Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone ever hear of "the Cardinal Clause"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-07-10 10:47 PM
Original message
Anyone ever hear of "the Cardinal Clause"?
Was watching a show on the Discovery Channel and a woman said she could not have in vitro fertilization to get pregnant because she worked in a Catholic school, and had signed a "Cardinal Clause". She said that she would get fired if she used any kind of artificial means of getting pregnant.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
'Cardinal's clause' used in church firing
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_450289.html
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
But there is another part of the plaintiff's case that is less implausible. Mr. Neuberger claims that Ursuline is not entitled to the religious exemption from nondiscrimination statutes because it is not religious enough. He notes that the school is independent of the diocese; it hires non-Catholics; and it doesn't offer employment contracts with a "cardinal's clause." Such a clause, not uncommon in the workings of religious schools, would mandate that teachers avoid taking a public stance against the church's teachings.
http://blog.beliefnet.com/viamedia/2006/02/youre-fired.html
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Additionally, if those present as witnesses to the event serve in ministry in the church — as teachers, administrators, catechists, chaplains, etc. — they will be deemed to be in violation of the Cardinal’s Clause and/or the Code of Pastoral Conduct. As such, the most serious consequence would be dismissal from ministry and/or loss of employment.
http://www.pittsburghcatholic.org/newsarticles_more.phtml?id=1720
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Non-Catholic teacher brought Title VII action against Catholic school after it failed to renew her contract because of her remarriage. The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Alan N. Bloch, J., 739 F.Supp. 1003, entered summary judgment in favor of school, and teacher appealed. The Court of Appeals, Stapleton, Circuit Judge, held that Title VII did not apply to school's decision.
http://www.churchstatelaw.com/cases/LittleVWuerl.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC