saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:18 PM
Original message |
I want Coakely to win, but even if she does, I want the Democratic Party to ask itself why this was |
|
even close. Pres.Obama sailed to victory because he tapped into what the public wanted to hear. Since them, on both a local and national level our politicians have gone tone deaf.
I do not live in Mass. I am unsure about their specific state issues, but many must be the same as those facing the rest of the states, and it "seems" that many of our base, as well as those outside it, do not feel they are being listened to.
it isn't just about health care but it is about everything and the message of our party has been ambivalent by choice. Ambivalence doesn't win elections.
We need to go back to our platform and fight for it. We need to stand for something.This is not the fault of the voters. This is not the fault of our "special interest groups", the unions who fought for what they have earned, women who want to protect their rights, GLBT who want to be given those rights to which they are entitled, peace makers who want to end war and all who want to claim at least the effort they were promised. It is the fault of those who crafted the message. Democrats need to go back to being Democrats again and they need to go back to supporting the reason the American public elected them.
We did not elect them to compromise to the point they gave away our principles in order to achieve a faux bipartisanship.We elected them to represent the interests of the people.
|
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message |
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I think there will be a turn regardless. |
|
If Coakley loses, it'll be a turn to the right because the liberal base couldn't be counted on.
If Coakley wins it'll be a turn to the left because, despite being horribly angered, the liberal base barely pulled it out and it'll be a huge wake up call.
Either way, there will be a turn.
|
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. The "liberal base" can hardly be blamed for the actions of the Democratic Party. |
|
You seem to be arguing the turn could be in either direction. My biggest fear is that there will be no "turn' at all and the lessons will not be learned.
|
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
16. I'm arguing from historical reactions |
|
Those are generally the historical reactions of the party mechanism over elections like this.
|
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. But you are arguing both directions.which do you think is more likely? |
WeDidIt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. IT depends on who wins tonight. n/t |
highplainsdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. Whatever happens in today's election, there will NOT be a turn to the right if the WH knows how to |
|
read polls.
The polls have all shown that HCR is much more popular with all voters, including Dems, as a generic idea, than the actual current plan for an individual mandate with no public option is. The current version of the HCR bill polls very badly with both Dems and independents.
I believe the more populist note Obama sounded while stumping for Coakley is the direction they're most likely to take. But it can't be populist rhetoric only -- it has to be backed up with actions.
I honestly don't know what they're going to do with this current HCR mess. The analysis by Robert Kuttner that I posted showed just how they did almost everything possible wrong, each step of the way. In effect they built themselves a legislative bridge to nowhere, since it can't win over conservatives and disappoints liberals. The White House thinks they can sell it. I'm skeptical of that, since I've seen no signs that the bill becomes more popular as people hear more about it.
But however bad that fiasco is, however long we're stuck with it -- and the Republicans can't wait to run against that mess of a bill -- the White House still has to find other ways to reassure voters that they're intending to deliver on more promises. And this time with populist actions to match the rhetoric.
|
Jester Messiah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
15. But the question must be asked"WHY" ? And again, just as the why this is close |
|
the ones that must answer this are those that pick the candidates!
|
BeyondGeography
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Good person, crap candidate...forget listening to people, she wouldn't even shake their hands |
ThomWV
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Not a chance. If we win the Party's memory will be about 3 news-cycles long. |
T Wolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Platform. What is a platform? A holdover from an earlier time when a party would list their |
|
objectives and values so that there was a sense of unity. Now, it is an exercise in bullshit. Ignored as soon (or before) an election is over.
|
amborin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
27. and therein is the problem; voters perceived Obama ran on a progressive |
|
platform; while his actual record did not support this perception, he made enough promises during his campaign to entice voters into believing they were voting for progressive change
instead, we saw payouts of all sorts to the corporate elites, and very little flowing in the direction of ordinary working Americans
right now, we're hearing populist rhetoric from Obama, such as scolding Wall Street, for example; but this is so far only empty posturing and charades, for public and media consumption and with very little real substance. The banking reform legislation, for example, is so full of loopholes as to be spineless.
So, until Obama starts walking his populist talk, more and more Americans are going to become disillusioned and resentful. And vote with their feet, so to speak.
|
Common Sense Party
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #27 |
28. Voters saw what they wanted to see in him. |
|
Progressives saw him as a progressive.
Centrists saw him as a centrist moderate.
Conservatives saw him as a socialist.
Same candidate.
|
YOY
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Right there with you 100%. |
|
But apparently I just got blamed for a loss already...funny really.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Me too on both accounts. Washington has its own bubble |
|
and maybe this will be a prick of it. When it pops, maybe they will listen.
|
Tesha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
24. You'd think with all the pricks already in Washington the bubble would have been burst... |
|
years ago.
But sadly, no.
Tesha
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Recommend. And agree with the OP. |
|
If the president continues to believe that the downturn of success by Democrats in elections is unconnected to his equivocations and abandonment of things dear to his voters, he's going to see more elected Democrats in trouble. He's got to get his head in the game and stop believing his own press releases.
|
highplainsdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |
wisteria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message |
OHdem10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Poor Communications from WH and Congress.. Both need to jerk |
|
a knot in their Communications Depts.
Back in the summer when the TeaBaggers were in a fit demanding Town Halls. This is not about Teabaggers so do not start yipping at me yet.
The fact there were people angry enough to take to the street should have made a smart politician antennae go up. Where were the Communications types from Congress? WH?? Even if they thought these were Republicans, they should have considered the big influence "mob psychology" could have on Democratic Rank and File and especially Independents. It is as they dismissed the Teabaggers. Thereby, left the a vacuum (big enough to drive a Mack Truck through) permitted the Republicans to completely describe and DEFINE the Health Care Plan. When you leave information out there this long, the Public Believes IT. It is H---trying to tell them they have been misinformed after they believe in mind that Obama want's socialized Medicine.
There is enough blame to go around. Some soul searching in Communications Depts is in order.+
all through the fall big enough
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
Lord Helmet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 05:57 PM by Lord Helmet
the op is poaching DU'ers to another website where she is a moderator
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
26. The one with the tree? |
anonymous171
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
19. "Ambivalence doesn't win elections" |
|
Right on. :thumbsup: :kick:
|
derby378
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
20. I'm nominating you for DUer of the Day |
saracat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-20-10 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
31. thank you. I appreciate the compliment! |
branders seine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 05:50 PM
Response to Original message |
23. the central lie of the American political system is that you win |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 05:50 PM by branders seine
by governing in the "center" (which is now so far right that almost no actual Americans are there)
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message |
25. People and the party reps are already making their rationalizations and finding their scapegoats |
|
Hopefully, at least the Obama camp is having a reality check.
|
ibegurpard
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 06:43 PM
Response to Original message |
flvegan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 06:45 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Given enough time, EVERYone gets sick of being lied to. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:02 AM
Response to Original message |