Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

" Its ALL Joe Lieberman's FAULT !!! "

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:29 PM
Original message
" Its ALL Joe Lieberman's FAULT !!! "
ANYONE who STILL believes that this failure of a Health Care "Reform" Bill is ALL Joe Lieberman's Fault is naive beyond belief.

In 2008, the American People gave Obama and The Democratic Party a HUGE Mandate for "CHANGE".
The White House and the Democratic Party Leadership could have CRUSHED Joe Lieberman anytime they wanted to.....IF they had wanted to!

Former Chairman of the DLC Joe Lieberman merely Took One for The Team.
The DLC New Team

(Screen Capped from the DLC Website)


Individual Mandates to BUY Health Insurance without a Public Option
coupled with massive Welfare (Trillion Dollars) for For Profit Health Insurance Corporations
IS a Republican Health Care Plan.



But...but...but...Its ALL Joe Lieberman's fault ! :cry:
The Democrats never had 60 votes! :cry:
YOU don't know how Congress works! :cry:
Bullshit.

Joe Lieberman is an unpopular worm who could have, and should have been crushed shortly after he campaigned FOR the Republican Party.
The fact that he wasn't is PROOF that he is serving a useful purpose for those in charge.


White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs this morning:
(paraphrase)
Who could have predicted that letting Joe Lieberman and Olympia Snow write the Health Care "Reform" Bill would piss off so many Democrats? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I blame Ralph Nader - if he didn't run in 2000
Perhaps Joementum could be President today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Ouch!
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 02:34 PM by dkf
Damn at least we were saved from that hell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. Good one! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr. Strange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
48. !
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. WERD!
Tell it like it IS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Democrats enabled Liebermans poison pill.
So yes they did screw up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Liebermann is just a convenient fall guy
for the Democrats selling us out to the health insurers. It's becoming pretty clear that the bill the Senate passed is the one Obama and his DLC pals wanted all along.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. that post is like alex jones with a dash of art bell thrown in for flavor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Obama said he "got 95% of what he wanted."
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. I tremble to think what the other 5% might have been
seeing as he now claims he never thought a public option was necessary. I can only guess it would have made this bill even worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. you manage to post that pic every day, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Yes!
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 02:43 PM by bvar22
STILL proudly displayed on the DLC Website!
http://www.dlc.org/ndol_ci.cfm?contentid=254886&kaid=86&subid=85

STILL pertinent.
STILL Current Events.

Why does it bother you so much? :shrug:

Here it is again in case you missed it!

The DLC New Team

(Screen Capped from the DLC Website)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. just asking a question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. and not answering any.
Why does this picture bother you so much?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. i'm not a fan of the DLC, but apparently they're some kind of all-purpose bogey-man for you.
whatever floats your boat i guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. bogey-man ?

The DLC is the simplest explanation for the Corporate Sell Performance of the Democratic Party over the last 20 years.

Unlike the Bogey-man, the DLC is very, VERY REAL.
Does the Bogey-man have a website?
The DLC does.

Go read up on what they want to do with Social Security and Medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. Its a picture that can't be repeated too much
IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
44. Do you object to the picture being posted
or do you object to the Republican wing of the Democratic Party having more power in the party than real Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. If Obama had been more like LBJ this never would have
happened.:spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1sKid Donating Member (223 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Ah Grasshopper,
you have finally mastered the talking point du jour that you can never go wrong with on here lol!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
26. Possibly - but the next question that arises is why didn't LBJ establish universal healthcare...
Not to mention others before him. I believe Truman wanted to, for example. There must be some pretty powerful forces against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Admittedly, I should have added the sarcasm tag but I feel
like fuckin with people today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. LBJ DID open the door with Medicare.
Expanding Medicare would have been the easiest way to gain REAL HCR.
Let the Republicans attack Medicare!

..But there is NO payoff for Big Pharm and Big Insurance (both incestuous 1st Cousins of Wall Street)
if we simply expanded Medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. He got Medicare eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. They rolled out Ronnie Raygun records at Tea Parties back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
56. OBAMA HAS 68% DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS?!?!?!??! You're kidding right?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. As I said many times, this bill should be titled
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 02:39 PM by quinnox
"The Joe Lieberman Health Care Reform Act"
He had the most influence and the Democrats bent over backwards to accommodate his every whim. No wonder the bill sucks, it has Lieberman's stamp of approval all over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. You're worse than Holy Joe IMO
Let that fact sink in for awhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Oh YES!.
I am the one who knocked the wheels of the entire Democratic Party's "attempt" at Health Care Reform.

I'm the one who campaigned for the Republican Party in 2008.

I'm WORSE than Joe Lieberman!
:rofl:

I'm glad YOU think I'm THAT powerful.
Unfortunately, I DID campaign on a Public Option.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. IMO you're worse because you're predending to give a shit..
While still calling one of the greatest Democratic achievements in half a century a failure.

At least Holy Joe doesn't try to hide his love for the status quo.

For gawd's sake, get with the fucking program and help us help the uninsured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #40
45. The reason I oppose this bill is BECAUSE I give a shit.
You are selling the lipstick and ignoring the PIG.

YES. Some people would be helped,
but at a Pyrrhic cost.

The PIG:
Individual Mandates with NO Public Option is the FOUNDATION of The Bill.
It permanently enshrines the For Profit Health Insurance Industry as the gateway to Health Care in America.
No future "adjustments" will make THIS FOUNDATION better.
It can't be "fixed later".

For context, compare THIS bill to Health Care in ANY civilized country in The WORLD.
"A Uniquely American Solution"....INDEED.


The Blood Bath:
LESS than 35% of ALL Americans support Mandates without a Public Option.
This will NOT campaign well against Republicans who WILL simply say,
"YEP! We opposed it" when the low information voters are forced to start paying The Bills.


ANY and ALL "regulation" can and will be quickly de-regulated (or simply not enforced).


I fully support the Health Care Reform Obama & The Democratic Party campaigned on:
A viable and competitive Public Option funded by raising taxes on those who make over $200,000/year.

I fully oppose THIS Republican Plan that has been substituted for the one they campaigned on.


"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans. I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven't felt the benefits of the economic upturn."---Paul Wellstone




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
59. get with the fucking program and help us help (a few of) the uninsured
Insurance doesn't do a fucking thing if you can't afford the co-pays or the deductibles.

If you want to help the uninsured - all of them, not leaving 20 million hanging - back a strong public option or (gawd forbid) single payer.

You know - the things this POS legislation DOESN'T do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Midway Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Our party let us down terribly on this one!
I told my Great Depression Era Democratic in-laws that I think this whole health insurance reform fiasco is an indictment against the "two- party" system that we supposedly have in America. It is apparent that our party has been bought by the highest bidders. They agreed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yea, PASSING real HCR after decades of failure is such a letdown.
:eyes:

Let me guess, you got yours already, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. "Real" Health Care "Reform" ???
Even Obama does not call it Health "Care" Reform anymore.

Mandates without a Public Option + Massive transfer of Public Money to Private Corporations IS a Republican Plan.
THIS does NOT open the door to Single Payer.
It Nails it shut!

Who could have predicted that letting Olympia Snow and Joe Lieberman write the Health Care Reform Bill would piss off so many Democrats? :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. Yes, real HCR
Apparently you STILL haven't read the bills. You have no clue what's really in there.

Get back to me after you have read them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Next, you'll be saying.
"Thank Gawd it passed"!!

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #42
58. Are you for the status quo?
I sure as fuck hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Midway Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. Nope! Been without for over 10 fucking years! Thanks "Democratic Party"!
When can I afford to see a Dr. about the chest pains I have been having lately? Health Care Reform!!??? You call this shit REFORM?!Got mine already!? Wanna see my fucking bills from two hours in an ER? In this case, you are a presumptuous JERK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Then you're fighting against your own self-interest.
Why?

It is reform, period. Read the bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. They are just calling it "reform" to fool the low information voters.
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 07:05 PM by bvar22
It IS a Bait & Switch sell out to the For Profit Health Insurance Industry, period.

Read the bills.

The "regulations" are full of loopholes and trap doors, and are written by the Corporations themselves.
Do you really think that all of a sudden these huge Corporations are going to start playing fairly, by the rules?
Or will they continue to employ legions of lawyers to contest every single consumer complaint for years through the courts?

Where is the powerful oversight agency that will monitor Mega-Corportions and their legions of lawyers and slap them down with punitive fines if they step outside the lines?

What is the track record of the Democratic Party over the last 20 years for "effectively regulating" the Corporations who are buying them their seats? :shrug:

Thanks.
Waiting patiently for the links on consumer enforcement mechanisms.

MY self interests:
A Viable Public Option "like Medicare", and raising taxes of those making over $200,000/ year.
You remember, the one Obama campaigned on.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Midway Rebel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. Why are you cheering for another corporate handout? How ironic.
You are saying READ the bills while my Dr. says I better PAY the fucking bills. Reform indeed.

Maybe next time I got to the ER I can just show them a copy of this senate "reform" bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #49
57. Why are HC stocks rising today on news that HCR might fail?
Read the bills if you want to continue this debate, otherwise get lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
33. Got mine already?
Nope!

I'm uninsured, and have been for the last 8 years, AND I'm approaching 60.
I ALSO would be entitled to a nice "subsidy".

I STILL oppose this bill.
It is a big step in the WRONG direction.

It IS a Republican Health Care Plan, and I'm ALL Democrat.
THIS kind of "Democrat":
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.--FDR


YOU won't find ANYTHING like the above on the DLC Website.
That is ONE reason I am so disgusted with the current state of affairs INSIDE the "Democratic" Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. Insurance reform with mandates and no cost control
is a failure of the mandate Dems were given and a failure of Obama who easily gave up single payer and Medicare expansion. So why don't you have yours? They could have passed pre-existing conditions and done none of this. You think some piddly subsidy will cover YOUR share the size of a mortgage?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Read the bills.
Obviously you haven't or you would know about the many cost-control measures in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #39
52. So is Lipitor going to be half price like is it in Canada?
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 02:11 PM by daa
Didn't think so. Taxing benefits called Cadillac plans is not cost control it is stupid, especially if you live in a high cost area like California. We spend twice as much as the rest of the world for worse outcomes and there is nothing in the bill that closes that gap any time soon if ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmallind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. Tell us how
How do you crush an elected Senator not of your party but who caucuses with you?

Take his committee chairs? Sure and quite probably a good idea. That changes his vote on HCR how?

Take away DSCC money? Nope - doesn't get any. If he did it would change his vote on HCR how?

Refuse to campaign for him? Didn't matter last time did it. Changes his vote on HCR how?

How exactly do we "crush him" in a way that changes his vote?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. it's easier to invent conspiracies about how obama and holy joe were in it together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #20
55. Yeap, and for some reason people rec these post...this doesn't move me away from a concerted effort
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. There are many other ways.
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 03:15 PM by bvar22
Lieberman has proven he can be bought.
BUY him. (I LIKE this one...Cut a DEAL)

Lieberman has proven that he is vain.
Threaten to ruin him.

Lieberman has proven he loves the spotlight.
Expose him.

America gave Obama and the Democrats a HUGE Popular MANDATE for Change.
Take that MANDATE and the Bully Pulpit and destroy him.

Read up on Huey Long and LBJ.
I don't like that kind of politics, but I like the current situation even less.
Can you imagine wimpy little Joe Lieberman standing up and saying NO! to LBJ or FDR?
LOL

At this point, I would go all J Edgar Hover on Lieberman's ass!

On Edit: Obama came out of CHICAGO for christ's sake.
He knows how to do this.
Go ask the Progressive Democrats who held out on Obama's supplemental War Funding.
He put the Winged Monkeys on their ass, and they came around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. ....uh....uh....you run him over with .....a ....tricycle or a ......big wheel....PONY!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. you awful person, you, telling it like it is!
it's republican "HCR" because the Democratic Party has been taken over by republicans masquerading as "democrats."
The two parties are as "different" as Coke and Pepsi, and with about the same value to society. And, like Coke and Pepsi, they are simply brands that are marketed.

"buying locally" to beat the corps will work for politics, too. We The People must forge ahead with something new and different. The citizens started getting more involved beginning in 2004, in reaction to GWB, by running for local offices--we need to build on that momentum.

The will is there for progressive legislation, it just needs some organization and leadership to bring it together. The Internet is making the previously dim prospect of viable third parties less dim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
25. Well OK
It's the fault of the voters of Conn.

OTOH, if Franken had not won, it would be Olympia Snowe's fault.

There is always going to be a 60th vote. At least it is Lieberman rather than a repuke and we got something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. George Bush and the Republicans NEVER needed that 60th vote.

Why is it so damned important NOW?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #34
50. I'm not sure that's true
But if it were, yes they did. They just got it because the Democrats were working with them and some voted with them. They didn't do 100% party of no like the repukes do.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
51. "At least it is Lieberman rather than a repuke "?
Pull your head OUT of there, man!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:09 PM
Response to Original message
43. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
53. Please cite the LAW that says Lieberman MUST vote the way Obama wants him to? Tia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC