanks for posting! K&R for DK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don Caballero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
18. He is so annoying
and a contrarian. He needs to work with the Party not against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. He annoys you? Good...
he's on the right track...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. The party is a tool for a goal
not the goal itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. a good sign
I suppose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. Lockstep, dammit Dennis!
Obey!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. KR+10
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
35. This is just unreal.
I believe what Dennis is acting appropriately in his role and is providing Congressional Oversight. I wish we had done a better job of that during the Bush administration. As much as I support Obama, I can't view Dennis' actions as a personal attack on him or his COS.

To set Dennis and Obama up as adversaries and to pretend that we need to be on one side or the other is just ...

unreal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC