Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"I Assume Full Responsibility."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mike K Donating Member (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:14 AM
Original message
"I Assume Full Responsibility."
I can't speak for today's military but back in the fifties it was widely accepted that a platoon of Marines was worth a company of ordinary (Army)soldiers. That isn't my subjective opinion. I heard it from my father and an uncle, both of whom were in the Army and served in the Pacific, including Guadalcanal, and from several other WW-II and Korea vets.

As I learned later in life this reputation was not the result of physical or mental superiority on the part of individual Marines. It came about as the result of rigid training, one important aspect of which was an inculcated sense of responsibility and impending accountability: In the Marine Corps there are no excuses, only reasons. When something goes wrong somebody is responsible and whoever that somebody is will be held accountable. As a result of this rigid and pervasive policy very few things ever go wrong. Weapons and equipment are maintained to perfection, every i is dotted, every t is crossed, every order is instantly and precisely obeyed -- or there will be very unpleasant consequences. And there are no exceptions.

The bottom line to this Spartan rigidity is maximum efficiency in the field which translates to superior performance and minimal casualties.

President Obama's assumption of responsibility for the near loss of 300 lives on Christmas day is in fact an extremely irresponsible gesture. It is a statement of intent to forego accountability for a serious failure, the ultimate effect of which will be corrosive to the future efficiency of a critically important security agency, the TSA.

Mr. Nice Guy is playing loose and careless with the lives of airline passengers and in doing so he is demonstrating abject incompetence as a leader. He is indeed responsible and that responsibility is for him to determine who allowed this potentially deadly incident to take place and to take appropriate action, both against the individuals involved and their immediate supervisors. And if he doesn't do this he is inviting similar misfeasance, just as his unwillingness to hold certain members of the Bush Administration accountable for their many egregious crimes ensures that future administrators will not be discouraged from doing the same or worse things.

In my opinion, Barack Obama is a nice person but a poor excuse for a President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think he ever said he wasn't interested in finding where the problem was
Rather, he was taking ownership of the problem instead of finger pointing, playing politics and looking for scapegoats.

A bit of a contrast with his predecessor, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nemo137 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. To take another 50's memory.
There was a sign on President Truman's desk reading "The Buck Stops Here," i.e. at the end of the day, it's the president's responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. On the other hand there was jr bush, who took responsibility for nothing
Edited on Fri Jan-08-10 01:27 AM by The_Casual_Observer
He is a moron, but guys like you just love him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is extremely harsh.
There seems to be an assumption that we, the public, are privy to every decision and action taken.
You are assuming no one was held responsible, reprimanded or even fired. There could be mid level
employees that were responsible for not forwarding the intelligence and are being dealt with behind
the scenes. That Obama took the ultimate responsibility and assumed "the buck stops here" response
was admirable. I have my problems with him, but to suggest he is "demonstrating abject incompetence
as a leader" is over the top and petty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. For fuck's sake, who fucking cares about this any more?
Edited on Fri Jan-08-10 01:34 AM by Oregone
Talk about politicizing an incompetent malcontent's failure.

Why are you so fixated on 300 people who *might* have died, when you could be ranting about the ~450 drunk driving fatalities and ~840 death due to lack of health insurance that have occurred since Christmas day. How many little girls get molested in the US each day? How many die of easily treatable diseases? How many families just got kicked out of their homes and onto the streets?

Damn man. We have real fucking problems to deal with, rather than this He-Man vs Skeletor terrorism bullshit. Its all a crock being used to justifying the feeding of the monster in a post cold-war era.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. some people expect Obama to tuck them in and
read them a bedtime story too. FEAR, FEAR, FEAR....we're all gonna die!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
av8rdave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
6. Another thought....
"In my opinion, Barack Obama is a nice person but a poor excuse for a President."

My guess is that this isn't your opinion. I would wager that it's Rush's, or Glenn's, or Sean's, or Bill's. All unbiased observers of politics, of course. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. Being Commander in Chief means
taking responsibility and then finding the problem rather than whining it's them not me or it was the guy before me's fault as the former pResident did
but I can understand why you might try this talking point here first. but the tea just doesn't brew well
welcome to DU but this may not be the best water to "dip your bag" in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. What is that smell?! OMG! Oh, it's your OP.
Edited on Fri Jan-08-10 01:44 AM by TexasObserver
Your view of Marines and their comparative value to the US military is misplaced. They're the least important branch of the military ladder, and they consistently get the recruits that test the lowest, have the most criminal problems, and have the poorest educations. Marines play a role in the US military, but their rep and your commentary are largely matters of fiction. When did the Marines win the war in Iraq and Afghanistan? Or Vietnam? They serve, and they're useful, but don't paint them as more than they are. That's recruiting drivel.


The balance of your post is even more flawed and doesn't require any rebuttal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DIKB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 04:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I was raised military
and have friends serving now.

Brad - Army Psyops
Dirk - Navy Nuke
Andrew - Marine ground-pounder (May he R.I.P.)

You would NEVER get either my navy friend or army buddy to say that a marine was worth many of him or those serving alongside him. Too much pride in their own branch of the military, if not their own specific field.

You're right, the OP reeks to high hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 04:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That's right.
I have Army grunts and and Marines in my family. They love ragging on each other but admit the other service was better then their own? They'd set themselves on fire first.

I smell something too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yes. I've never once heard a single grunt say something like that.
I was in the Air Force forty years ago, and I had uncles in each branch of the military and friends in each branch. To this day, I've never heard any military man say any other branch was better than his branch. Not once. And that includes the military men I know who are in the military now - all of whom are my children's generation.

The whole mythology written in the OP sounds like someone who has never been in the military and never known anyone in the military. It sounds like it was pulled from one of those sappy emails the wingers love to send each other. It sound like the kind of pro GOP emails I still get from guys I knew 40 years ago who wouldn't join the military, like I did, and who used any excuse available (like Rush Limbaugh) to avoid service. But they're all 60 years old now, and haven't voted for a Democrat since they were 1-A. They sure do love to talk about how the USA needs to go kill some foreigners somewhere, though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Every branch of the military thinks they're the best.
And even the baddest bad asses want that air cover when they really need it. Pinned down? Call in the Air Force. Want to pound a position from 40 miles off shore? Call in the Navy. They have guns that fire loads the size of a small car, and will hit targets with great precision.

During Vietnam, on R&R, Army and Marines would have brutal bar fights while they were on R&R. Navy and Air Force guys stayed out of the fighting, but the Army and Marines would go at it. They had a week away from the jungle, and they'd spend part of it in fist fights in bars over who was the baddest bad ass.

We need all the services, and I don't mean to denigrate the Marines, but I also don't like the phony hero worship. Soldiers are typically young guys who don't know much about anything except the things they've been taught by their military superiors. That's why so many in Iraq think Saddam had something to do with 9-11. That's why they think Afghanistan is about stopping terror attacks in the US. Most don't know history. They don't know politics. They don't understand anything about foreign policy.

If they're Marines, they know taking that hill. If they're Army, they know taking that hill, but using more weapons than just small arms. If they're Air Force, they know bombing that hill until it's flat and smoldering, and nothing alive remains on it. If they're Navy, they know how to paint and salute. Just kidding, sailors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
13. unrec'd for not knowing the difference between TSA and Intelligence Agencies..
How many people got fired when Bush dealt with Richard Reid? Selective memory strikes again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
14. Hey, if you're so gung-ho, why didn't you serve?
:shrug:

I'm the biggest pussy you ever met, and even *I* did.

IOW, I accord your OP zero credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:29 AM
Original message
Same as when Reagan "took responsibility" for the Vincennes plane shoot-down
It's a grandstand move to placate critics, but it can actually impede proper investigation and accounting for the incident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. dupe
Edited on Fri Jan-08-10 10:29 AM by JHB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
18. "The buck stops here"
Familiar with that quote? Obama is the chief, and the chief takes the blame, unless the chief is a scum weasel who gets others to take the fall for him.

The bomber is in custody and will be tried, and Obama called out the intelligence community on national television shortly thereafter. Either you expect to see mass firings or you're one of the scaredy-cats who want to sacrifice even more civil liberties so you don't feel quite as scared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
19. It's very cold out today
I hope the pizza delivery guy can make it to you with at least a warm pizza if not a not one...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I think the pizza delivery man is KIA.
He usually is on anti-Obama threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
21. Agree.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
22. Is it not also true that historically speaking, the marines also have the
highest causality rate among all the other services?

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guy Whitey Corngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
23. .
:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
24. At least you changed a couple of the words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC