Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can Jim DeMint be prosecuted right now under PATROIT ACT?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:30 AM
Original message
Can Jim DeMint be prosecuted right now under PATROIT ACT?
That he himself signed? Hmm? Aiding and abetting a terrorist by blocking Obamas nominee for TSA?

Paybacks a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. He certainly seems to want us to have a weaker workforce inspecting the bags.
When Jim DeMint opposes unionization of baggage inspectors so intensely that he's willing to hold up appointing a well qualified chief executive for the TSA, he's really saying he'd like us to have insecure, underpaid, overworked inspectors. Seems like that kind of weakened workforce would be ripe for bribery.

I'd rather have a well-trained, well-respected, well-paid, well-rested workforce inspecting the baggage, on the alert for the one or two oddities among the thousands of bags and customers they review every single day.

Why would he prefer that they be weak and insecure?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sad that this story is not getting out; the msm is completely ignoring it.
I've traveled in other countries quite a bit and the screeners are professional, efficent, and generally pleasant.

I think the American people would prefer that the people keeping them safe be verything you describe. Good wagges and respect (and unionization) will do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. the head of the party prefers bipartisanship so let's don't point out deMint's role ok? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. That is sad because it is so illogical of DeMint. To want insecure baggage inspectors.
Maybe he wants to outsource the work to China? They could examine the bags and their workers aren't allowed to strike either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Anybody can be prosecuted under the PA and the MCA for any or no reason.
Did you miss that part?

We don't even need a charge, just declare him bad.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Even if he could be, it'll never happen, damn it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestRick Donating Member (604 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. It appears many here
assume that unionizing any sector will better it. I've hired both union and non-union workers. Just because someone is in a union doesn't make them a better or happier employee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC