Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The worst thing to happen to the Democrats was the 60-vote majority.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:19 PM
Original message
The worst thing to happen to the Democrats was the 60-vote majority.
Which they never really had.

I look at this loss in MA a little differently than most. I think it is a good thing. The Democrats will finally abandon the illusion of a 60-vote majority and the Republicans can no longer hide and be the Party of "No". There are major problems facing this country and the Democrats cannot solve them by themselves, it is obvious to see. But the Republicans can no longer stand on the sideline and point fingers. They are now forced to work together. Or what happened today will come back and bite them big time. There are no more excuses for either Party. The people want jobs and solutions, not back-biting partisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. +1
Just what I was thinking after I heard the news. I voted for Coakley, but not happily.

It might be for the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Which they never really had.
Lieberman was never on our team. With Dems like Baucus, who needs Republicans?

I continue to believe that people are grossly uniformed about who they are voting for and what the consequences will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Filibusters are bad. It gives accountability with no power.
At least if a simple majority worked you could hold someone responsible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. You're misreading the Republicans

They WILL still stand on the sideline and point fingers.

They were doing it up until the time Arlen switched and Al was seated when we didn't have 60 votes then.


They will NOT feel forced to work together. The Republicans will feel emboldened, and will shout "NO!" even louder.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. Maybe the Dems will
start behaving like the Republicans do. They never did have 60 but managed to ram through all kinds of shit.

So deal with the had you've been dealt, Democratic controlled Senate.

Do something with your fucking majority. You do still have a majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. What nonsense. The congressional elections are coming.
No need for the Republicans to do anything but laugh at us. I would, if I didn't care that it meant Americans are dying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BunkerHill24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Indeed, we never had the sense of what it meant to have 60 votes!.
...nor what it meant to have control of the WH, and both houses. Maybe tomorrow, we will have sense of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scubadude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. On fiscal matters there are only about 46 Democrats.
The Blue Dogs are Republicans on those matters.

Scuba
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Not that sanguine on the Republicans
they are the party of no. They are salivating right now about how now they can call a filibuster for everything.

They have proven completely intransigent. They will not budge at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC