Coakley's internals show her up by 2

[BzaDem]

With the usual huge grain of salt for internal polls and for one night samples:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/1/18/826283/-Link-for-report-of-Coakley-internal-poll-showing-her-up-2

Last night was apparently +2 for Brown. So while one day samples are very volatile (and who knows the validity of this), there still may be a chance.

GOTV!

[Tom Rinaldo]

1. I think she will win, though I'm not confident

It should never have been this close, but that's a topic better discussed on Wednesday.

[TexasObserver]

2. recommended

[FrenchieCat]

3. Kick!

[necso]

4. A vote for Brown

is a vote for gridlock, and a vote against any sort of reform. (Unless "reform" is defined as destroying working government, trying to gut social security, etc. But we've been there and it didn't work; because people who don't believe in government can't make government work.)

[SoCalDem]

5. If you google "Coakley polls", you will notice immediately that the venues that

say "the bottom's dropping out of Coakley's numbers" are ALL right wingers.. Of course their echo chamber makes it seem as if EVERYONE's onboard with their vision, since they are all saying the exact same thing... nd based on two right wing polls..

Time will tell, but the media has thoroughly enjoyed the possibility of Teddy's seat being "flipped"...

there was no drama..nothing to drone on and on about, if a democrat replaced him

to the media, politics is all a game.. they don't really care who wins or loses.. It;s all about how long they can drag out a juicy "story"..