Robyn66
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:18 AM
Original message |
I was denied coverage for a pre-existing condition today |
|
Well I signed my family up for AFLAC supplamental insurance today. Something I wish I had last year when I was batteling breast cancer. I also found out, that the only thing that I can be covered for is "accident insurance" not the "hospitalization" or their "cancer" insurance because of my pre existing condition even though I finished treatment in March of 09. I have to wait 5 years.
I can understand having to wait for the cancer insurance but since you can be hospitalized for more things than cancer I find that a bit wierd. But anyway. Just more fun in the sun!
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Your example is the reason that the house and senate version have to allow pre-existing conditions |
|
to be covered immediately, not 5 years from now
|
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message |
|
That will solve your problems!
:sarcasm:
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. The OP NEVER even implied that, and even with your sarcasm, the fact remains that |
|
allowing pre-existing conditions not to take effect for 5 years for adults will hurt a lot of people
|
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. I never suggested they did. I'm simply pointing out that killing the bill will hurt the OP. |
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
11. You are correct, sorry, I misinterpreted /nt |
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
17. The bills had provisions for allowing interim government insurance for those |
|
with preexisting conditions until the bans kicked in.
|
unc70
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. No, but the bill might make the problems even worse |
|
My entire group plan was canceled by insurance company, leaving me in roughly the same problem.
Depending on just what makes it into the final bill, things might actually get even worse for those of us of a certain age with pre-existing conditions.
|
still_one
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. The insurance company canceled your companies group plan? /nt |
Catshrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. That happened to my sister when her insurance co went bankrupt. |
|
She had a preexisting condition and couldn't get any kind of insurance. But dammit, keep government out of my health care, she says. I say what health care? She is a Rushbot, Beckerhead, Hannitized example of a RWer if there ever was one -- even though it's against her own best interests. It doesn't make sense to me but who needs logic when we have Rush to think for us, eh?
|
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Should tell her she doesn't have to worry about the govt getting involved in her health care. |
Bluenorthwest
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. This is your response to a cancer survior with a good point to |
|
make? The OP told a story. Dripping sarcasm is an interesting take for you, who have used personal heart string tales of Insurance to make your points. What do you hope to achieve with such farting in church, your two rule books, and 'emoticons'? What do you get out of such a statement? The OP did not even say anything like what you imply was said.
|
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I have two children with type-1 diabetes... I'm WITH the OP on this. And against the KTBers. |
Jim__
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |
|
We all have to fight for decent, accessible health care in this country.
|
Boudica the Lyoness
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
9. You can understand having to wait for cancer insurance! |
Robyn66
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
I just understand their reasoning :/
|
old mark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Join the club. I had bypass surgery in 2003, found NO ONE will insure |
|
people who have had such surgery except Blue Cross, who offerred lousy coverage at $800 a month, just for me.
I have since found excellent coverage sponsered by the state of PA,for a little over 1/4th of that. Welcome.
mark
|
stopbush
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
12. My wife may be in a similar situation. |
|
We have been off insurance for 6 months and are starting 1/1/10 on a plan through her job. We just got the policy booklet yesterday. Under pre-existing conditions, it says that any condition that we may have had in the six months prior to the plan's start date that we saw a doctor about will be considered a pre-existing, not-covered condition for the first 12 months we are on the plan. My wife had cancer surgery back in 2005. She has had follow up tests since her original chemo & radiation, but has not had any treatments. Looking back on last year, I see that she had a routine 6-month visit to her oncologist in August. I guess that means her oncologist (or any oncologist) won't be covered on this new plan for 12 months. I also assume any treatments, medications or therapies she receives that are related to oncology will also not be covered for 12 months.
Now, if she had skipped the appointment in August - ie: not had her routine check-up - I'm guessing her new plan would cover her oncology from Day One.
Nice, eh?
|
roguevalley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Robyn66, I hug you. Stories like yours make me sick. I wish you well |
|
and maybe someday when we become a good country again, you will get justice.
|
REP
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 07:49 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Is this Long/Short-Term Disability insurance or regular health insurance? |
|
If it's disability insurance, I can see why there's a waiting period too after treatment for a serious illness.
|
Fire_Medic_Dave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Dec-30-09 10:15 PM
Response to Original message |
20. It does take 5 years with recurrence to be considered "cured". |
|
I wish you the best. Mom had a mastectomy in 1993, she has dementia now but she beat the cancer.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:32 PM
Response to Original message |