grahamhgreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:37 PM
Original message |
If they manage to pass the SENATE version of the bill with less than 60 votes, instead of a Public |
|
Option version, or Medicare buy-in version, I think we can safely conclude that all of their posturing and PR was complete and utter bullshit - a screw job meant to fuck us over and enrich big insurance at the expense of sick and dying Americans - utterly disgusting.
|
jaxx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Did you want that Stupak Amendment in there too? |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 04:38 PM by jaxx
edited to change Sestak to Stupak.
My apologies to everyone. That's what I get for being in a hurry.
|
grahamhgreen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. No. Single payer or Medicare buy-in, Public Option or crush the crapsurance bill. |
jaxx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Public option is in the house bill |
|
along with the Sestak amendment....which they had to take in order to pass the bill.
|
Vincardog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. unfortunately it is the Presidents... er Senates bill that is poised to pass with out change. |
derby378
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. It's not really a public option |
|
If I can't enroll in it, it's not "public."
|
jaxx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. It's as public an option as we were going to see. |
bain_sidhe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Not Sestak, Stupak n/t |
jaxx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
I was in a hurry and the S was there. My apologies to all.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message |