derby378
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:36 PM
Original message |
That's it - Brown's 2012 Dem challenger must be pro-gun, pro-PO, pro-jobs, pro-choice, and HUNGRY. |
|
Scott Brown's Democratic challenger must be so focused on winning that Senate seat that he or she acts like a junkyard dog chewing on a hunk of raw meat. No vacations in the Carribean, no misspelling "Massachusetts," no half-assed campaign tour. The candidate must focus on the Senate seat like a laser and pursue it like a bloodhound chasing an escaped convict.
Hunger. Drive. Ambition. These are not necessarily bad things in a candidate, provided he or she have the people's best interests at heart.
Martha Coakley learned this lesson just a little too late.
(Reposted from earlier - apparently there was a glitch.)
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Would pro-gun be that important in Massachussets? I mean really? |
derby378
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Given the circumstances, it just might |
|
I'm not saying the candidate should get all mushy about the NRA - I think most MA voters would have none of that.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:02 PM
Response to Original message |