|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-08-10 07:05 PM Original message |
"It's only been a year!!1" -- -- -- we've only GOT one year left! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-08-10 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
1. unrec unrec lol.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-08-10 07:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. They never had an EFFECTIVE 60 vote majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-08-10 07:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. Even lower expectations for a sub-60 majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:15 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. So true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LoZoccolo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 05:06 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. And yet people here won't lift a finger to effectively create more liberals. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 06:43 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. and watch people like you blame liberal candidates like Nader when your status quo candidates lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 09:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Guaranteed nobody will effectively address the supermajority that moderates/conservatives have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RUMMYisFROSTED (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:54 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. Self-identified as 21% but policy-wise a majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:14 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Yes, certain issues are definitely appealing to a majority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:56 AM Response to Reply #9 |
25. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-08-10 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
4. the dems pissed away a once in a decade chance to enact a progressive agenda |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truedelphi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:52 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. + 1. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 01:59 AM Response to Reply #4 |
7. I think you are on the money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftstreet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 03:44 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tango-tee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 05:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. Indeed. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toasterlad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jan-08-10 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well, Of Course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. If you call a Big ass stimulus (by historical standards), |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Donnachaidh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:16 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. big assed stimulus -- 2 thirds of which have NOT even been used yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:52 AM Response to Reply #8 |
21. And after this word from our sponsor we return to regularly scheduled programming. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 02:35 AM Response to Original message |
11. I have a fundamental problem with this "short-term" view. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 03:30 AM Response to Original message |
12. He's gonna fuck it up for everybody and then blame Congress for his inaction |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ima_sinnic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 07:09 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. +++1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Frosty1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:47 AM Response to Reply #12 |
20. If this is how you support Democrats |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingliberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 10:57 AM Response to Reply #12 |
23. The House is at huge risk over this "cadillac plan tax" and he knows it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 02:02 AM Response to Reply #23 |
27. And Senator John Forbes Kerry leads that tax plan the same way as the Charge of the Light Brigade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 09:18 AM Response to Original message |
19. larry sabato...bwahahahahahaa fuck him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jan-09-10 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
26. We got punked! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 02:16 AM Response to Original message |
28. Obama can move his *real* agenda without a big majority. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EmeraldCityGrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jan-10-10 02:33 AM Response to Original message |
29. Obama at times seems dead set |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC