Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We've got one more year to go in this Decade

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:42 PM
Original message
We've got one more year to go in this Decade
Although lots of us are ready to move on to something better (or at least different), don't forget that the decade goes from the year ending in "1" through the year ending in "10" (or zero, as the case may be.)


Just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seeinfweggos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. you are a lonely voice crying in the wilderness, my friend
you are right of course, but it matters none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. So the 80's was 1981-1990, inclusively?
Huh? wtf?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh damnit! You mean we're going to have to watch these top 10 of the decade clip shows again next yr
Why can't we be done with this sucky decade already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. So, what decade does the year 2000 belong to? n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. 90s according to this, I think
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. And therefore, 2000 was not the turn of the millenium. Makes perfect sense! ;-) n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Of course it wasn't. Rather, 2000 was the turn of America to the far right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groovedaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. No doubt! n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. i see it as 3 more years left in this decade...
my counting starts from the year i was born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. 8 more years...i don't count the cheney years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. disagree.
disagreed with the "2000 is actually part of the 1990s" crowd as well.

2010 starts the next decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. So then, please remind us which of the previous 200 decades had only 9 years.
I'm afraid that's the only way it would work out the way you say it should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. 2000 - 2009 is ten years.
1. 2000
2. 2001
3. 2002
4. 2003
5. 2004
6. 2005
7. 2006
8. 2007
9. 2008
10. 2009

that's the way it's going to be measured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Systematic Chaos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. So then the first decade was ten years too:
1. 0
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. 9

That being said, can you name any major historical events from Year Zero?

What, you mean there WAS no Year Zero, thereby making the very first decade of the A.D. calendar equal to:

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. 6
7. 7
8. 8
9. 9
10. 10?

Oops!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endless october Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. there was a year zero. if they mislabled it, should we have to pay?
i say no. those people didn't even have internet message boards, so who would have been around to tell them they were wrong?

2010 is our new decade. if you want to wait until 2011 to acknowledge the new decade, more power to you, but the champagne is apt to be mighty flat by then.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. 2000 was the last year of the 20th Century.
If you count on your fingers, the first is "one" and the last is "ten." "Eleven" starts the next group of fingers, or years.

It's no biggie, other than our culture is so very challenged in understanding math, or science, or many other areas, that we tend not to think things through that ARE important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. Posts like this make a compelling case for naming this
the decade of anal-retentiveness. And FWIW, the decade ends when WE say it ends - just like the century or the millennium. See Seinfeld for a full explanation of why celebrating the new millennium on Dec. 31st, 2000, would have been incredibly lame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well, there's my point. Instead of wrestling between Ptolemy and Copernicus,
we're looking to Seinfeld for these cultural amd scientific markers. It's just a Sein of the times, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. If it is true that a decade is ten years, could not a decade begin in
a year such as 1997 and end ten years later?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadEyeDyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
20. we count decades differently than centuries
there was not a year zero so centuries run inclusively for 100 years. Decades are a collection of 10 (deca) years. We generally name them by our base ten system. I.e. 50's, 60's, 70's etc. 1/1/2010 will start a new decade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. Don't waste your breath...
Edited on Wed Dec-30-09 03:43 PM by Javaman
there are people who enjoy willful ignorance in all matters including logic here on DU.

I met a guy years ago, that firmly believed he was 1 on the day he was born. Go figure.

There is no reasoning with teh stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
22. *astronomy nerd alert*
the planet is over 4 billion years old.

Still looks pretty hawt, too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-30-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
23. By that logic, I was 'born' 1 year after I left my mothers womb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC