Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wal-Mart settles organizing case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 07:57 PM
Original message
Wal-Mart settles organizing case

http://www.twincities.com/business/ci_14060872

Retailer agrees to post worker rights
By Julie Forster
jforster@pioneerpress.com
Updated: 12/23/2009 10:09:16 PM CST

Wal-Mart and the union trying to organize workers in the discounter's Twin Cities area stores have reached a settlement over allegations the retailer violated federal labor laws.

The United Food and Commercial Workers Local 789 filed charges with the National Labor Relations Board last summer accusing Wal-Mart of illegal antiunion activity at the Midway store on University Avenue in St. Paul and at a store in Hastings.

The union later withdrew the Midway charges after employees declined to testify. But at the Hastings store, the board found merit to allegations that a manager threatened to fire an employee if he continued to engage in union organizing. The same manager solicited grievances from an employee with the purpose of discouraging a union, also illegal, according to the NLRB.

The National Labor Relations Act protects employees' rights to engage in union organizing activity.

In agreeing to settle the matter, Wal-Mart did not admit wrongdoing. "We simply agree with the board that it makes sense to resolve the matter," said Daphne Moore, a Wal-Mart spokeswoman.

Bentonville, Ark.-based Wal-Mart argued the employee was a supervisor and therefore was not protected by the union organizing law, said Marlin Osthus, director of the NLRB's regional office. The NLRB concluded the employee was not a supervisor and thereby protected in trying to form a union.

It's also against the law for employers to threaten workers' employment status based on union activity, and it's illegal for a supervisor or manager to interrogate or intimidate an employee about union support.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC