Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Promise Broken on a vow to end no-bid contracts

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 10:33 PM
Original message
A Promise Broken on a vow to end no-bid contracts
Source: St. Petersburg Times

It was the political equivalent of Barack Obama's eyes being too big for his stomach.

Obama's campaign pledge to require competition for all contracts over $25,000 sure sounded good, but even the most ardent watchdogs say it would be all but impossible.

Indeed, since Obama took office, none of the instructions from the White House's Office of Management and Budget -- which serves as the administration's controller -- has put any limits on the value of no-bid contracts. The guidance from the president and OMB appears to acknowledge that federal agencies may not always bid a project competitively, and instead has encouraged managers to do more to increase competition among contractors.

There is a paper trail:

Read more: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2010/jan/06/promise-broken-vow-end-no-bid-contracts/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crzyrussell Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. The government would be paralyzed if
everything over 25,000 had to go out to bid. Plus it would be costly.

It is just another case of campaign promises vs the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. fuck that noise--it's a lie and they could easily reign in spending with more competitive bidding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. They have read the entire article
it does says there is more competitive bidding, but that the specific pledge of everything above 25,000 was broken.


In a memo March 4, 2009, President Obama ordered the OMB to develop rules to "govern the appropriate use and oversight of sole-source and other types of noncompetitive contracts and to maximize the use of full and open competition and other competitive procurement processes." But no mention of any $25,000 rule.

The OMB followed up with a July 29, 2009, memo ordering agencies to cut by 10 percent the total dollars awarded via three types of so-called "risky" contracts, including no-bid or single-bid contracts. Again, nothing on a $25,000 rule.

Then, on Oct. 27, 2009, the OMB's Office of Federal Procurement issued guidelines for agencies that asked procurement officers to find more ways to use competitive contracts. But it didn't mention the $25,000 rule that candidate Obama had promised, either.

Scott Amey, an expert in government contracting and counsel for the nonprofit Project on Government Oversight, said Obama deserves credit for addressing the issue, but it's unrealistic to think he could fulfilll his promise.
(snip)
"Improving federal contracting and ensuring that our taxpayer dollars are spent well are top priorities," their e-mail said. "The President has charged federal departments and agencies with saving $40 billion annually by Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 through terminating unnecessary contracts, strengthening acquisition management, ending the overreliance on contractors, and reducing the use of high-risk contracts across government. The government’s major contracting agencies – which account for more than 98 percent of contract spending – are on track to meet this goal, identifying more than $19 billion of savings for the first year of this reform effort."

Progress? Watchdogs such as the Project on Government Oversight say yes. But that's still not fulfilling Obama's pledge to require competitive bidding for all contracts over $25,000. So we rate this one a Promise Broken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oerdin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very disappointing.
From the public option, to ending the war in Iraq, to closing Gitmo, ending don't ask don't tell, and now to ending the corruption of no bid contracts. Obama hasn't fulfilled any of his pledges. He's surrounded himself with corporatist types like, former Goldman-Sacks execs, etc... And basically given the party base the finger. Why should I volunteer my time and give my money again?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proletariatprincess Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yet another great disappointment......
and they seem to keep coming.
I had allowed myself a quickening of hope after the inauguration...that is all gone now. I never really trusted Obama and didn't vote for him (voted Nader) but I did hope he would do what he promised...or give it a good try anyway. But, as it turns out, he is worse than I thought he would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frank Cannon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. No-bid fucking contracts. What a concept.
Would you accept a "no-bid contract" to put a new roof on your house? To put a new transmission in your car?

Jesus Christ, we must be one bunch of stupid assholes to have accepted that the concept of a "no-bid" contract makes any goddam sense whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-06-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, In the "real world" we are, as a country, stupid assholes
No other conclusion has any supporting evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Not stupid, just corrupt at the management level and above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crzyrussell Donating Member (90 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
17. Let's get real,
25,000 is nothing when it comes to business or government! Many day to day repairs cost that much..

If you had any knowledge of how government operates you would probably realize this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Another promise broken......
what else is new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Yeah, throw it on the pile with the rest of them. You know, if they ran a barrel of
vanilla pudding against Obama in the primaries, I'd cast my vote for the pudding. And now we learn of $20 MILLION from the healthcare and pharmaceutical cartels. Fuck Obama. Fuck him from here to 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. BBBBBBBUUTTTTTTTTTTTT YOU MUST WANT PALIN!!?!11!!!!1!!1111
I'm fucking sick of voting for the lesser of the two evils. I feel especially dirty after I fell for most of the campaign bullshit and personality of this guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSPS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
10. It should be news only when obama KEEPS a promise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. He kept the promise to escalate the war on Afghanistan. In fact he doubled down on it.
To be honest, quite a bit more than doubled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why has no one raised the Constitutional issue that it's illegal that Bush has a 3rd term? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkohatlanta Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:52 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Honest people don't need excuses, dishonest people never run out of them.
I don't think that Archimedes would recognize Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. Can you say
Animal Farm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
15. Obama didn't vow to end them in the second he stepped into office and I can understand...
...winding them down slowly as to not break shit instead of pulling the rug out real fast.

This seems like another pony post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. The bigger question is...
.. is there any campaign promise Barry will come though on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC