live love laugh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 03:01 PM
Original message |
Soooooooo...I'm listening to Ed Schultz re: the Halperin expose |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-12-10 03:07 PM by live love laugh
and Halperin tells Schultz that Palin was so full of misinformation during the campaign that McCain's staffers were alarmed. (Old news)
But, they said, McCain didn't know about any of this. He was totally distanced from any part of the vetting process "because that's the kind of manager he is."
:wtf:
And THAT'S not news that's more important than what Harry Reid said? This man was going to run our country but didn't even particpate in the selecting the person who would be running it in his absence?
Ed Schultz just glossed right over the issue and moved on to attack the next democrat.
All day long people have been calling about the blood on Bush/Cheney's hands vs. the lightweight gossip from this book. Ed keeps shutting them down.
I've been listening to him for a while--he was gung ho Obama for a bit but I'm beginning to wonder about him. Again.
|
Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message |
blondeatlast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That "maverick" is a product of the RNC Chair Rush Limbaugh just as much as |
|
he is Dick Cheney.
Ed? Can't figure him out at all.
|
Vincardog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. There is nothing to figure about Ed. He was a RW hack until his wife told him he could do better |
|
being a LW hack. Now he rants about the things he used to support.
|
live love laugh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I didn't know Ed was a former Republicant. That explains why they hairs on my neck |
|
stood up when I first heard him on the air. I've since softened to him a bit--especially because he was so supportive of Obama. But it seems to me that he only fattened Obama up for what will be an inevitable kill later. I don't think his intentions are pure.
|
Vincardog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-13-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. His intentions are just as pure as any hack they are to get an audience and money |
BOSSHOG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 03:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The book is the bible per conservatives relative to democrats, but the stuff about palin they just poo-poo. Must be an awesome job of writing a book, half of which is fact, half of which is fiction.
|
live love laugh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I don't know if half is fiction but I do know that the "Librul Media" is certainly selective |
|
in picking out the tidbits regarding democrats while ignoring the rest.
And, if they have some much inside info on the Dems, why isn't there equal inside info on their opponents. Now that might actually be interesting--but then, the other side would probably be in jail if their off-the-record comments were published.
|
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 03:12 PM
Response to Original message |
4. If it doesn't involve bombing, McFail wants no part of the action. |
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-12-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. But Sarah Palin bombed |
|
So, McCain must've had something to do with it.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 07:42 PM
Response to Original message |