|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 10:45 AM Original message |
Poll question: Do You Support Our Use of Private Security Contractors in Afghanistan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrDan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
1. a horrible policy . . . with horrible results |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 10:48 AM Response to Original message |
2. Please provide solid proof of your child recruiting accusation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 10:50 AM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Sure things, buddy: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Who exactly is the "Afghanistan Rights Monitor " |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:15 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. They are an independent Kabul-based group. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:30 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. That's isn't a whole lot of information you have provided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:39 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. What ever you need to tell yourself to keep that head buried. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Deleted sub-thread |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 04:57 PM Response to Reply #14 |
38. "The UN?! That podunk, no-name, shady organization?!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
arcadian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:51 AM Response to Reply #11 |
22. Bwahahahaha! Get real. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 04:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
32. Yes, this is like the legal cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Common Sense Party (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 12:18 PM Response to Reply #3 |
26. Just send in the UN Peacekeepers -- then THEY can rape the children |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:42 AM Response to Reply #2 |
17. You are unfuckingbelieveable! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:45 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. LOL! I think you comments make you look pretty bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:50 AM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Deleted sub-thread |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 12:04 PM Response to Reply #20 |
24. Deleted message |
spoony (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 12:36 PM Response to Reply #20 |
27. So does your inability to handle people who disagree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ixion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 10:51 AM Response to Original message |
4. I don't support anything military (or para or quasi military) in Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
7. Sure! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:20 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. They make much more than our military and don't follow the same |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gratuitous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 01:13 PM Response to Reply #9 |
29. What? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
8. Wow, 2 voted yes. Care to defend that position? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tailormyst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:43 AM Response to Reply #8 |
18. They will spin and spin and spin. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
invictus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
10. No, I don't support using mercenaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nyc 4 Biden (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:32 AM Response to Original message |
12. You thought you hated Blackwater before... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conscious evolution (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
13. I do not support the use of SchutzStaffel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
15. 4 mercenary supporters, yet not a single defense. Cowards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proud2BlibKansan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
16. Hell no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
independentpiney (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 11:57 AM Response to Original message |
23. Absolutely not- no mercenaries nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting (208 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
25. Absolutely not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xiamiam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
28. very surprised to see anyone here supporting private mercenaries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 04:17 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. 8%, yet no one has offered a defense of claimed support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 04:55 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Well of COURSE not. Because it's indefensible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
31. I don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 04:48 PM Response to Original message |
33. No. The individual contractors might be really great people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
34. Hell no, that is the job of the United States Marine Corps, if they won't do it they should disband. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
35. I don't support the use of private mercenary armies ANYWHERE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Caliman73 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
37. No contractors, no mercenaries. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truth2power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
39. No. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
40. I almost accidentally voted yes, because it was second instead of first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
41. Mercenaries are a threat to Democracy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 05:21 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. They have an incentive to maintain a terrified and unstable environment: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
butterfly77 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jan-07-10 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
43. Never did and.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:00 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC