Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Northwest Flight 253 intelligence failure: Negligence or conspiracy?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:22 AM
Original message
The Northwest Flight 253 intelligence failure: Negligence or conspiracy?
The article, from the WSWS makes a good case for considering who would benefit from not connecting the dots in this incident. Just as it would be naive to believe there are conspiracies at every turn (never assume conspiracy for what can be explained by incompetence, someone once said), it would be equally naive to believe that those with the power to push the government to the right and to increasingly militarize this country would never ever do so if an opportunity presented itself. The article isn't so much a brief for conspiracy as it is for viewing events with an open mind so one can gain a more accurate understanding of how the government operates.

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/dec2009/pers-d31.shtml

In the five days since the abortive attempt by the 23-year-old Nigerian student Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to detonate an explosive device onboard Northwest Flight 253, information has surfaced that indicates an ostensible breakdown in US intelligence and security that is extraordinary in both its character and scale.

Among the facts now known are the following:

• Abdulmutallab’s father, a prominent retired banker and ex-government minister, had visited the US Embassy in Abuja more than a month before the attempted bombing to warn CIA officials that his son had become involved with Al Qaeda elements in Yemen. He provided them with information with which the young man could have been located, and he followed up his visit with at least two phone calls.

• For at least four months, US intelligence had information from Yemen that Al Qaeda operatives there were preparing “a Nigerian” for a terrorist attack.

• The information from Yemen was further substantiated by the National Security Agency’s interception of communications discussing preparations for an impending attack and the use of the “Nigerian.”

<edit>

Both then and now, the government and the media expect the public to accept that all that was involved was mistakes. But why should anyone assume that the failure to act on the extensive intelligence leading to Abdulmutallab involved merely “innocent” mistakes—and not something far more sinister?

If this episode is to be examined seriously, the question must be asked: What would have happened had Northwest Flight 253 been destroyed?

There is no question but that such a catastrophe would have had immense repercussions both internationally and within the United States. It would have seriously destabilized the Obama administration, politically strengthened the most extreme right-wing sections of the ruling class, and cleared the way for an even more massive expansion of military-intelligence operations overseas and a drastic curtailing of democratic rights at home.

Even the failed attempt has touched off a firestorm of criticism by the Republican right of the Obama administration’s supposed laxity in the face of terrorism.

<edit>

This second statement—delivered just one day after Obama’s announcement that he had ordered a “thorough review” of intelligence procedures—reflects the divisions and recriminations within the Washington political establishment and the US intelligence agencies. It is indicative of the immense pressure being brought to bear on his administration, and his own recognition that a successful terrorist attack would have had a profoundly destabilizing effect on his presidency.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. WSWS is a nutcase site. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. What's the basis for that sweeping condemnation?
Of course, you're entitled to your small-minded opinion. No matter how baseless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I can see why one might disagree with the WSWS,
but it's hard for me to see why one would dismiss it as a nutcase site. How often do you visit it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's usually not a good idea to attribute to elaborate conspiracy
that which can be explained by simple negligence. Occam's Razor applies here, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
panader0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Did they ever find his penis?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, both the FBI and CIA knew about terrorist suspects in the US prior to 9/11
Why Were Hijackers Left Off the Watchlist?

A key section of the congressional report tells the puzzling story of a pair of Saudi hijackers who settled in San Diego almost two years before the attacks. Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi were two of the terrorists aboard American Airlines Flight 77, which crashed into the Pentagon. In the report�s judgment, their story represents �perhaps the intelligence community�s best chance to unravel the September 11 plot.�

The tale begins in late 1999, when counterterrorism agents working round-the-clock in preparation for the Millennium celebrations got wind that al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi, who had been connected to the 1998 East Africa bombings, were planning a trip to Malaysia. According to a CIA officer who testified to the committee, �a kind of tuning fork buzzed� when he and his colleagues heard the news. The CIA arranged for Malaysian intelligence to monitor the pair once they landed in Kuala Lumpur on January 5, 2000. Their behavior, CIA Director George Tenet testified, �was consistent with clandestine activity.�

In Kuala Lumpur, the two men attended a high-level al-Qaeda meeting at the home of Yazid Sufaat, a Malaysian chemist with ties to the bin Laden network. Photographs of the gathering were taken secretly by Malaysian intelligence and transmitted back to CIA headquarters. By that time, the CIA had obtained a copy of al-Mihdhar�s Saudi passport, giving the agency his full name, passport number, birth date and other details. The passport showed that al-Mihdhar had a visa, issued at the U.S. consulate in Jiddah, Saudi Arabia, giving him the right to enter the United States at any time until the visa expired in April 2000.

Yet no action was taken to warn U.S. customs officials. According to Tenet, �We had at that point the level of detail needed to watchlist �that is, to nominate him to State Department for refusal of entry into the US or to deny him another visa. Our officers remained focused on the surveillance operation and did not do so.


--more--
CommonDreams

It's obvious both the FBI and CIA knew these terrorists were in the US. Why didn't they take action? This would explain why Bush sat and did nothing when told by Card that the US was under attack. He knew already.

This recent incident sounds like a repeat of the 9/11 attacks and could be the shadow neo-cons who set up the first attack with Bush/Cheney complicity attempting another "catastrophic event." Who would profit from this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. LIHOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It worked once...
...why not try it again?

Sure, it could be an innocent mistake.

But seeing that we spend billions on protecting the country and have sacrificed thousands of lives in the WOT, letting this type of innocent mistake to occur and not hanging someone for it shows the system to be a failure at its core.

These are the two sides: The system is a total failure or someone intentionally screwed up.

Frankly, I have to go with someone intentionally screwing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. This poor schmuck could have been used...LOL. Who knows?...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. The REAL conspiracy is were only SLIGHTLY safer than we were on 9/11 after spending trillions....
...on fucked up wars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. So is it LIHOP or MIHOP?
Or Obama and Bush are in cahoots??

Why would anybody post this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Because they didn't have Judith Miller to tell them what to think?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC