Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ughh not feeling good about this...Nate's new numbers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bill219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:13 PM
Original message
Ughh not feeling good about this...Nate's new numbers
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/538-model-posits-brown-as-31-favorite.html

538 Model Posits Brown as 3:1 Favorite

The FiveThirtyEight Senate Forecasting Model, which correctly predicted the outcome of all 35 Senate races in 2008, now regards Republican Scott Brown as a 74 percent favorite to win the Senate seat in Massachusetts on the basis of new polling from ARG, Research 2000 and InsiderAdvantage which show worsening numbers for Brown's opponent, Martha Coakley.

----------------------------more at link

I have been phonebanking for almost three days now..I was getting good responses hardly any Brown support

What is going on in MA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. At the same time, pollsters are more error-prone in special rather than general elections,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm waiting for exit polls.
They are "never wrong" according to Mr. Morris. Ahem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Phonebanking ...

I've been doing some from Texas as well, and what I figured out was that this is a GOTV effort, not an attempt to convince too many undecideds. Most all my calls have involved positive responses too. I realized eventually that I'm calling Democrats and others who are known to be generally supportive but may need a nudge to get out the door and go to the polling place. Some of them didn't even know there was an election!

That seems to be a big part of the problem. Coakley will win if Dems don't sit on their hands, but a lot of them don't realize the stakes.

We live in a political junkie bubble on DU. This just isn't as important to some people as it is to those of us who mainline political news.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sounds like this one's over n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pretty much inline with Intrade
Lots of intraday movement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Are you calling Dems or independents? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. !!!!! NEW RULE !!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Oh, good. I thought maybe you'd come up with a New "!!!!! NEW RULE !!!!!",
which would have been kind of ambitious!

Two in one day... :silly:

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You're only allowed one new rule per day. That's one of the old, new rules. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Coakley will get it due to overwhelming Ds in MA.
Since Brown is also "pro-choice", there's no advantage to ES&S's social conservative fanatics to tamper w/ the count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You are forgetting independents which out number Ds
51% to 37%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nate's almost never wrong. His projections are a death knell. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-18-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
13. Keep hope alive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC