Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

California eyeing sobriety checkpoints

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 02:24 PM
Original message
California eyeing sobriety checkpoints
California eyeing sobriety checkpoints


SACRAMENTO, Dec. 31 (UPI) -- Police in 150 California cities will begin using sobriety checkpoints in 2010 as part of an attempt to clamp down on drunken driving, state officials say.

Chris Murphy, head of the state's Office of Traffic Safety, said the planned use of sobriety checkpoints throughout the state will serve as a public relations campaign intended to deter people from driving intoxicated, The Sacramento Bee said Thursday.

"It's not about the number of arrests. It's about the deterrent effect," Murphy said.

The state's aggressive campaign against drunken driving will be funded with $8 million in funds thanks to federal grants and will leave California with the most extensive checkpoint program in the United States for 2010.

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2009/12/31/California-eyeing-sobriety-checkpoints/UPI-13361262287198/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's all about the benjamins
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. eyeing?
Shit, DUI checkpoints are a fact of life in my California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Weird. I've never been through one and it's the same county.
Do the Elk Grove cops set them up a lot? I used to work out there, but otherwise don't drive around out that direction too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I've been thru them in Los Angeles. Annoying. By the time your
car gets horned into one, it's too late to turn around. The cop comes up to your window (with kind of an attitude) asking if you been drinking. OMG. I can't think of any situation where cops preemptively ask citizens if they are committing a crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Standard "official" declination of the obvious: "It's not about the number of arrests....
... It's about the deterrent effect."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Gotta generate revenue somehow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-31-09 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. what are they serious? they're way behind the times
i don't know how long louisiana has had sobriety checkpoints but hell two decades AT LEAST

i thought cali was a big rich state, what the hell did they do w. all the money?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. PA's had them for years - they even announce them.
They don't say specifically where they will be, but they say specifically WHEN they will be. They only catch the idiots with those. Anyone who reads the paper will know to take the back roads where they can't set them up for logistical reasons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. "It's not about the number of arrests. It's about the deterrent effect"
That's because when they run a checkpoint they may get one or two low BAC DUI's but they also check license, registration, insurance, and immigration status. They also get to write equipment violation tickets and do vehicle searches.

But that's all OK because "it's a deterrent". House to house searches for child porn would be a deterrent too; how many of the checkpoint advocates would be OK with that?

Sobriety checkpoints are a "papers please" action by the police.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. When I was young and stupid,,,I drove by one drunk off my ass
but they were backed up so they just waved me on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
court jester Donating Member (232 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. If someone had told Californians in the early '70s that
by the end of the first decade of the New Millennium they would
have regular police checkpoints/roadblocks and all cigarette smoking
would be prohibited in bars...

They would have said you're a conspiracy theorist

And you wouldn't have had to mention warrantless wiretapping!

BTW, What's with this "eyeing checkpoints" like they don't exist now?
Count on the total number doubling every 9 months or so...


You know you
want to laugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
12. The State will institute sobriety checkpoints even as it sanctions and
taxes gas station quick-shops' sale of booze.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC