Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On Geithner, the Republicans are really going to be disappointed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:47 PM
Original message
On Geithner, the Republicans are really going to be disappointed
AIG said in a draft of a regulatory filing that the insurer paid banks, which included Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Societe Generale SA, 100 cents on the dollar for credit-default swaps they bought from the firm. The New York Fed crossed out the reference, according to the e-mails, and AIG excluded the language when the filing was made public on Dec. 24, 2008. The e-mails were obtained by Representative Darrell Issa, ranking member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The New York Fed took over negotiations between AIG and the banks in November 2008 as losses on the swaps, which were contracts tied to subprime home loans, threatened to swamp the insurer weeks after its taxpayer-funded rescue. The regulator decided that Goldman Sachs and more than a dozen banks would be fully repaid for $62.1 billion of the swaps, prompting lawmakers to call the AIG rescue a “backdoor bailout” of financial firms.

“It appears that the New York Fed deliberately pressured AIG to restrict and delay the disclosure of important information,” said Issa, a California Republican. Taxpayers “deserve full and complete disclosure under our nation’s securities laws, not the withholding of politically inconvenient information.”

‘Officially Recused’

Geithner was “officially recused from matters dealing with specific companies” at the New York Fed after his nomination for Treasury Secretary on Nov. 24, 2008, and “began to insulate himself weeks earlier in anticipation of his nomination,” said Meg Reilly, a Treasury spokeswoman. Geithner, who was tapped by President Barack Obama, took the Treasury job January, 2009. Mark Herr, a spokesman for New York-based AIG, declined to comment.

Issa requested the e-mails from AIG Chief Executive Officer Robert Benmosche in October after Bloomberg News reported that the New York Fed ordered the crippled insurer not to negotiate for discounts in settling the swaps. The decision to pay the banks in full may have cost AIG, and thus taxpayers, at least $13 billion, based on the discount the insurer was seeking.

link

This is the RW yanking people's chains again. The fact that Geithner recused himself was mentioned many times during his hearing.

Frank Says Fed’s Role in AIG Is ‘Troubling,’ Supports Hearings

January 07, 2010

By Alison Vekshin and Peter Cook

Jan. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Representative Barney Frank said the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s decision to tell American International Group Inc. to limit disclosures on payments to banks is “troubling” and said he supported holding congressional hearings on the issue.

The U.S. House of Representatives last month approved legislation that would prevent the Fed from having the power to bail out companies such as AIG in the future, Frank said today in a Bloomberg Television interview.

“The whole power that the Fed used in that case is gone,” said Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the House Financial Services Committee.

AIG, the New York-based insurer, submitted to the New York Fed a draft of a regulatory filing showing it paid banks, including Goldman Sachs Group Inc. and Societe Generale SA, 100 cents on the dollar for credit-default swaps they bought from the firm. The New York Fed crossed out the reference and AIG dropped the language in a December 2008 filing, e-mails between the company and the regulator show. The e-mails were obtained by Representative Darrell Issa, the top Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

more

Still, there couldn't be a better time for an investigation, which may help to strengthen rgualatory reform and expose the real criminals.

Get it done.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Proud to be the first unrec. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Proud to be the second.
Fuck the failed elf dentist!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Proud to be the 3rd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. OMG! We're having a convention?
;) :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Doesn't matter
Doesn't change reality.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Follow the NY fed on twitter lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. LOL
Edited on Thu Jan-07-10 04:55 PM by AllentownJake
Geithner is a criminal. The more that comes out about AIG, the worse he looks and this occurred before he was nominated....back in September/October. The more that comes out about Treasury actions this year (tax rule rewrites) the worse he looks.

I hope they haul him out of his office in hand cuffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. "Geithner is a criminal."
Hyperbole.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Your wishful thinking has amounted thus far to
FAIL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Geithner is the second least popular person in the administration
I think Larry polls slightly lower.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Unpopularity doesn't equal criminal. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. No, but telling AIG to lie about what they were doing to the public IS a crime.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moosepoop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. "this occurred before he was nominated....back in September/October." No.
The e-mails span five months starting in November 2008 and include requests from the New York Fed to withhold documents and delay disclosures. The correspondence includes e-mails between AIG’s Shannon and attorneys at the New York Fed and its law firm, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP.


True enough, the first e-mail was on November 2, 2008, a few weeks prior to his nomination. But none of it was in September or October.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's clear that there is more than Republicans that are disappointed in the truth
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. No.
I think it's still just Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. Distinction without a difference
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Is there no crime you won't defend..
so long as the criminal has a (D) next to this name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Is there no distortion you won't engage in? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Is there no end to the rhetorical flourishes?
Geithner and Summers were bad choices. Eventually, Obama is gonna have to man up and realize that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. That doesn't make him a criminal.
People have gotten so used to making noise that they no longer care to hear the facts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Yes, many people can't bear to hear the facts so they stick their fingers in their ears
and talk about how sweet smelling the fertilizer is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Some people just
"stick their fingers in their ears" and then make up shit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Instead of insisting the sky is clear and blue, it might behoove you to understand
what this anger is about. Geithner is one of the BIG reasons people are mad. Wall Street never even got its hands slapped for bringing down the economy with trash derivatives. At least in the 1980s when Michael Milkin and crowd used junk bonds to swindle people, there was a real hearing and some real reforms, specifically the Corporate and Auditing Accountability, Responsibility, and Transparency Act of 2002 (aka Sarbanes-Oxley).

" The bill gives the SEC more government funding and greater powers including general oversight and enforcement authority over Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and requires the SEC to report to Congress "the extent of off-balance sheet transactions and the use of special purpose entities."

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/10122007/sec.html

Unfortunately, all this current scandal has brought us is a bill in the House that will GUARANTEE tax-payer dollars WITHOUT a Congressional vote to WALL STREET when they tank the economy again. There is NO reform of derivatives and an extremely weak "Consumer Protection Agency" bill that leaves much about banking services exempt.

Why don't you do some real research and find out why people who actually read more than just talking points (for either party) are really angry?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. "Wall Street never even got its hands slapped for bringing down the economy with trash derivatives."
Is there something stopping Congress from investigating the cause of the crisis or demanding a Justice Department investigation?

What does your Geithner have to do with the crisis?

"Why don't you do some real research and find out why people who actually read more than just talking points (for either party) are really angry?"

Some people need to stop trying so hard to create narratives to accuse people of being involved in scandals, like trying to sqeeze a square peg into a round hole.

There are plenty of people to blame or accuse of criminal wrongdoing for the financial crisis, Geithner isn't one of them.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. "What does your Geithner have to do with the crisis?" Are you serious??
Geithner was the head of the NY Fed during the economic meltdown, and not only did he NOT regulate (as he should have) but he allowed AIG to essentially money launder for other Wall Street firms. You need to read the article and you need to do some research on Geithner.

No wonder you have no understanding. You don't know who the players are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Your response says nothing.
What is Geithner charged with doing? What hand did he have in the failed policies and actions of the Bush administration.

You may need to step back and think about why you're trying to pin the financial crisis on Geithner. It's illogical.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. My response tells you that Geithner was the head of the NY FED and he allowed AIG to essentially
money launder. Now if you don't get why that is a crime, there's nothing I can do to help you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. "he allowed AIG to essentially money launder"
More fact-free claims.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Read the article, if you can understand it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #17
35. Do you know what securities fraud is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Hopefully soon. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeff In Milwaukee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
22. Republicans Disappointed?
Edited on Thu Jan-07-10 05:58 PM by Jeff In Milwaukee
About half of DU is having a cow over this news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
32. In a related story, Nation braces for shortage of Dramamine nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
34. one of the biggest wealth transfers in US history and people here defend him,wonderful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC