Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:50 PM
Original message |
Poll question: How much do you care if Reid loses his job over this race remark? |
tekisui
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I've wanted him replaced for years, but this is the dumbest reason |
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
My bigger concern is that Nevada doesn't elect another democrat.
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
33. Nevada is still a swing state unfortunately. It hasn't evolved enough to |
|
have a stronger Dem party and candidates. That will/must come...
|
dflprincess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
YOY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
15. and it smacks of being bullied by Republicans. |
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I wanted him to go months ago for his lack of a spine |
|
The only bad thing about him leaving now is that it makes look like the gop'ers forced him out, when I think the Dems should have bumped him from his power seat when Obama came in.
|
KittyWampus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
5. How willing are you to participate in a witch hunt just cause you don't like the "witch"? |
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
18. That's an interesting question. |
|
I'm going to have to think about that for a little bit.
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I know that this is a crappy attitude, but IMO, there's so many reasons to fire Reid as Majority ... |
|
Leader, my view is, sadly, "any port in a storm."
Resign Harry! Resign Now! :blush:
|
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:56 PM
Original message |
Is this just about him being Majority Leader, or will he lose his seat? |
|
Will the dems be able to win in his replacement election?
|
ShortnFiery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I don't know but seriously, Harry is 70 y.o., isn't it about time that the good people of Nevada ... |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 01:59 PM by ShortnFiery
elect some "new blood" to represent them in The Senate?
It's almost as if the Members of Our Congress are now all "Popes and Cardinals" = elected for life.
It's both the individuals' and the constituents' fault, but it's CONGRESS for Heaven's sake, not The Supreme Court nor A Papal Appointment from Rome. :shrug:
|
Cant trust em
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
21. I can never seem to make up my mind on how I feel about term limits |
|
For every Reid or Feinstein, there's also a Kennedy or a Feingold.
|
Brickbat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I'm not crazy about him, but this would be a dumb reason and set a bad precedent. |
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
27. I'll sign on with this opinion. |
T Wolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
9. If only for the false-equivalence with Lott. The two statements were nothing alike - neither |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 01:54 PM by T Wolf
in tone, intent, nor meaning. But what passes for political discourse and reason in Amerika today says they are the same. For that reason alone would I want Harry (schmuck that he is) to NOT lose his post. For his role in the debacle of Democratic congressional action since 2006, he does deserve to lose his seat.
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Maybe he could find a job he's good at. Kissing corporate asses pays well. |
|
And, he certainly has plenty of experience.
|
tblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Reid has a lot to answer for, but he's done |
|
answering for this. It's a nonissue.
Now, as for being a weenie of a Majority Leader, he should be cut loose.
|
librechik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
12. It's a totally bogus reason |
|
However, if we get Durban or Leahy or (please God) Boxer instead of Reid, I would not cry.
|
bluethruandthru
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I don't want him to lose his Senate seat... |
|
but I really would like him replaced as Majority leader.
|
cali
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |
14. A lot. Fortunately, he won't lose his ML post over this |
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 01:59 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Reid's a weak and ineffective leader. If that was the reason, I'd be fine with it..... |
|
I wouldn't be fine with him losing it over this flap, because of the hypocrisy on the part of those demanding his ouster. The ends don't always justify the means.
|
Deep13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
19. Anyone who can count should be concerned about it. nt |
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:01 PM
Response to Original message |
20. If Reid loses his seat over this, the GOP gains enormous momentum they do not need. |
|
They also have a precedent to call for the removal of other Dems based on spurious reasoning.
|
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
28. That is exactly correct. |
|
After Reid the GOP would simply pick off another, then another, then another.
|
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
34. And, even tho lots of us hate the HCR bill, the GOP knows that getting Reid to resign |
|
basically defeats the bill. That's what is going on with the pukes right now...they'd don't give a rat's ass about racism since they are its biggest purveyors.
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
22. A lot because it's such an incredibly flimsy pretense |
|
Take the man's job away because he's been ineffective and has fought the wrong battles nearly every time.
Don't take it away because he stated a fact using a polite term.
His sin is only that he held up a mirror to the voting public and they didn't like what they saw in it.
|
hlthe2b
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I doubt there is any Dem or progressive that has not been frustrated with Reid, but how foolish. We seem forever doomed to shoot ourselves in the foot, if this is how people really feel.
|
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message |
24. I hope he does lose his job |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 02:14 PM by bigwillq
But not because of the racialisticism (:P) comments
|
90-percent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message |
|
is different than "Losing his job over this race remark"
It would be a terrible injustice to lose his job because of this remark.
I have no problem with him losing his job from poor job performance, however.
This remark thing is insignificant and he should not feel any repercussions from it.
It's just another make Obama (and the Dems) fail opportunity from the hypocritical Republican "opposition".
-90% jimmy
|
salguine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message |
26. It would be the right thing for the wrong reason. Reid should have been gone a long |
|
time ago, but due to general worthlessness as a leader, not for this.
|
upi402
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
29. agreed. still, 20% give a damn as of now... not good |
|
maybe The Colonels's chickens have the deep fryer in sight and are starting to give a cluck.
|
oldlib
(549 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Don't allow the GOOP to do this. |
|
He should be removed from Majority Leader by the Senate and to retain his seat as a member of the Senate.
|
ladjf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:48 PM
Response to Original message |
31. Horse crap! Negro is Spanish for black. So, he gets kicked out |
|
for using a Spanish word that simply describes a color. And please don't give me any of that what it means to this person or that person. Reid is an older man. For most of his life, the term "negro" referring to "African Americans" was the respectful word that was used.
|
Sebastian Doyle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
32. You're forgetting the religious context |
|
Reid was raised to believe that black people were descended from the 1/3 of the angels who refused to take sides in the battle between Elohim and Lucifer just prior to the creation of earth.
Or in other words, "too lazy to fight Satan".
The irony here is that Reid's performance as Majority "Leader" has a lot in common with those lazy angels.
|
ProgressiveProfessor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message |
35. By job I assume you meant position |
|
I fully believe he will lose his seat in the next election.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |