JonQ was finally banned?

[gatorboy]

Things ARE looking up considering yesterday's events. :P

[Jim Sagle]

1. Who the hell was JonQ?

[gatorboy]

4. Probably one of the most successful trolls I've seen on these boards.

I can't believe it took so long. Must be a record.

[Name removed]

11. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[gatorboy]

20. Before my time I guess.

Jon was still one of the great... Pricks :P

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

21. Jody Schekter?

:shrug:

[Commie Pinko Dirtbag]

23. Yeah

Sans surname

[BeHereNow]

48. Now THAT is a great post CPD.

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
BHN

[MattBaggins]

37. Would you say he was as good as LegendInHisOwnMindCrime?

[hfojvt]

31. that's what I said

the only one I know is from the movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyuSAZZP7ag

[Name removed]

2. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[Occulus]

22. *snerk*

:spray:

[seabeyond]

3. well..... boo yahhhhh. nt

[gatorboy]

5. I think he has a fan!

Someone unrecommended the thread! :rofl:

[Ian David]

9. I Unrecced it because internal DU business doesn't belong on Greatest page.

But I share the sentiment.

[omega minimo]

13. It's sad

that you are compelled to play arbiter in such a negative fashion. Is you finger always on the UnRec trigger?

[greyl]

27. Wrong, it was a positive action.

But it's always nice to see you being so supportive of fellow DUers and DU.

[Ian David]

29. "Ignored" responded to me, too. But I can't read it. n/t

[omega minimo]

32. It's not positive, it's negative. It's sad.

[greyl]

34. Being sad about dumb shit isn't going to help anything.

Why don't you turn off your PC?

[omega minimo]

43. Being obsessed with UnRec "about dumb shit isn't going to help anything."

It adds negativity to the Board -- or maybe gives the petty an outlet with their little button....

[apocalypsehow]

47. If you are aware that the poster above has you on *ignore*, why do you continue to post to him?

I'm curious about the mentality that knows full well it is being ignored in this setting, yet still pretends to "score" some scintillating point by posting to a person who does not wish to interact with them, and has made this publicly known. Restraining orders have been issued for less in the "real" world away from the internet.

Care to enlighten us?

[omega minimo]

49. those are your games, not mine

aside from the fact you don't know what you're talking about.

[apocalypsehow]

51. Non-responsive clap-trap. About what I expected. n/t.

[omega minimo]

54. There is no response

to your games and false accusations.

[apocalypsehow]

60. More non-responsive last wordism. Talk about "games"...

Do you deny that the poster above has stated they have you on *ignore*, and that you have continued to post replies to said poster? If your answer to either question is "no," then one is left to assume one of two things:

1. You are knowingly making false statements, or

2. You cannot read.

Either, or.

[omega minimo]

62. Yes.

This is beyond sad, it's stupid. You've got problems.




'Do you deny that the poster above has stated they have you on *ignore*, and that you have continued to post replies to said poster?'

Yes. You have twice stated that I "continued to post replies to said poster" which is false.

I posted one reply to someone who claimed to have someone on Ignore -- so the fuck what? And what business is it of yours?

If folks want to play games about pretending not to be able to see a post or attempting to make some public pronouncement about who they're Ignoring, that's their problem. Sticking your nose in it is pathetic.

[apocalypsehow]

63. So, it's a modified version of both #1 & #2 you're going with. Pitiful. n/t.

[omega minimo]

64. What part of It's None Of Your Business don't you comprehend?

:thumbsdown: the point of the subthread was how sad these petty obsessions are and you are providing more examples. Taking it upon yourself on behalf of someone else to defend petty games and posturing with a heaping side of major control issues :freak: Using your own false statements and inability to read to do so.

"#1 and #2" indeed. :puke:


Ya know the worst part? Smart people using their abilities to be so stupid. That's sad.:spray:

[apocalypsehow]

65. What part of if it's posted on the open forum it's every bit my business don't *YOU* comprehend?

I was just curious about the mindset that tries to pretend it's "scored" some internet "point" by posting replies to another poster they know has them on *ignore*. It's a very curious phenomenon.

"petty obsessions"...LOL! I'm not the one replying more and more hysterically with every passing post. It's called "projection," by the bye.

[apocalypsehow]

66. No, the "worst part" is posturing to pretend one has just dazzled another poster with brilliance in

a reply, all the while knowing said poster has them on *ignore*. I'd get that problem of yours checked out - pronto.

[omega minimo]

67. What did Ignoreds say?

:rofl:

[apocalypsehow]

68. Your concession in this repartee is duly noted. n/t.

:thumbsup:

[omega minimo]

69. "Ya know the worst part? Smart people using their abilities to be so stupid. That's sad."

[apocalypsehow]

70. No, the "worst part" is posturing to pretend one has just dazzled another poster with brilliance in

a reply, all the while knowing said poster has them on *ignore*.

As I said before, I'd get that problem of yours checked out - pronto.

[blondeatlast]

6. 'Bout damn time (love ya, Mods, but that one was odiferous). nt

[NYC_SKP]

7. I'm baaaaaaack!

:evilgrin:

[seabeyond]

10. lol lol. that is exactly the tone he had. bah hahha. so funny. cause it is just him. nt

[onehandle]

8. A Gungeon denizen? Never. They're all true blue 'libruls.' nt

[Commie Pinko Dirtbag]

12. I'm willing to bet he gloated very openly over Brown.

The timing is just too suspect.

(No post from him can be found in the last two weeks. All deleted, it seems.)

[greyl]

24. You would lose.

It happened on Jan 4th or 5th.

[muriel_volestrangler]

36. Ooh - I had an argument with him early on Jan 5th

in a now-deleted sub-thread. Maybe I need a sticker to slap on the side of my plane ... :evilgrin:

[greyl]

39. Population? If so, I was there before things started getting deleted.

edit: Not that you don't deserve a toothy victorious decal. :)

[muriel_volestrangler]

45. No, it was about him accusing DUers of saying things they hadn't

(in a thread about an Obama effigy). I've found the titles of the posts (all that's preserved in the Google cache, for some of them), and there were one or 2 others in the sub-threads too, so I don't think I can claim sole credit.

[Pithlet]

61. That was his MO.

He was one of the worst posters ever on DU. So glad he's gone.

[omega minimo]

14. one of the worst ever

[hfojvt]

28. Why? All he wanted was an operation for his son.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyuSAZZP7ag

[HughMoran]

59. We agree on something?

:evilgrin:

[omega minimo]

71. Probably two things

your screen name is very clever.

[Hekate]

15. Ooooh, another one from my Ignore list finally bites the dust.

:* bye-bye

[seabeyond]

16. that knuckle draggin kinda gives them away. nt

[Number23]

17. Agreed! I will miss his repeated use of the rofl smiley in damn near every post

It gave him such a je ne sais quoi... :eyes:

[jpak]

50. !

:rofl:

[OnyxCollie]

18. Buh bye.

[Starry Messenger]

19. Another MRA finally bites the dust.

No surprise, he was also a racist. I think that's what got him nailed finally.

[GoCubsGo]

57. That IS what got him nailed.

I was wondering what it would take, considering he was skirting the line for so long. You know, he reminds me of Eric Cartman in the "South Park" episode, "The Entity": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Entity_%28South_Park%29

[Starry Messenger]

74. They just can't help themselves after awhile.

He called me a manhater in November. All kinds of anti-feminist BS. He was probably homophobic too. Men's Rights types are usually guys who think the white straight male is an endangered species.

[Gold Metal Flake]

25. It will be back.

No one who posts that much will allow a banning to keep them away.

[TrogL]

26. Un-rec'd - does not belong on Greatest Page

[hfojvt]

30. it might, but I really cannot remember this guy.

I'm gonna have to do a search.

[omega minimo]

33. Is that really a concern? Is there any chance this would get to the Greatest Page?

:shrug:

[greyl]

35. Some people care about quality. nt

[MattBaggins]

38. Maybe, just maybe, you folks could perhaps just

unrec the fucking threads and move along without having to put your snooty noses in the air and announce the unrec?

You guys really don't need to mess up the flow with your self congratulating announcements of your unrecs. Really. Seriously. No one cares.

[greyl]

40. I don't announce it, and I'm certain that most people don't.

Your post originated in your imagination.

[omega minimo]

44. and perhaps

unclench their sphincters!! :spray:

[omega minimo]

46. That's not "caring about quality," that's having some pathetic control issues.

[Sans Culottes]

41. Best news i've read since

the demise of OMC.

:applause:

BTW, I heard another reincarnation of the peanut variety is biting granite, too.

[Commie Pinko Dirtbag]

42. Really? Where? -nt

[LeftishBrit]

52. I think that must be the person who thought that France is doomed to utter lawlessness...

because rioters who burned cars there didn't instantly get shot by random bystanders!

If that's the one, then I'm quite relieved he got TS'd.

[blondeatlast]

53. The very one. nt

[Douglas Carpenter]

55. Alhamdulillah

[Kingofalldems]

56. Not bragging--but I think I helped

Around the first week of January.

[Quantess]

58. He wasn't that bad.

He just was a climate change/global warming denier. Other than that he was alright.

[seabeyond]

72. yet totally embrace and advocate

evolutionary behavorial psychology as pure science.

that is a hoot

[Quantess]

76. Oh, I guess I wasn't paying attention.

All I noticed was that he loved denying global warming.

[Commie Pinko Dirtbag]

73. Wrong.

He was RW in a plethora of subjects.

He once even lambasted Obama for... wait for it... having a security motorcade. I guess he was disappointed that his security WAS effective: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3949270#3949275

[Paladin]

75. Good News; Way Overdue...... (n/t)