Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chertoff's hands in the cookie jar...what he's not mentioning...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
samplegirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:03 AM
Original message
Chertoff's hands in the cookie jar...what he's not mentioning...
Chertoff Group~~~~ his securtiy consulting agency includes client who manufactures full body scan machines.

Ex-Homeland Security chief head said to abuse public trust by touting body scanners

By Kimberly Kindy
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 1, 2010; A07



Since the attempted bombing of a U.S. airliner on Christmas Day, former Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff has given dozens of media interviews touting the need for the federal government to buy more full-body scanners for airports.

What he has made little mention of is that the Chertoff Group, his security consulting agency, includes a client that manufactures the machines. The relationship drew attention after Chertoff disclosed it on a CNN program Wednesday, in response to a question.

An airport passengers' rights group on Thursday criticized Chertoff, who left office less than a year ago, for using his former government credentials to advocate for a product that benefits his clients.

"Mr. Chertoff should not be allowed to abuse the trust the public has placed in him as a former public servant to privately gain from the sale of full-body scanners under the pretense that the scanners would have detected this particular type of explosive," said Kate Hanni, founder of FlyersRights.org, which opposes the use of the scanners.

Chertoff's advocacy for the technology dates back to his time in the Bush administration. In 2005, Homeland Security ordered the government's first batch of the scanners -- five from California-based Rapiscan Systems.

Today, 40 body scanners are in use at 19 U.S. airports. The number is expected to skyrocket at least in part because of the Christmas Day incident. The Transportation Security Administration this week said it will order 300 more machines.

In the summer, TSA purchased 150 machines from Rapiscan with $25 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds. Rapiscan was the only company that qualified for the contract because it had developed technology that performs the screening using a less-graphic body imaging system, which is also less controversial. (Since then, another company, L-3 Communications, has qualified for future contracts, but no new contracts have been awarded.)

Over the past week, Chertoff has repeatedly talked about the need for expanding the use of the technology in airports, saying it could detect bombs like the one federal authorities say Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, a 23-year-old Nigerian, carried onto the Detroit-bound aircraft.

"We could deploy the scanning machines that we currently are beginning to deploy in the U.S. that will give us the ability to see what someone has concealed underneath their clothing," Chertoff said Wednesday in an interview on CNN. The incident on the Detroit-bound plane provided "a very vivid lesson in the value of that machinery," he said.

Staff researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Disgusting.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samplegirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'm so sick of these Pigs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. there should be a special prison for those who knowingly profit off terror....the giuliani jail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhpgetsit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. I understand that Heckuva Job Brownie also holds a financial interest in this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. Business As Usual...
Most of boooshie's toadies have found nice gigs in "private industry"...making big coin for companies they once regulated. Others are lobbyists...cashing in on contacts. Many are hired to be PR shills cause they can get on the teevee and pretend to be "experts" and their conflicts are rarely brought up.

They also form the "shadow government" that is ready to be part of the next rushpublican regime :scared:

What's shameful is how these crooks and war criminals still evade scrutiny...from a gunshy Justice Department as well as a corrupted corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samplegirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. So true
your reply says it all!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WestSeattle2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is the American way. USA, Inc. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. Hand-wringing, and hardly news.
Chertoff's position on full body scanners is not remotely new. He fought the ACLU on them when he was HSS. And Chertoff Group consults about everybody.

Plenty of well-reasoned arguments against Chertoff's position, and they were made years ago. He mentioned his likely conflict of interest days ago on NPR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. This frames perfectly what the "war on terror" was all about
it was about government contractors. That's it. Nothing else. Don't believe me? Check the financial status and stock price of Halliburton pre-911 including the contingency liabilities for asbestos lawsuits that their CEO was stupid enough to involve Halliburton in. Check them now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. In fairness, when asked, he'll 'fess up.
Edited on Sat Jan-02-10 11:50 AM by LiberalAndProud

SIEGEL: In your current role as a consultant, do you have an interest in body scanners?

Mr. CHERTOFF: You know, I, to be - we consult with all kinds of firms including firms that you manufacture body scanners.

SIEGEL: You do have some interest in�

Mr. CHERTOFF: Correct. That's correct.

http://m.npr.org/news/U.S./122018593?page=1


We should be paying attention to which reporters will ask the question, do you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lxlxlxl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. If we think Stimulus $$$ Abuse > Homeland Security $$$ we are wrong
I doubt we know 10% of the waste that post 9-11 homeland security spending created. All cronyism and waste if we had any insight, and guess which senator is responsible for auditing and the committee that could provide leadership? l.i.e.b.e.r.m.a.n
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Aka Liebermole. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. Follow the money
The boys are loving the cash windfall here. Note he will be on MTP tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parker CA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh don't worry, the objective David Gregory is sure to grill him on this tomorrow. Oh, wait
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. If only we had a free press
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC