Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

KABUL — The man with the bulging shawl had only just exploded when the real battle got under way.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:28 PM
Original message
KABUL — The man with the bulging shawl had only just exploded when the real battle got under way.
January 18, 2010, 2:25 pm
A Little Too Close to the Battle in Kabul
By DEXTER FILKINS


KABUL, Afghanistan — The man with the bulging shawl had only just exploded when the real battle got under way.

The scene shifted quickly, like a movie reel sped up: The suicide bomber, stopped from entering Afghanistan’s Central Bank, burst into pieces at its footsteps. Six surviving gunmen, who had wanted to follow their comrade inside, dashed instead into a shopping center and let loose from the rooftop with rifles and grenades. And hundreds of commandos with the Afghan government swarmed to the scene and opened fire.

For the next two hours the battle unfolded with cinematic vividness at the very heart of Afghanistan’s American-backed government. Waves of commandos encircled and fired and blasted the gang of guerrillas inside. The guerrillas fired back with equal ferocity, and with the knowledge, surely, that they were going to die. Children and old men and office workers ran stricken in waves. ... http://atwar.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/18/a-little-too-close-to-the-battle-in-kabul/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Kabul lottery
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 04:42 PM by laststeamtrain
The Kabul lottery
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/julian-borger-global-security-blog/2010/jan/18/kabul-attacks-taliban

The Afghan capital thrives despite a steady onslaught of bombs and rockets
Julian Borger, Guardian

When the insurgents struck at quarter to ten this morning, I was doing what most Kabulis do for much of the day - sitting in traffic. In a city frequently visited by car bombers the usual boredom and frustration is always tinged with anxiety. I was in a western embassy vehicle with its telltale high antennae moving in a short motorcade. A sitting duck, in other words, for what the Nato military call a VBSIED (vehicle-borne suicide improvised explosive device).

I am only here for a few days. The people who live here, Afghans and foreigners alike, learn to live with the risk. They hope that any would-be car bombers are stuck in traffic too, out of range. They avoid driving in the morning, on the grounds that suicide bombers tend to strike early, while their resolve is intact. If they spend hours cruising around looking for a target of opportunity, so the thinking goes, their self-destructive zeal ebbs away.

Most of all, the people who live here put their trust in statistics. It is a city of 3.5 million people. There is a security incident every seven or ten days, but some of those are poorly-aimed rockets. Complex attacks like this happen once or twice a year. Ultimately, its a matter of luck, and so far Kabulis and foreigners have been prepared to live with the odds.

The city is booming. Areas that were brown earth two years ago are now crowded with new buildings. The outskirts of the city are a sprawling car park for the biggest collection of construction equipment I have ever seen gathered in one place.

The daily odds would be improved if Afghan and Nato intelligence improved. It would also help if Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence agency (ISI) and that country's military establishment took action against the Haqqani network, which is based in North Waziristan and believed to be behind many previous attacks of this sort.

But Kabul will only be secure once a peace deal is done, and even then there will be dead-enders who stick to violence for years afterwards, as in Northern Ireland. The problems of Kabul are ultimately no more than a reflection of the country as a whole. It cannot and will not be safe while the rest of the country is at war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. talented writer, that
and doing us a service by being our eyes and ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. bring the troops home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC