Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pharmacists Assoc Pushes For HC Bill Changes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 07:43 PM
Original message
Pharmacists Assoc Pushes For HC Bill Changes
ALEXANDRIA, Va., Jan. 6 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- With Senate and House leaders trying to craft a health care reform bill to send to the White House, the National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA) today offered lawmakers updated recommendations for the would-be final legislation.

"Community pharmacists are ready and willing to help improve health outcomes and lower costs," said NCPA Executive Vice President and CEO Bruce T. Roberts, RPh. "We greatly appreciate the bipartisan backing in both chambers for reforms that support community pharmacists. The recommendations we present here will make a good thing even better for patients. We will continue working with Congress in hopes of enacting these proposals."

In a letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., NCPA offered the following suggestions: http://www.ncpanet.org/pdf/ncpaviewsonconferencereportjanuary2010.pdf


*Reform the Medicaid Average Manufacturer Price (AMP) reimbursement system for generic drugs and adopt, at a minimum, the Senate's federal upper limit of no less than 175% of the weighted average AMP. Anything less could force many independent community pharmacies, which care for an extraordinarily high number of Medicaid patients, out of the program.

*Combine House-passed transparency provisions for pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) operating in the proposed health insurance exchange with Senate language extending the reporting requirements to Medicare Part D drug plans. A broad coalition of consumer and labor advocates also support PBM transparency to root out wasteful spending.

*Assure seniors access to essential durable medical equipment (DME) by adopting the Senate's proposal to exempt from Medicare's burdensome, duplicative accreditation requirements those pharmacies that derive no more than five percent of total prescription sales from DME, such as diabetes testing supplies.

*Support all House and Senate-passed provisions expanding the community pharmacist's ability to provide medication therapy management services to maximize the patient's adherence and therapeutic benefit while lowering the cost of inappropriate prescription drug use -- estimated at $290 billion annually.


NCPA's letter also raises questions about how a new, government-sponsored "public option" would impact independent pharmacies, both in terms of reimbursement as well as small business health insurance requirements; suggests alternatives to a costly proposed mandate under Medicare; cautions against any federal pre-emption of state-based "any willing provider" laws; opposes moving Medicare vaccination coverage into the Part B program; backs safeguards to prevent 340B, low-income drug subsidies from being diverted to hospital employees and others; seeks clarification that any provision allowing the government to set Medicare drug prices not apply to pharmacy reimbursement; and supports House-passed language to close the Medicare Part D coverage gap, or "donut hole."

The National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA(R)) represents America's community pharmacists, including the owners of more than 22,700 independent community pharmacies, pharmacy franchises, and chains. Together they represent an $88 billion health-care marketplace, employ over 65,000 pharmacists, and dispense over 40% of all retail prescriptions. To learn more go to www.ncpanet.org or read NCPA's blog, The Dose, at http://ncpanet.wordpress.com.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC