Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. One of Two Countries Where Kids' Educational Attainment is Lower Than Their Parents'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 09:19 PM
Original message
U.S. One of Two Countries Where Kids' Educational Attainment is Lower Than Their Parents'
By Daniela Perdomo, AlterNet

According to a recent report, Americans aged 25–34 have attained less education than their parents' generation.

If the data cited by the American Association of State Colleges and Universities (AASCU) commission report is correct, the United States and Germany are the only two nations in the world where this holds true.

Indeed, while the United States ranks second among all nations in the proportion of population aged 35-64 with a college degree, we rank tenth in the percentage of those aged 25-34 with an associate's or high school degree.

To make matters worse, there's been a steady decline in American students pursuing degrees in science, technology, engineering and mathematics -- while places like China and India are investing heavily in the infrastructures to support premier programs in those courses of study.

More:
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/145033/u.s._one_of_two_countries_where_kids%27_educational_attainment_is_lower_than_their_parents%27/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tuition is 10 times what it was when the parents were in college
and there are fewer reasonable student loans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now I'm just dying to know what is the other country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Germany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. to bad the report did`t explore the reasons why there is a decline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raejeanowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Worst Part of All In My Personal Opinion
The actual literacy rate-regardless of level of education on paper-has noticeably declined; it takes the achievement of today's undergrad college degree to approximate the knowledge base assimilated by the typical 1950-60s high school graduate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Oh this is bad. Very bad.
You'd think the bad employment situation would result in higher enrollment too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hard work pays off
We've short-changed our educational system for the last 30 years, and pouring our resources into things like how to make money without producing anything (junk bonds, CDOs, etc.). Time was in the country, if you wanted to go to college, you could. You might have to piece it together with a combination of financial aid, scholarships, and the college not your first choice, but it was usually doable if you had the grades or the commitment. Now? Well, if Daddy doesn't own an oil well or two, or you don't feel like saddling yourself with six figures of debt before your 22nd birthday, you might just as well forget higher education. And lower education has been underfunded for years, with lurid tales of exorbitant teacher salaries and such. But the plain fact of the matter is that we've bought the modified libertarian/Republican bullshit about lower taxes and less government, and this is our reward.

Enjoy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-09-10 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. Its not exactly like gaining a science/ math/ or engineering job will mean a job.
I have a science degree.. yet the jobs aren't really there.. they are for H1b visa'd persons who will take less money and don't have huge loans to repay. Its a lie when they say there aren't enough people with these degrees... I want to scream every time I hear that lie. I am one un-used degree that is almost pd off after 10 yrs of doing nothing with it (I'm working in the same type of job I was while attending college). I also know many of my friends who graduated with degrees in science/ math/ engineering that are in fields that have nothing to do with science. Bush really killed money for science/ research etc... The only fields that seemed to grow were in pharma... and a job like that could kill you (honestly the stats for people working in a pharma lab are disgusting.. cancer, children with disabilities increased for women in the labs and more % of miscarriages)... I had a QA in one lab I worked for (an environmental testing lab that used just as harmful chemicals as the chemicals we were testing for) had to leave his pharma job because his hands were shaking too badly to perform his task.. he took and early "retirement" from that company. The shaking was so bad that he couldn't write with a pencil... and he was young only 50. I got out of the lab I was in after wayyy too many accidents.. acid burns all over my arms (I still have white spots on my forearms). One time I had a 4L bottle of a really bad chemical explode over the front of me.. I had 2nd degree burns on my chest (I still may end up with breast cancer from that one). If I were to become pregnant while working in that particular lab, I would have to do "office" work for 9 mo's (a supervisor prior to me starting had her fetus die in her womb--after that no more pregnancies in the lab-- the entire lab was predominantly staffed with females). On top of that, the wage was only a few dollars more than min. wage. Barely worth the risks. The more natural and nature made products we can use instead of chemical (pharma) would be better all the way around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC