PM Martin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 03:52 PM
Original message |
REPUBLICAN to take TED KENNEDY's SENATE SEAT! |
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
1. highly unlikely, but Coakley has been running a truly lackluster campaign |
PM Martin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. If you lose seats in your strongholds, that bodes horribly for |
tritsofme
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 03:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
There is a chance it won't be a blow out. I can't believe Coakley could do worse than 53%.
|
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. She will win. No reason to panick. Not that she is great, but we know enough not to send |
|
a RWer on Kennedy's seat, I would hope,
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Hold on! neither post says a republican is going to take Ted's senate race--they say |
|
that what seemed like a lock for democrats may not be unless the candidate gets it into gear. she has been running a under the radar campaign. But it should be noted that the only public poll is Ras and she is up by 9 right now.
|
fascisthunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 04:03 PM
Response to Original message |
6. lol... not gonna happen |
glen123098
(419 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 04:09 PM
Response to Original message |
7. According to intrade republicans only have a 10 percent chance. |
nykym
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |
8. They will take the seat |
|
if the Democratic voters stay at home and say there is nothing to worry about. Remember, if you don't vote You not only lose the election but the right to complain.
|
chelsea0011
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |
9. It won't happen. The woman's vote will carry her to victory. |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-08-10 04:42 PM by chelsea0011
But a poll shows him within 10 points and the local news goes into overdrive that he is within reach of a victory. He won't get to 50%. And what anyone needs to know about Brown is that he is proclaiming himself pro-choice but got the endorsement of the Mass Right to Life Committee, and didn't request that they not endorse him. And this is the guy who says he is running on a different kind of independant Republicant platform. What a SOS. And I kike that he ran an ad where JFK morphs into Brown when it should have Bush morphing into Brown. He is almost exactly like him. Also, she started running TV ads yesterday. It will all change soon.
|
whistler162
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
pollsters asked people standing outside a building who they would vote for and since it was the local Republican club most said the Republican candidate!
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |
11. hysterical thread of the month |
pipi_k
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-08-10 05:53 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Unlikely to have happened, but even less likely now that |
|
Teddy's widow has endorsed Martha Coakley.
If Coakley wins by any less than 60%, I'll be surprised.
I know I'll be voting for her, anyway.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message |