Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Neighbors cut off Oakland Zoo's elephant snacks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 12:40 PM
Original message
Neighbors cut off Oakland Zoo's elephant snacks
Neighbors cut off Oakland Zoo's elephant snacks
Carolyn Jones, Chronicle Staff Writer

Friday, January 15, 2010

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Someone had finally found a use for the nonnative, fire-hazard trees in the Oakland hills: feed them to the elephants.

For seven years, Oakland Zoo crews had chopped down black acacia trees and delivered the crunchy snacks to the zoo's elephants, giraffes, camels, zebras and elk.

For much of that time, the zoo had permission from the Navy-run Oak Knoll site to take the trees. But in recent years, after the military pulled out of the site, the zoo continued taking the trees - and also took a few from a city park, King Estates Open Space, without permission.

Irate neighbors of those sites recently alerted the city and threatened to take legal action to stop the zoo's practice - and the zoo stopped taking trees a few months ago.

"The trees don't belong to them. It's theft," said Don Mitchell of the Sequoyah Hills/Oak Knoll Neighborhood Association, the same group that successfully fought to get a developer to clean up toxic substances at the former Oak Knoll Naval Hospital.

"If I had gone to King Estates and chopped down 10 trees, I'd be arrested and prosecuted," he said.


Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/15/BAVQ1BIEJF.DTL#ixzz0chh1RmX9
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Cretins..... I hope the public backlash makes them miserable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Taking the trees without permission was not a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They had permission when the Navy was there. Whats the problem with removing invasive fire threat?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Navy trees were fine. The public park trees? Not so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. What is wrong with removing an invasive fire hazard? Do you want to parks Dept to PAY to remove them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I don't want people or organizations walking into public parks and deciding on their own...
what trees can be cut down and then cutting them down without any sort of permission sought or obtained by the people charged with protecting the park.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. IS that the choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. The HOA NAZIS like the "nonnative, fire-hazard trees" go figure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. A neighborhood association is not the same thing as an HOA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-15-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Feed the HOA to the elephants...
...can't, though, they're vegetraians. Maybe they have lions at the Oakland Zoo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC