Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cancer–The Deadly Legacy of the Invasion of Iraq: PROTEST to Stop these War Crimes!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 02:28 PM
Original message
Cancer–The Deadly Legacy of the Invasion of Iraq: PROTEST to Stop these War Crimes!
Forget about oil, occupation, terrorism or even Al Qaeda. The real hazard for Iraqis these days is cancer. Cancer is spreading like wildfire in Iraq. Thousands of infants are being born with deformities. Doctors say they are struggling to cope with the rise of cancer and birth defects, especially in cities subjected to heavy American and British bombardment.

Here are a few examples. In Falluja, which was heavily bombarded by the US in 2004, as many as 25% of new- born infants have serious abnormalities, including congenital anomalies, brain tumors, and neural tube defects in the spinal cord.

The cancer rate in the province of Babil, south of Baghdad has risen from 500 diagnosed cases in 2004 to 9,082 in 2009 according to Al Jazeera English....

Iraqi doctors say cancer cases increased after both the 1991 war and the 2003 invasion.
Abdulhaq Al-Ani, author of "Uranium in Iraq" told Al Jazeera English that the incubation period for depleted uranium is five to six years, which is consistent with the spike in cancer rates in 1996-1997 and 2008-2009.

There are also similar patterns of birth defects among Iraqi and Afghan infants who were also born in areas that were subjected to depleted uranium bombardment....

Many US soldiers are now referring to Gulf War Syndrome #2 and alleging they have developed cancer because of exposure to depleted uranium in Iraq.

But soldiers can end their exposure to depleted uranium when their service in Iraq ends. Iraqi civilians have nowhere else to go. The water, soil and air in large areas of Iraq, including Baghdad, are contaminated with depleted uranium that has a radioactive half-life of 4.5 billion years.
http://news.newamericamedia.org/news/view_article.html?article_id=80e260b3839daf2084fdeb0965ad31ab


If the Government is serious about ending terroism, we need to stop using Depleted Uranium now, end these wars and send doctors,nurses and supplies over to help alleviate some of the problems we have created. Iraqi contractors can then be paid to help clean up the Depleted Uranium.

Where is MoveOn? Where is True Majority? Where is Code Pink?(who now supports the war in Afghanistan because it 'helps' women) How can they sleep at night knowing they took million of donations from progressives and now are doing nothing to help end these atrocities?

How can a group be forming to protest teabaggers? As if that is all progressives have to do?

The only one I know still organizing useful protests is Cindy Sheehan. Apparently as many Duers have been bashing her all to hell, she is the only one that actually believed in what she was doing. The rest were just collecting donations. If anyone is still interested in ending these wars, there is a protest of the CIA using drones in January"

CIA Drone Protest in Langley, Virginia, scheduled for Jan. 16, 2010

and another beginning in March- stay as long as it takes to make the politicians listen to us!

Camp-In Protest Begins in DC March 13


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Code Pink does not support the war in Afghanistan
Here is a link to their site that expresses clear opposition to the Afghanistan War: http://www.codepink4peace.org/article.php?list=type&type=400

I appreciate you posting about the protests that you are endorsing because they are very important, but please don't post baseless attacks against other activists who are also doing important work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 'Code Pink' rethinks its call for Afghanistan pullout
Rethinking their position

Code Pink, founded in 2002 to oppose the US invasion of Iraq, is one of the more high-profile women's antiwar groups being forced to rethink its position as Afghan women explain theirs: Without international troops, they say, armed groups could return with a vengeance – and that would leave women most vulnerable.

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2009/1006/p06s10-wosc.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Nowhere in that article does it say they "support the war in Afghanistan"
Edited on Thu Jan-07-10 03:40 PM by Bjorn Against
In fact it says "the group hasn't dropped its call for a pullout", they are still demanding an exit strategy the only thing they were rethinking was the exact timetable for the withdrawal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. okay I mispoke
They support the troops staying which to me is the same damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No they don't support the troops staying
Read the article again it clearly says "the group hasn't dropped its call for a pullout".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. they are now flexible on the timeline for the troops leaving
call it what you will, they changed their stance. I don't believe that any woman feels safer with our troops there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Being "flexible" does not mean they want to stay in Afghanistan.
They are calling for an exit strategy out of Afghanistan, that is not a change in their stance. The only change they suggested is that they may be willing to accept some flexibility in the timeline for withdrawal, but they want a clear exit strategy established and they still want the troops out of there quickly. To take a single article that suggests a willingness to compromise is hardly an indication of a sudden shift in Code Pink's mission, they still oppose the war in Afghanistan and I can guarantee you they are going to continue to be out in the streets and getting arrested until this war comes to an end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Since when have the corporatists here done anything but TRASH Code Pink?"
Oh that's right, when they concur with this Administration's shameless WARMONGERING. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. I suspect Depleted Uranium projectiles is to blame for a lot of it.
its sickening what we've done to those innocent people. No threat to us whatsoever. Their only mistake was sitting over dick cheney's oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I can't even look at the pictures of the babies anymore
I googled the images for a nurse friend who wouldn't believe me....just beyond horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. I'm in the same boat
There is no excuse for any of this. The perpetrators should be in jail right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks for posting this. Question: do we have permits?
I will do my best regardless to attend both protests. :thumbsup: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happy_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thank you!
:applause:

(not sure about the permits)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC