Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MagicJack's next act: disappearing cell phone fees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:43 PM
Original message
MagicJack's next act: disappearing cell phone fees


http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/us_tec_gadget_show_magicjack

LAS VEGAS -

The company behind the magicJack, the cheap Internet phone gadget that's been heavily promoted on TV, has made a new version of the device that allows free calls from cell phones in the home, in a fashion that's sure to draw protest from cellular carriers.

The new magicJack uses, without permission, radio frequencies for which cellular carriers have paid billions of dollars for exclusive licenses.

YMax Corp., which is based in Palm Beach, Fla., said this week at the International Consumers Electronics Show that it plans to start selling the device in about four months for $40, the same price as the original magicJack. As before, it will provide free calls to the U.S. and Canada for one year.

The device is, in essence, a very small cellular tower for the home.

The size of a deck of cards, it plugs into a PC, which needs a broadband Internet connection. The device then detects when a compatible cell phone comes within 8 feet, and places a call to it. The user enters a short code on the phone. The phone is then linked to the magicJack, and as long as it's within range (YMax said it will cover a 3,000-square-foot home) magicJack routes the call itself, over the Internet, rather than going through the carrier's cellular tower. No minutes are subtracted from the user's account with the carrier. Any extra fees for international calls are subtracted from the user's account with magicJack, not the carrier.

According to YMax CEO Dan Borislow, the device will connect to any phone that uses the GSM standard, which in the U.S. includes phones from AT&T Inc. and T-Mobile USA. At a demonstration at CES, a visitor's phone with a T-Mobile account successfully placed and received calls through the magicJack. Most phones from Verizon Wireless and Sprint Nextel Corp. won't connect to the device.

Borislow said the device is legal because wireless spectrum licenses don't extend into the home.

AT&T, T-Mobile and the Federal Communications Commission had no immediate comment on whether they believe the device is legal, but said they were looking into the issue. CTIA — The Wireless Association, a trade group, said it was declining comment for now. None of them had heard of YMax's plans.

Borislow said YMax has sold 5 million magicJacks for landline phones in the last two years, and that roughly 3 million are in active use. That would give YMax a bigger customer base than Internet phone pioneer Vonage Holdings Corp., which has been selling service for $25 per month for the better part of a decade. Privately held YMax had revenue of $110 million last year, it says.

U.S. carriers have been selling and experimenting with devices that act similarly to the wireless magicJack. They're called "femtocells." Like the magicJack, they use the carrier's licensed spectrum to connect to a phone, then route the calls over a home broadband connection. They improve coverage inside the home and offload capacity from the carrier's towers.

But femtocells are complex products, because they're designed to mesh with the carrier's external network. They cost the carriers more than $200, though some sell them cheaper, recouping the cost through added service fees. YMax's magicJack is a much smaller, simpler design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-08-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow.
That's just...wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I've used MJ for 4 y4ears for my home 0y9he with no problems.
I didn't know agout the cell phone option until tjos post but I will check it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
richmwill Donating Member (972 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. So, I can't use it when I'm out of the house...
...Sorry, that won't work for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greennina Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. You don't need it when you're out of your house.
Your comment makes no damn sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. um that is whgat your cellphone minutes aee used for.
The goal of the device is too replace your landline w/ cellphone with added bonus that all minutes at home are routed over the internet for free.

So your "800 minute" plan just became an "800 minute + unlimited minutes at home" plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I never use up the minutes
that are part of my plan so this would be of no benefit to me. I need less minutes not more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greennina Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
4. Motorola had these phones in the early 90's
If you were at home it used your land line rather than the cell phone companies line. Since I had to use a phone at that time for work, the Motorola device saved my employer hundreds of dollars a month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beyurslf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. That will be great. I know we use a lot of minutes while at home.
Will it support more than one cell phone though? We have 5 cell phones in my house or would I need a jack for each one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lildreamer316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. This will be great becaue t=mobile KEEPS DROPPING CALLS IN MY HOUSE.
Sorry, but it REALLY pisses me off. When I had Suncom (that Tmobile took over last year) I had absolutely NO problems placing and keeping calls in my house. Now I drop them all the time. It's extremely frustrating.
Maybe this'll learn 'em. Ha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. I have Ooma - I love it so far.
Doesn't have to run through a computer and is therefore more reliable.

I ditched my overpriced comcast account for this. The comcast line always had static and dropped calls. The free Ooma service is clear and reliable so far. The cost is a bit higher than magicjack, but from what i've heard the sound is better. And the cost was covered in three months compared to my comcast bill.

here's their website if anyone is interested: http://www.ooma.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC