gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 03:34 PM
Original message |
How/why did Harry Reid get the gig? |
|
I'm not as "off with his head" as some are, but I've always wondered. Wouldn't they want a kick-ass person in that position? Does the phrase "kick ass" come to mind when you picture Harry?
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message |
1. But but but.... HE WAS A BOXER BACK IN 1914, DAMN IT !11!!11! |
|
That's how tough he is. :crazy:
Yeah right..... I'll bet he took a dive then, too.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Same reason they elected the wimp Dashle. And it was Daschle and Reid |
|
who encouraged Obama to run for Prez.
|
kenfrequed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
3. He was absurdly polite |
|
To the blue dogs and conservadems while still supposedly being liberal. That and his picture is next to the definition of milquetoast in the dictionary.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. No kidding -- he's like a genteel Southern Belle. nt |
AzDar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I don't know how he secured the position, or how he's retained it; he's been completely |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 03:42 PM by AzDar
ineffective. I only recently found out that he was the inspiration for the corrupt state senator in "Casino"...
:wow:
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. I didn't know that - now I'm going to get Casino and keep him in |
|
mind while I watch it.
But that must be it -- and I KNOW it's always the answer so I don't know why I was questioning it --it's the money and connections. Always.
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. He was elected by the other Democratic senators.... |
|
...like any other majority leader.
|
AzDar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Yeeesssss. Thanks for that. I was questioning his merits rather than the actual mechanisms... |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 04:10 PM by AzDar
edited for: too much sarcasm... (is there *really* such a thing?)
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. That is his merit.... |
|
...he's acceptable to the majority of his peers in the caucus. No snark. I would prefer a Sherrod Brown or a Pat Leahy, but they just don't have the votes.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
10. I should have been more clear -- why did they think he would |
|
be good in that position? I'm just curious if I'm reading him wrong, mis-judging him, whatever. I've felt, whenever I've seen him, that we need somebody stronger.
|
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 03:56 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Just an idea, but I think it had a lot to do with how willing he was to be involved in |
|
the day-to-day scheduling of legislation and administrative activities, how well they (the Democratic caucus) thought he got along with the staffs of senators and his willingness to put up with a lot of detailed crap. As far as leadership, he certainly does not project any, but maybe he has a way of keeping most of the people aimed somewhat in the same direction on the administrative work associated with legislation. To answer your second question: No, he does not seem like a "kick ass" guy but is very deferential to the republicans who do not reciprocate any respect.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. You may well be right, but jeez, what were they thinking? I think |
|
a lot of others would have been willing to put up with the detailed crap in order to be the Leader. :shrug:
Biden (and others, but I'm most familiar with him) gets along with Republicans just fine, but wouldn't lay down like Reid has done, IMO. So we need someone in the LBJ, Biden, ??? mold.
It will be interesting to see what, if anything, comes of this.
|
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. After I wrote that about his being deferential to republicans, I think now that I may |
|
have understated it. While most of the senators of both parties make a phony show of being congenial or polite, he is congenial to a fault and the republicans respond to him in the most repugnant way. You think he would toughen up and fight back, but it just seems to be his meek and deferential personality that would be meritorious anywhere but the US Senate where hatefulness and viciousness wins.
|
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Reid was elected because he's a DLC member |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-11-10 04:13 PM by Individualist
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-11-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Sigh. You're probably right. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:31 AM
Response to Original message |